
The quarterbacks showed situational command, the defensive line’s next wave continues to emerge, and a team that has talked all summer about becoming player-led delivered what Tony Tuioti called an “elite” Monday after its first fall scrimmage.
There are plenty of ways to evaluate a scrimmage. Dan Lanning gave Oregon two of them Saturday when he said every player would eventually be judged on whether he was accountable and capable, but the more revealing test may have arrived roughly 48 hours later.
It is one thing to play approximately 120 snaps on Saturday, receive a recovery day and feel good about surviving the first significant live work of fall camp. It is another to return Monday, put the scrimmage behind you and practice with the kind of urgency Oregon will eventually require after Saturdays that actually count. Defensive line coach Tony Tuioti has been at Oregon throughout Lanning’s tenure, and he said Practice 10 produced something he had not seen before.
“This is like the first time in my career since I’ve been here at Oregon where we had a scrimmage on Saturday and we had an elite practice on Monday,” Tuioti said. “Typically there’s a little dip from that and you try to get the guys to come practice really, really hard. But today I’m really, really proud of those guys because it was one of the best practices we’ve had coming off a scrimmage.”
That answer probably tells us more about Practice 10 than any depth-chart revelation would have.
Oregon began fall camp talking about possibilities. Lanning wanted to discover how much football players could absorb. Chris Hampton talked about installing enough defense that the Ducks could eventually determine what they did best. Drew Mehringer called the roster a meritocracy. By Saturday, Lanning had reduced the evaluation to accountable and capable and warned that players who failed either test would eventually see their repetitions diminish.
Monday began showing us what happens next.
The first scrimmage supplied evidence. Practice 10 began revealing how Oregon responds to it.
The player-led idea is beginning to acquire substance
Tuioti’s description of Monday connects all the way back to Lanning’s first practice of camp. After that opening workout, Lanning said the first day can sometimes become an exercise in survival before challenging his veteran players with a different question: “You were able to make it. Who’d you bring with you?” He wanted more than established players who could meet Oregon’s standard individually. He wanted “alphas” capable of pulling somebody else toward it.
The first scrimmage offered another piece of that story. Oregon finished roughly 120 plays and then conditioned, and Lanning said players were asking for more rather than simply waiting for practice to end. That was encouraging, but Monday may have been a better test because emotion can carry players through a scrimmage. Returning two days later and attacking an ordinary practice requires something more sustainable.
Tuioti traced Monday’s response directly to the mindset Oregon has been trying to create.
“Coach Lanning challenges each and every one of us to choose hard,” Tuioti said. “On the other side of hard is our greatness. And none of us came here to Oregon because we were looking for easy. We know that it’s definitely hard here. The competition is really, really high. Expectations are really, really high. You know, it’s a privilege for us. Pressure is a privilege, and we enjoy that.”
Then he gave us an example of what Lanning’s Practice 1 challenge looks like when it begins working. Tuioti said Bear Alexander took another step Monday in bringing teammates along, describing one of Oregon’s levels of competitors as a “commander,” a player who can elevate the performance of younger teammates rather than simply handling his own responsibility.
“Can our leaders bring people along with them?” Tuioti said. “If we can bring everybody else that are, you know, whether they’re younger, they’re first-year guys, second-year guys, to play better than what they’ve done the day before, we’re better as a team. And I thought we took that step today.”
That is almost a direct answer to the question Lanning posed two weeks ago.
Who did you bring with you?
On Monday, Tuioti believed some of Oregon’s veterans did.
Koa Ka’ai saw a quarterback room playing the situation rather than merely the play
Quarterbacks coach Koa Ka’ai’s review of Saturday was similarly encouraging, although the most important part of his assessment was not a completion percentage or explosive throw.
It was situational understanding.
“I think those guys made good decisions,” Ka’ai said. “We had one turnover that was on a batted ball. But beyond that, I thought those guys did a really good job of understanding the situation in the game, not playing every down like it’s first down.”
Ka’ai called it a “pretty sound first scrimmage” and said it was probably among the better ones the quarterback room has produced during his time at Oregon. More importantly, he said all four quarterbacks have made identifiable improvements from spring through fall camp.
That situational piece is worth lingering on because it fits almost perfectly with the way Oregon’s offensive conversation has evolved.
Mehringer spent the first week describing an offense that wants to avoid turnovers, generate explosive plays, run when required and become better in the red zone. He also warned that complexity can become a “double-edged sword” because every new answer requires repetitions that could have gone somewhere else. Lanning then explained Saturday that Oregon deliberately called things its players already understood so the staff could evaluate who could actually block, tackle and break tackles rather than hiding personnel evaluation beneath schematic complexity.
Ka’ai’s evaluation moves the quarterback version of that discussion forward. Knowing the playbook is not enough anymore. The quarterbacks have to understand what the moment requires and avoid treating every snap as an independent opportunity to make something happen.
That is especially important for a room Oregon appears to believe is substantially deeper than a traditional starter-and-backup arrangement.
Dylan Raiola’s progress has become increasingly tangible
Saturday, Lanning called Dylan Raiola a “night and day different player” from the quarterback who arrived for spring practice. Monday, Ka’ai gave us considerably more detail about what has actually changed.
The playbook, interestingly, was not the primary issue.
“The guy’s super smart, so learning the offense really wasn’t a hurdle for him,” Ka’ai said. “But physically, he’s improved. Like I said, his pocket movement, his body’s changed a bunch.”
That fills in an important piece of the Raiola story we have been following since Media Day. Raiola acknowledged that spring was not always smooth as he learned a new system and adapted to another program. The information that began filtering out later in camp suggested he had reshaped his body and taken significant steps in his command of the offense. Lanning’s post-scrimmage assessment validated that trajectory, while Ka’ai’s comments Monday explained that some of the biggest gains have come in the physical details required to make the talent function inside the pocket.
That is also consistent with what Raiola showed publicly in the spring game. His layered throw to Messiah Hampton down the sideline was one of the better quarterback throws of the afternoon, but spring was always supposed to be the starting point rather than the finished version.
The next step is no longer demonstrating that Raiola belongs in the room.
It is determining exactly where he belongs within it.
Akili Smith Jr. is beginning to turn tools into operation
Ka’ai provided perhaps an even more revealing update on Akili “KJ” Smith Jr., because the question surrounding Smith has never really been whether the physical ability exists.
It has been how quickly everything else can catch up.
“KJ, I can’t speak enough of how much KJ has grown from the spring till now,” Ka’ai said. “He’s taken a huge leap. A lot of that’s just like playing in the confines of the system.”
That phrase, the confines of the system, matters. Ka’ai explained that Oregon provides quarterbacks with numerous schematic tools, which can become overwhelming for a young player when the game is moving quickly. Smith’s progress has come from learning to slow that process down and ask a more manageable question.
“What is this play asking of me?” Ka’ai said, describing Smith’s development. “And going out there and operating.”
Later, Ka’ai explained where some of that progress is coming from. Smith has developed his own study routine rather than simply copying what works for somebody else in the room. At home, he goes into a guest room with a whiteboard and redraws the installation each night, turning the playbook into something he can process in his own way.
“He’s figured out, ‘Hey, what works for Dante Moore studying-wise might not work for me. What is the schedule and the routine that I need?’” Ka’ai said. “You can see through camp all that work that he’s put in in the offseason since the spring game until now. And he can see the fruit of his labor now.”
That may be one of the better developmental details we have received about any young Oregon player this camp. The physical traits brought Smith to Oregon. Learning how he learns may be what allows him to eventually use them.
Dante Moore is becoming the standard inside the room
The most significant quarterback development, however, may not involve the competition behind Dante Moore at all.
It may be the way his presence affects it.
Ka’ai said Moore’s third year in the program has given him an understanding of small details and offensive intricacies that even newer members of the staff may not possess. The result is an offense Ka’ai believes can carry almost anything Oregon wants to ask of it.
“There’s not much that we can’t do right now at all,” Ka’ai said. “And I think his knowledge definitely rubs off on the rest of the room.”
Then came the more revealing line.
“It’s not like, ‘Oh, hey, Tay’s the starter. That’s the guy, yada, yada, yada.’ It’s like, ‘Well, hey, Tay’s the starter. How do I become like Dante Moore?’ So he kind of sets the standard and he kind of sets the example for the rest of the room.”
That is a considerably different quarterback story from the one Oregon carried into previous seasons when the primary August question was about identifying the starter. Moore’s return changed that. The Ducks know who will run the offense if healthy. What they are discovering now is what happens when an established starter becomes a developmental resource for everybody behind him.
Mehringer had already pointed toward that evolution earlier in camp, describing Moore’s greatest growth in terms of leadership and command rather than simply arm talent. Ka’ai reinforced it Monday, saying Moore has taken another step in defensive recognition and in holding teammates accountable because he is no longer navigating his first season as Oregon’s starter.
The public side of Moore’s offseason has also expanded dramatically. He appeared on the cover of EA Sports College Football, traveled and received the kind of attention that naturally follows a quarterback with his résumé and profile. Ka’ai does not believe any of it has followed Moore back into the building.
“He’s a very private kid, and he’s a professional,” Ka’ai said. “When it’s time to work, it’s time to work. When it’s time to play, it’s time to play. When it’s time to kind of get away, it’s time to get away.”
“He does a really good job of not letting the two worlds blend,” Ka’ai added.
That ability may become increasingly important as Oregon moves closer to the season. Moore no longer needs to prove he can throw the football at this level. The next challenge is carrying the expectations attached to Oregon’s quarterback position without allowing everything surrounding the position to interfere with playing it.
Marcus Mariota remains part of Oregon’s quarterback education
Ka’ai has a particularly useful perspective on that issue because his relationship with Marcus Mariota stretches back to when both were freshmen at Oregon. He remembers Mariota as the quarterback who was not yet expected to play but was still awake at 5 a.m. working through cadence and call sheets.
More than a decade later, Ka’ai believes Mariota’s value to the current quarterback room extends beyond anything he did while winning the Heisman Trophy.
“He’s just such a great role model for our guys,” Ka’ai said. “Somebody who carries himself in class, somebody who’s been through the ups and downs of success in this sport and some ebbs and flows of the sport.”
Ka’ai pointed specifically to the way Mariota has handled changes in his NFL role and said current Oregon quarterbacks have relationships with him, sometimes reaching out directly.
There are football details too. Ka’ai said Moore’s footwork on read-zone plays includes elements taken directly from studying Mariota, and Oregon will pull up Mariota’s NFL film when he is around the program. The Heisman Trophy sitting inside the building provides the obvious symbol, but Ka’ai’s point was that Mariota continues to offer something more useful than nostalgia.
He provides a living example of how the position can be carried.
“When you walk in this building, what do you see on the first floor? You see the Heisman,” Ka’ai said. “He’s kind of set that standard for what it is to be an Oregon athlete, I think.”
The backup competition is about trust, not merely arm talent
The depth behind Moore remains unresolved, and Ka’ai did not attempt to manufacture clarity that Oregon has not yet reached.
His explanation of the backup quarterback job was more interesting than a ranking anyway.
“The guy’s got to want to play for him,” Ka’ai said. “The guys got to believe in that person. The guys have to want to go out there and battle for that person.”
Knowledge and arm talent obviously matter, but Ka’ai said Oregon already believes it has four quarterbacks who can win games. The separator becomes consistency, command and the ability to move the offense rather than simply possessing the best collection of individual traits.
That is what makes the three candidates behind Moore so different.
Brock Thomas brings years of system knowledge and has already answered the call when Oregon needed him, including helping the Ducks win a difficult game against Wisconsin. Smith has the unusual physical profile, with Ka’ai describing the 6-foot-6 quarterback as a player who can run, possesses a powerful arm and routinely flashes those traits in practice. Raiola brings something neither has: extensive starting experience in the Big Ten and proof that he can run an offense at this level.
“At some point, we’re going to have to figure that out,” Ka’ai said. “But all three guys have talents, and all three guys are capable of winning games in this league, we believe.”
Eventually Oregon will need an order because practice repetitions require one. Ka’ai acknowledged that reality, explaining that the decision will involve Lanning, Mehringer and the entire quarterback operation rather than becoming his call alone. Continuity matters, and backup quarterbacks cannot develop properly if nobody knows who will receive the meaningful second-team work.
That decision does not sound imminent.
But unlike the competition for the starting job, it is a decision Oregon can afford to make carefully.
Practice against Oregon’s defense is changing what the quarterbacks have to solve
The quarterback evaluation also cannot be separated from the defense across the line.
Ka’ai was asked whether practicing against a defense with legitimate NFL talent throughout the depth chart helps the quarterbacks. His response was unequivocal.
“Without a doubt,” Ka’ai said. “You want practice to be harder than the game, right? And there’s a bunch of places that that is the case. And I can tell you without a doubt, that’s 100 percent the case here.”
Ka’ai talked about accounting for defensive linemen capable of playing professionally and a secondary filled with similar potential. The result is that Oregon’s quarterbacks are not merely running plays against the correct coverage. They have to account for the athletic ability of the defender executing it.
“Here’s our man-to-man beater, but now I have to play ability,” Ka’ai said. “There’s another variable, another layer that comes into play.”
“To get to go against guys who are going to play on Sundays every day in camp, I think that’s an invaluable experience for our guys,” he added. “Sometimes practice is harder than a game, and I think that’s what you kind of want.”
That provides an important counterweight to one of the larger concerns emerging from camp. Everything I have heard suggests Oregon’s defensive front has gotten the better of the offensive line through significant stretches, and Moore has not always received the cleanest protection. That is something worth continuing to monitor, but Ka’ai’s comments capture why the evaluation cannot stop at saying the offense lost a rep.
The quality of the opponent matters.
And Tuioti gave us considerably more evidence Monday about exactly what the offense is seeing.
The defensive line’s next wave is becoming difficult to call a second group
Most of Oregon’s defensive-line attention entering camp centered on the veterans. Tuioti did not dispute what players such as Teitum Tuioti, Matayo Uiagalelei, Bear Alexander and A’Mauri Washington bring, but his review of the scrimmage quickly moved toward the players behind them.
“We kind of know who we got out of the older guys,” Tuioti said. “It’s really the next ones that are coming up.”
The names that followed should sound familiar to anyone who has followed Oregon since spring.
Aydin Breland has added enough size to reach approximately 315 pounds while maintaining the athleticism to work both outside and inside. Tuioti called him a “big-time pass rusher.” Anthony “Tank” Jones has undergone an even more dramatic physical transformation, reaching roughly 300 pounds while maintaining the speed, power and twitch that made him intriguing at a much lighter weight. Matthew Johnson earned praise as a technician whose pre-snap intelligence and dependability allow him to handle considerable responsibility, while D’Antre Robinson gives Oregon another large, twitchy and athletic body.
This is not a new development created by one August scrimmage. Breland was one of the more disruptive defensive players in Oregon’s spring game, where he and Nasir Wyatt combined to collapse the pocket and Breland later added another sack. Jones and Robinson also generated pressure that afternoon.
What has changed is the certainty with which Tuioti is talking about Breland’s role.
Aydin Breland has moved from promising pass rusher toward dependable defensive lineman
Breland’s athleticism has never been difficult to see. His ability to rush the passer showed up throughout spring, and the size increase has only made the possibilities more interesting.
The question was whether Oregon could trust him when opponents were not obviously throwing the football.
“We’ve known that he can always rush the passer, but as always, can we depend on you first, second down?” Tuioti said. “And he’s made that a point of emphasis for him.”
Tuioti said Breland has become bigger and stronger enough to handle combination blocks, hold the point and become more reliable against the run. His conclusion left considerably less ambiguity than most August position discussions.
“He’s definitely a guy that we’re going to depend on, definitely a guy that’s going to get a lot of reps for us this season.”
That may be one of the more important personnel developments of Practice 10.
Hampton said earlier in camp that the players perceived as Oregon’s second defensive-line group were actually competing with the established veterans, and he resisted treating anybody as the owner of a starting spot. Breland now appears to be supplying exactly the kind of evidence that makes those comments more than motivational language.
Oregon may have four veteran names everyone recognizes.
That does not mean it intends to play only four.
Position flexibility is giving Hampton more ways to construct the front
The theme of versatility that Lanning introduced after Practice 1 showed up repeatedly in Tuioti’s interview.
Lanning originally called it “mental acuity,” explaining that Oregon would ask players to handle additional roles only after demonstrating they could absorb the information. The examples stretched across the roster: running backs doing more than playing running back, receivers learning every spot, offensive linemen working multiple positions and defensive backs moving between levels of the defense.
The defensive line is beginning to show its own version.
Breland can work outside and inside. Jones offers similar flexibility at nearly 300 pounds. Elijah Rushing is now around 285 pounds, according to Tuioti, and Oregon has begun expanding what it asks him to do as well.
“We’re a defense that has a variety of schemes, and we can do a lot of things,” Tuioti said. “And when you got athletic bodies like that, you can plug and play them where you want.”
Tuioti said Rushing’s length allows him to hold up in the run game while also contributing pass rush from multiple alignments, including some interior work Oregon is beginning to introduce.
That connects back to Hampton’s description from the first week of camp. Oregon installed broadly because the eventual goal was not to use everything. It was to determine which players could handle which jobs, self-scout the result and “major” in the things Oregon performs best.
The more players Tuioti develops who can function in multiple alignments, the more freedom Hampton has to make the defense look different without constantly changing personnel.
That is where depth becomes schematic value.
“The ball is oxygen” gives another layer to Oregon’s defensive emphasis
Saturday, Lanning made one of his strongest defensive statements of camp when he said this has been Oregon’s best fall camp under him in terms of attacking the football.
Tuioti made clear Monday that the defensive line is not exempt from that responsibility.
“The ball, the ball, the ball,” Tuioti said. “The ball is oxygen for us.”
The emphasis begins in individual periods and carries into team work, with Oregon deliberately celebrating takeaways and ball attacks so the behavior becomes contagious across the defense.
That is another important expansion of the “havoc” discussion Hampton introduced after Practice 2. Oregon entered camp wanting more sacks and tackles for loss after failing to finish enough opportunities last season. Saturday showed that havoc is not limited to putting the quarterback on the ground. Lanning said Peyton Woodyard intercepted a tipped pass and described this defense as the best of his Oregon tenure at attacking possession.
For the defensive line, those ideas work together. Pressure can produce poor throws. Pursuit creates opportunities to attack the ball. Stopping the run earns better pass-rush situations, which Lanning emphasized Saturday when discussing the glimpses he has seen from Oregon’s improved rush.
The defense does not simply want disruption.
It wants disruption that changes possession.
Development means surviving the part where somebody else is ahead of you
Tuioti’s update on Elijah Rushing supplied another connection to the larger culture Oregon has been trying to build.
Rushing arrived at Oregon with the résumé and recruiting profile that naturally created expectations for immediate production, but his first seasons have required considerably more patience. In the portal era, Tuioti acknowledged how easy it would be for a player to interpret limited playing time as a reason to leave.
He was glad Rushing did not.
“I’m just glad that Elijah trusts the process here, knows that everybody develops at different times,” Tuioti said.
He used A’Mauri Washington as the example. Washington did not immediately become a starter, but Tuioti said he never heard him complain about repetitions or ask why the role had not arrived sooner. The development eventually produced the opportunity.
“A lot of that has to go back to the relationship,” Tuioti said. “Elijah’s got a great relationship with Coach Ham, Coach Lanning, myself, and he trusts the process.”
That answer fits almost perfectly with Lanning’s accountable-and-capable framework. Development does not happen according to recruiting ranking. It happens when a player becomes capable of doing the job and accountable enough that the staff trusts him to keep doing it.
The increasingly interesting part of Rushing’s camp is that his body and role are both moving closer to that point.
Oregon’s defensive-line culture may be helping make the depth possible
Tuioti eventually pulled the conversation away from technique, weight gain and personnel packages and toward something that has followed Oregon since Media Day: connection.
The four returning veterans matter because of what they can do on Saturdays, but Tuioti believes their larger value is the way they transfer their experience throughout the room. He sees older players coaching younger teammates between repetitions, helping them with details and treating another player’s improvement as something that strengthens the group rather than threatens their own role.
“If we have a team that’s like that, that’s connected, that care about each other, we can do some really, really special things,” Tuioti said.
That connection extends beyond the Hatfield-Dowlin Complex.
Tuioti described his home as a regular gathering place for the defensive line. Players come over, eat, play dominoes and have become hooked on Nertz, a competitive multiplayer variation of solitaire. Some have had the garage or front-door code for years. Tuioti joked that he has occasionally found himself making three dinners in one night because different players arrived hungry.
The story could easily be dismissed as a fun fall-camp anecdote, but it fits something Oregon players have been telling us since Media Day. Dave Iuli described connection as something created by enduring difficult things together. Hampton praised a defensive back room whose members celebrate one another despite competing for the same jobs. Terry has described a similar dynamic among offensive linemen. Tuioti’s room has simply built some of that connection around a dinner table and a deck of cards.
“I’m just glad that guys feel comfortable enough to come and just hang out,” Tuioti said. “It comes and goes really, really fast. And as a parent that’s had seven kids and now I only got a freshman at the house now, like you got to enjoy all the phases.”
“This is a really, really special year for us,” he added. “So we just want to make sure we do it the right way.”
That may also explain why Tuioti’s answer about Monday mattered so much.
Oregon has no shortage of talent. The quarterbacks see NFL-level defenders every day. The defensive line has established veterans and another wave pushing behind them. Position flexibility is giving the staff more possibilities, while competition is beginning to create actual consequences.
Talent was never going to be the difficult part to identify.
The harder question was what would happen once camp became tiring, the first scrimmage put 120 plays on everybody’s legs and the novelty of August wore off.
Practice 1 began with Lanning asking players who they could bring with them. The first scrimmage ended with players asking for more conditioning. Practice 10 opened the next phase with a defensive-line coach saying Oregon had just produced the best Monday he could remember following a scrimmage.
There are still significant questions. The offensive line remains worth watching against a defensive front that continues to make life difficult. Oregon eventually has to sort out the order behind Moore. Talented young defenders still have to turn flashes into roles, and the second scrimmage will give the staff another opportunity to discover whether corrections from the first one actually held.
But Practice 10 provided something useful before any of those questions are answered.
Saturday showed Oregon how it performed when the coaches made the game more real.
Monday showed how the Ducks responded after seeing the results.
At this point in fall camp, that may be every bit as valuable.


