College football has spent the last several years moving lines that once seemed permanent. Players can transfer without sitting out, schools can share revenue directly with athletes, NIL has changed what players can earn, and the old four-games-in-five-years eligibility model has given way to a five-for-five system. Almost everything about how a college football roster gets built looks different than it did when Dan Lanning took the Oregon job five years ago.

Then we reached a place that apparently made a lot of people in college football say enough. A series of court rulings opened the door for players who had already pursued NFL opportunities to return to college, including players who had signed professional contracts or spent time on professional rosters. Lanning was asked about it Saturday after Oregon’s second scrimmage, three days before the Big Ten formally drew its own line.

“Once you go to the NFL, to me, you’re in the NFL. You don’t get the opportunity to come back,” Lanning said. He eventually called the situation “unfair to the sport,” but the most interesting part of his answer came when he started talking about what that would mean for the players already on a college roster.

By Tuesday, the Big Ten and SEC had moved to keep former professionals from returning to their schools. The Big 12 followed Wednesday with a rule barring member schools from rostering athletes who had declared for a professional draft without withdrawing, appeared on a professional roster or signed a professional contract. The legal questions surrounding all of this are not finished, but the direction from the major conferences is pretty clear.

I agree with Lanning, although probably not for the reason that would have made the most sense 10 years ago. I do not think this needs to become another argument about protecting amateurism because that version of college football is already gone. The players can receive revenue sharing, NIL money and other benefits, and pretending the sport still fits neatly into the old amateur model does not make much sense anymore.

The better argument is simpler because the work has to mean something. Lanning’s point about roster limits matters here because teams spent the winter recruiting those rosters, then went through spring football, summer workouts and fall camp with the players who chose to be there. If an NFL player comes back in late August, the school does not simply create another chair in the meeting room. Somebody who has been there has to lose one.

That is where this stops being an abstract argument about eligibility and becomes a football argument about fairness. For the last three weeks, Oregon has asked players to compete for almost everything, and that competition only works if the result eventually counts.

The offensive line has spent camp trying to separate a group large enough that Lanning believes six, seven or eight players might be capable of winning football. Receivers have been told that playing time will go to the players who earn the trust of the other 10 people on the field, while Chris Hampton has moved defensive backs around and forced younger defenders to prove they can execute enough of the defense to stay on the field. Special teams repetitions have been charted because Joe Lorig has made it clear that one opportunity on Saturday may be the only opportunity a player gets.

After Oregon’s first scrimmage, Lanning reduced the evaluation to two questions: “Are you accountable and are you capable?” Players who could answer yes would get more opportunities, while players who could not would see their repetitions shrink. That became one of the clearest ways to understand the middle portion of Oregon’s camp because it connected competition directly to what happened next.

A player may spend an entire spring changing his body, learn another position during the summer and fight through three weeks of fall camp just to move from fifth to third in a position room. Another player may lose that same competition and have to decide whether he is willing to keep working when the role he wanted goes somewhere else. That can be uncomfortable, but everybody entered the competition knowing what the rules were.

Dropping a player with NFL experience into that room after the competition has essentially been completed changes those rules after the work has already been done. After watching Oregon go through this particular fall camp, I think that matters more than ever because almost every major theme has come back to earning trust, earning repetitions and making the work translate into a role.

Read more

Player-led leadership, difficult practices, daily improvement, competition and staying focused on what is directly in front of them have followed Oregon from Media Day through three weeks of camp. The difference now is that Lanning is starting to see the players deliver those messages themselves.

There probably was not going to be some enormous revelation Wednesday. Oregon is close enough to the season that the coaches are not about to give away a depth chart, Dan Lanning was not going to preview the Boise State game plan before game week officially begins, and most of the questions we have spent August asking are going to need an actual football game before they can be answered completely.

That made Lanning’s final availability before game week a little different from the others. Rather than learning something completely new about Oregon, I thought we got a chance to look backward at almost three weeks of fall camp and see which of the things Oregon talked about before the first practice actually survived it. The answer, at least from Lanning’s perspective, starts in almost exactly the same place the month began.

“We talked about player-led as we came in,” Lanning said. “That’s starting to really show itself. Throughout fall camp, I think it’s shown itself.”

That is a pretty good place to start a review of this camp because player-led leadership was never supposed to be a slogan Oregon hung on the wall in August. The point was eventually to reach a stage where coaches did not have to manufacture every ounce of urgency, toughness or accountability. Wednesday, Lanning gave us some actual examples.

“Whether it be a toughness standpoint, somebody goes down on a play and they wave off a substitution and say, ‘No, I’m going to stay in there.’ I saw that today with Dakorien,” Lanning said. “Whether it’s Poncho, we’re doing crowd noise period and he says, ‘No, I want the Turtlebox right up on us.’ Or there’s a period we don’t have scripted for crowd noise and the players are calling for it, calling for an extra rep.”

Three weeks ago, Oregon was talking about creating more alphas and asking players, “Who did you bring with you?” Now Lanning is describing players asking the coaches to make practice more difficult. That feels like progress.

The player-led idea finally has some football attached to it

We have spent a lot of August writing about fellowship, leadership and connection, but those things only matter if they eventually become visible when football gets uncomfortable. Lanning has been consistent about that from the beginning.

After the first practice, one of the things he talked about was creating more players capable of leading rather than allowing responsibility to live with only a handful of established veterans. His “Who did you bring with you?” question was really about whether Oregon’s best players could elevate somebody besides themselves. That idea has surfaced in almost every position room since.

Poncho Laloulu has talked about pouring what he has learned back into the younger offensive linemen. A’lique Terry described him taking younger players under his wing rather than worrying only about his own place in the lineup. Ross Douglas has talked about receivers contributing without the football. Rashad Wadood described a team where players genuinely want to become better for one another.

Now the examples are becoming less philosophical. Poncho does not merely tell us he wants the offensive line prepared for difficult environments. He asks Lanning to turn the crowd noise up. Dakorien Moore does not simply talk about toughness. Lanning sees him wave away a substitute. Players are asking for another repetition when the period is supposed to be over.

“There’s a lot of examples of it,” Lanning said. “A guy calling somebody else out, right? And I think you see a lot of that consistently on our team right now.”

That last part probably matters most. Any player can have one leadership moment during a three-week camp. Lanning is talking about seeing enough of them that he considers it part of the personality of the team.

There is still a big difference between doing that in August and doing it after a difficult loss, an injury or a reduced role in October. We have talked about that throughout camp too. But Oregon wanted evidence that the responsibility was beginning to move from the coaches to the players, and Lanning sounds like he believes he has seen it.

The defining characteristic of this camp may have been the absence of the bad day

One of Lanning’s more interesting answers Wednesday came when he was asked what he hopes this particular Oregon team eventually becomes known for. He did not give it a nickname or make some grand prediction about what the Ducks will look like in December. He talked about practice.

“The piece that I’ve seen with this group throughout fall camp that sticks out to me is we’ve stacked really good practices back to back to back,” Lanning said. “And I think that’s hard to do in fall camp when it becomes monotonous.”

I think that is worth remembering because we have heard versions of it from several coaches during camp. Tony Tuioti talked earlier this month about Oregon having a scrimmage on Saturday and then coming back with what he called an “elite practice” Monday. That surprised him because the natural response after a physical scrimmage is often for a team to drag a little when it comes back to work.

Lanning said Wednesday that has not been typical of this group.

“You have a great scrimmage, Mondays, because it might be down a little bit,” he said. “That hasn’t been the case with this group. They come out and they work on Monday, right? Okay, we have a really good Monday. What’s Tuesday going to look like? They come out and they have a really good Tuesday.”

Then he offered a final evaluation of Wednesday.

“I thought today was one of our better practices of the year and it was shorter, but these guys really attacked it with an intent and a focus,” Lanning said. “So being able to put great days back to back to back is something that this group’s really been able to do a good job of.”

That does not sound particularly exciting compared with a depth-chart announcement. It may be much more important. Oregon has enough talent that a great practice should not surprise anybody. The harder part is eliminating the practice where the team believes yesterday’s work somehow bought it the right to be average today.

That idea has followed us through camp. Mehringer called the offense a meritocracy and said players have to earn their roles every day. Lanning reduced evaluation after the first scrimmage to whether players were accountable and capable. Earlier this week, Mehringer’s response to an offensive practice that needed improvement was “reset, refocus.”

There has been very little language suggesting Oregon believes it has arrived. That may be intentional considering how much everyone outside the building keeps telling the Ducks they should accomplish.

The veterans appear to be setting the temperature

Lanning was asked whether Oregon’s experience has something to do with its ability to stack those practices. His answer was pretty straightforward.

“I think that there’s a benefit when veterans know how to work and what it looks like and hold people to that,” Lanning said. “Because everybody that’s just got here is looking around to see, okay, what’s everybody else doing? I’m going to kind of match that temperament.”

That may be one of the biggest differences between this roster and some of the earlier versions of Oregon under Lanning. There are players entering their third and fourth seasons inside the program who no longer need somebody to explain what an Oregon practice is supposed to look like.

Poncho knows. Matayo Uiagalelei knows. Teitum Tuioti knows. A’Mauri Washington knows. Jerry Mixon knows. Dante Moore has now spent multiple years inside the system, even if his path to becoming the starter was different. Those players become the visual instruction manual for everyone else.

“When you have guys that have been here and they are realizing what’s in front of them and what they have to attack,” Lanning said, “they pull everybody along or push everybody in front.”

That takes us all the way back to the beginning of camp again. “Who did you bring with you?” only works if the veterans know where everybody is supposed to be going. Three weeks later, Lanning seems much more comfortable that they do.

Dante Moore may be at his best when Oregon lets Dante Moore be Dante Moore

There have been several versions of the Dante Moore story during camp. We have talked about his command of the offense, his relationship with the players around him, his increased leadership and the difference between entering camp as the unquestioned starter rather than competing for the job.

Wednesday, Lanning added something a little less technical: joy.

“I think he’s gone through phases here throughout fall where it’s like, okay, I’m completely focused on what my job is,” Lanning said. “But part of being Dante, what makes him so special is being Dante.”

That is an interesting distinction. Quarterback preparation can become so serious that the process begins removing some of the instinct and personality that made the quarterback successful in the first place. Lanning does not want that with Moore.

“When he’s out there playing with joy, playing with confidence, knowing, ‘Hey, I’ve been through this a million times,’ we’ve given him a ton of different looks this fall that he hasn’t really seen consistently before,” Lanning said. “And I think that’s been really good for him as a player.”

That connects pretty directly to what Mehringer has been telling us. Earlier in camp, he called Moore’s understanding and football knowledge some of the best he has been around. More recently, Mehringer described the offense progressing from merely knowing a route or assignment to recognizing what the defense is showing and deciding what the offense wants to do about it.

Lanning is describing the emotional side of the same progression. Moore has seen enough looks that the answer does not have to feel new.

“When he’s out there playing with joy and has a level of focus and is demanding of the guys around him,” Lanning said, “we really separate as a team.”

That is a significant statement about a player whose position touches almost everything the offense does. Lanning also resisted turning Moore’s personality into some universal leadership requirement.

“I think it’s important for every player to be themselves,” he said. “Everybody’s got to figure out where they operate at the best level.”

For Moore, that apparently means the Ducks do not want to coach the joy out of him while trying to increase his command. There is a balance between playing loose and playing careless, and Lanning believes Moore is learning how to live in the right place between them.

The receiver room still sounds like a problem of abundance

We have probably written more about Oregon’s receivers than any offensive position during camp, and Wednesday did not change the basic conclusion. There are a lot of them.

Lanning was asked specifically about the players beyond the obvious top names, and he rattled through several without much hesitation.

“I think Messiah’s really come on the last few days,” Lanning said. “You’ve seen that from him. Jalen’s certainly had some flash plays to stick out. Gatlin’s had those. I mean, there’s several guys that have been able to do that. Iverson.”

The interesting part came next.

“We’ve got a really good group of wideouts,” Lanning said. “It’s going to be, okay, how do we figure out how to use these guys to their best ability and where do they fall in?”

That is almost exactly where Ross Douglas left the conversation last week. Douglas does not believe Oregon needs to manufacture a permanent No. 1 receiver because he thinks several players can become the primary answer depending on the play and matchup. He has talked about finding the best collection of five skill players, not merely identifying a fixed receiver rotation.

Mehringer has approached it similarly. His standard has been meritocracy, and his question about younger players has often come back to whether the other 10 players trust them enough to put them on the field.

Lanning added another wrinkle Wednesday by reminding everyone that September roles are not necessarily November roles.

“Guys’ roles, just like last year, roles can change throughout the season,” he said. “You see Malik Benson playing now on Sundays, right? And his role wasn’t big when the season started. It was huge before the season ended.”

That may be an especially important message for this receiver room. There are not enough targets to keep everybody statistically satisfied every week. Jalen Lott may flash in camp and still have Saturdays where he does not see the football. Messiah Hampton can make a jump and still be behind experienced players. Gatlin Bair’s speed can be obvious without requiring Oregon to build an entire package around him immediately.

The role in September is not necessarily the ceiling.

“I like that we have a lot of guys that are available,” Lanning said. “I like how they’re growing quickly.”

For a room this crowded, that is probably the healthiest way to look at it.

Practice was supposed to be harder than the game, and Oregon kept trying to manufacture that

One of the most consistent Lanning themes throughout August has been his desire to make practice more difficult than anything Oregon will encounter on Saturday. That started with the roster.

The offensive line has spent camp dealing with A’Mauri Washington, Bear Alexander, Matthew Johnson and the rest of a defensive front Oregon believes should make everybody across from it better. Poncho talked earlier this week about the benefit of seeing that level of player every day.

Wednesday, Lanning talked about another way Oregon has tried to create difficulty: noise.

The practice itself was shorter and more of what Lanning called a “spider’s practice,” but Oregon spent significant time working with crowd noise.

“We did a lot of crowd work noise today, and guys handled that really well,” Lanning said.

The special-teams component matters because game pressure is difficult to replicate when the stadium is empty. Oregon has tried anyway.

“A lot of our periods are going to end with, hey, offense is down three, so this is a kick situation at the end,” Lanning said. “We have pressure kicks throughout practice. Again, we try to make it harder in practice than it’s going to be in a game.”

That fits what Joe Lorig told us earlier in camp about manufacturing pressure before specialists actually inherit the job. It also helps explain why Oregon does not simply send the field-goal unit onto an empty field for a kicking period.

“It’s not just, okay, field goal, let’s go do field goal unit,” Lanning said. “They show up throughout practice, same thing with punt. So we try to create those pressure situations throughout.”

The results have not been perfect.

“At times we’ve handled it really well, at times we could be better,” he said. “But overall it’s been good.”

That might be as useful as another glowing evaluation. Pressure practice should occasionally expose a problem. If nothing ever goes wrong, Oregon probably has not made the situation difficult enough.

The coordinators have been practicing too

One of the better themes from early camp came when Mehringer talked about how working against Chris Hampton makes both coordinators better. They can request looks from one another, challenge each other with unscripted calls and find answers before another coaching staff forces them to do it during a game.

Hampton gave us his side of that Tuesday, talking about how open Mehringer has been to giving the defense the personnel grouping, pressure response or look it needs. Lanning said Wednesday that the coaches have been using camp in much the same way as the players.

“Part of being a great coach is also being like a lifelong learner,” Lanning said. “And I think we got two coaches in those positions with a great support group.”

He also emphasized that neither coordinator operates as though the title means the room stops contributing.

“They hear the voice of everybody in the room,” Lanning said. “They do a great job of taking feedback, accepting that and saying, okay, how can I make sure I incorporate it?”

Then there is the actual practice component.

“We’ve had a ton of situations where they’re calling it like it’s a game throughout practice and they’re learning from it,” Lanning said. “They’re making notes. They’re saying, ‘Hey, I could have done this better or I could have improved here.’ We talked through it as a staff and we watched film together and evaluate it.”

That is an important part of the camp story because Mehringer and Hampton are both entering the season in expanded roles. They have spent August installing systems, but they have also spent August rehearsing decisions.

There will eventually be a third-and-6 where the headset clock is running and neither coordinator gets 10 minutes to discuss the perfect answer. Oregon has tried to create those moments before Boise State does.

The transition to Boise State has started, but Oregon is not quite done with Oregon

After the second scrimmage, Lanning said the Ducks would begin moving toward opponent preparation later in the week while still keeping much of the work focused internally. That remains the plan.

“We’ll start as a coaching staff getting a little bit more focused on first opponent,” Lanning said. “But as players in general, it’ll be a little bit more still about us until we shift into that game-week mode.”

That is probably the clearest sign that fall camp is ending. The install becomes a game plan. The competition becomes a rotation. The mistake that gets corrected tomorrow eventually becomes the mistake that costs yards on Saturday.

Oregon will begin exposing players to some things the coaches believe they will see, but Lanning does not want every remaining practice snap to become Boise State-specific yet.

“We’ll expose them to a little bit of details, stuff that we think are going to show up,” he said. “Maybe not so much curtailed to just Boise or first opponents, but things that we need to make sure that we still clean up this week.”

That last part may be more important. There is still Oregon work left.

The players are excited. Lanning acknowledged that the closer the game gets, the harder that becomes to ignore.

“You’re always excited,” he said. “The closer you get, the more excited you get, right? I mean, that’s human nature.”

His next question is the one that matters.

“Are we prepared? Are we ready for that excitement that comes along with that?”

Lanning thinks Oregon is close. Not finished. Close.

The building outside gave Lanning a pretty good metaphor for the team inside

Lanning gets asked enough philosophical questions that he usually has an analogy ready, but the construction surrounding Oregon’s facility gave him a particularly fitting one Wednesday. He called it the difference between telescope goals and microscope goals.

“Obviously that building is not going to be done tomorrow, but it lets you know where we’re heading and what we’re building,” Lanning said. “And there’s something really cool happening there, but there’s work that’s done on that building every single day to make it elite.”

Then he connected it to the team.

“That same thing’s happening with our program right now,” Lanning said. “We have goals that we want to be able to accomplish. On the same note, we got to focus on what’s in front of us right now to be able to do it.”

That may be the cleanest summary of Oregon’s entire August. The telescope goal is obvious. Nobody needs Lanning to say “national championship” every morning for the players to understand what people expect from this roster. They know where Oregon finished the last few seasons. They know how the roster has been built. They know what is being said nationally.

The microscope has been much smaller. Win today’s rep. Find the best five offensive linemen. Finish the drive. Protect the football. Get off the field on third down. Make the pressure kick. Bring somebody with you. Ask for another rep.

Those things do not sound anything like a national championship. That is probably why Lanning keeps talking about them.

Fall camp began with possibilities. It ends with responsibility

When Oregon opened camp, almost everything was expansive. There were six to eight offensive linemen who might be above the line. Receivers were competing across the room. Young defensive backs were trying to prove they could handle responsibility. The quarterback room had unusual depth. Mehringer was talking about all the things Oregon could potentially do with versatile personnel.

Three weeks later, the questions have narrowed. Who can the other 10 players trust? Which offensive linemen actually fit together? Which receivers can contribute when they do not get the ball? Which defenders can execute the call consistently enough that Hampton does not need to protect them? Which specialists can handle the kick when the situation has been made uncomfortable? And maybe most importantly, which players can carry the standard without a coach standing beside them?

Lanning opened Wednesday by calling it a good day overall. The practice was short, the Ducks worked noise and situational football, and there was no dramatic proclamation that camp had produced the finished product. That would have been inconsistent with almost everything he has said for three weeks.

Instead, he sounded like a coach whose team is approaching the point where preparation has to become performance.

“I mean, you become a better team each and every day,” Lanning said while looking back at camp. “There’s been really good back and forth, whether it’s offense, defense, special teams. I think in all those areas, we’re proving it in a lot of situations that we’re making sure we expose our players to.”

Then he gave the assessment that probably matters most entering the final days before game week.

“Overall, I think we have a group that’s hungry and working really hard.”

That sounds remarkably similar to the team Oregon wanted to build when everyone gathered for Media Day three weeks ago. The difference is that Lanning has now watched it practice. And perhaps the best sign of what happened during those practices is that some of the messages we spent August hearing from the coaches are starting to come back through the players.

Turn the noise up. Give us another rep. I’m staying in.

That may be about as good a place as any for fall camp to end.

Dante Moore’s second year, Evan Stewart’s return, Dierre Hill Jr.’s versatility and an offensive line still working toward its best five give Drew Mehringer a chance to attack those areas without rebuilding an offense that already worked.

I have spent a lot of August thinking about what Oregon’s offense is supposed to become under Drew Mehringer, and I keep coming back to the possibility that the answer is not particularly dramatic. That probably sounds strange given the personnel Oregon can put on the field, but I am becoming less convinced that some massive schematic change is necessary for this offense to take another step.

Oregon has a returning quarterback who completed almost 72% of his passes, two sophomore running backs who looked ready for much larger roles before their freshman seasons were finished, one of the country’s most interesting receiver rooms and a tight end in Jamari Johnson who could become a central piece of the passing game. Mehringer also has an idea board sitting in the offensive staff room where coaches can put down concepts they would like to try, yet when he talked about it this week, the question he emphasized was not whether Oregon can run something. It was whether Oregon actually needs it.

That sounds a lot like what he told us during the first week of camp when he called complexity a “double-edged sword” and wondered aloud what good 100 million plays would do if the offense could not get enough repetitions to execute them properly. Three weeks later, the 2025 numbers give us a much better idea of what he may be trying to solve.

Oregon was already really good, which makes the weaknesses more interesting

Read more

Oregon already had one of college football's better offenses in 2025. A deeper receiver room, another year for Dante Moore and more flexibility throughout the skill positions could make the Ducks more difficult to solve, but the numbers also point toward a few places where real improvement still has to happen.

There is an easy way to preview Oregon’s offense this season. Dante Moore is back, Jordon Davison and Dierre Hill Jr. give the Ducks two dangerous running backs, Evan Stewart returns to a receiver room that suddenly looks incredibly deep and Poncho Laloulu anchors an offensive line with plenty of talent.

Put all of that together and predicting a lot of points would not exactly be taking a risk. I think there is a more interesting way to look at it, though, because Oregon already scored plenty of points last season.

The Ducks averaged 36.9 points and 452.2 yards per game, gained 6.9 yards every time they snapped the football and produced one of the most explosive offenses in the country. They averaged 198.6 yards rushing and another 253.6 through the air while finishing 13-2.

The opponent-adjusted numbers were just as impressive. FEI ranked Oregon fifth nationally in offensive efficiency, while the Ducks averaged 3.25 points per non-garbage possession against FBS opponents, eighth nationally.

That is a pretty high starting point for Drew Mehringer. The question is not how Oregon fixes an offense that did not work, but how it takes something that was already very good and makes it harder for elite defenses to push into uncomfortable situations.

The 2025 numbers show where there is still room

Success rate is one number I keep coming back to when looking at last season.

Oregon finished with a 47.8% offensive success rate, 17th nationally, and a 49% passing success rate that ranked 13th. The Ducks were also 36th in points per scoring opportunity at 4.1.

Those are good numbers, but they are not quite as overwhelming as 36.9 points and 6.9 yards per play might suggest. The difference helps explain something we saw at times last season: Oregon could create huge chunks of offense without every possession feeling equally efficient.

The red-zone numbers provide another clue. Oregon entered the red zone 62 times and scored 41 touchdowns, converting 53 of those possessions into some kind of score.

There is room in there.

That is why something Mehringer said during the first week of camp still matters to me. He described the basics of Oregon’s offense as protecting the football and creating explosive plays, but then added that the Ducks needed to “find ways to run the football at times when we need to” and could improve once they got into the red zone.

He was not describing a broken offense. He was identifying the difference between moving the football and finishing the job.

Dante Moore does not have to become a different quarterback

Moore’s first full season as Oregon’s starter was already very good. He completed 296 of 412 passes for 3,565 yards, 30 touchdowns and 10 interceptions, finishing with a 71.8% completion rate and a 163.7 passer rating.

There is an interesting recent Oregon comparison in those numbers. Bo Nix posted a 165.7 passer rating during his first Oregon season in 2022 before making a substantial jump in 2023, when the game seemed to slow down for him and his command of the offense became as important as his physical ability.

I am not suggesting Moore has to reproduce Nix’s statistical jump for Oregon to win a championship. I am more interested in whether the second year eliminates some of the plays that hurt the offense a year ago.

Ten interceptions can come down. Oregon allowed 19 sacks, and while sacks are never solely a quarterback statistic, Moore can help the offensive line through quicker recognition, pocket movement and knowing when the best answer is simply getting rid of the ball.

That is where three weeks of camp begin connecting to the analytics.

Mehringer has said Moore’s greatest growth has been in leadership, but he also called his football knowledge “some of the best I have ever been around.” More recently, he described an offense moving beyond simply knowing an assignment and toward recognizing defensive looks, communicating changes and understanding how the entire play should adjust.

Moore may not need more spectacular plays in 2026. Oregon could become better simply because fewer snaps become difficult ones.

The receiver room could change the shape of the offense

Last season, Oregon increasingly leaned on multiple-tight-end personnel as the receiver room became thinner. Dakorien Moore missed time and was not completely healthy late in the season, while the Ducks had the luxury of Kenyon Sadiq and Jamari Johnson at tight end.

There was nothing wrong with adapting to the personnel available. Oregon still produced one of the country’s best offenses, but 2026 gives Mehringer a very different set of choices.

Stewart is back and has received some of the strongest praise of anyone in camp. Dakorien Moore returns after catching 34 passes for 497 yards as a freshman, while Jeremiah McClellan caught 38 for 557 and grew into a much larger role as the season progressed.

Ross Douglas has spent August pushing back against the idea that Oregon has to declare one of them the permanent No. 1 receiver.

“I do not think we necessarily need to have a true number one,” Douglas said. “I think we have a collection of guys who could hurt you in multiple ways.”

I think that is more than a receiver coach trying to keep everybody happy.

Oregon does not need to decide before the season that Stewart must get 12 targets or that Dakorien Moore has to become the deep threat on every passing concept. If Stewart, Moore and McClellan can all move around the formation and play winning football without the ball, the defense can help determine which receiver becomes the featured player on a particular snap.

Stewart makes that especially interesting because Mehringer said this week that he is playing more positions than he did in 2024. A player with Stewart’s ability becomes considerably harder to account for if Oregon does not have to leave him in the same place simply to keep the offense organized.

Davison and Hill keep Oregon from becoming one-dimensional

A deeper receiver room does not mean Oregon should abandon the running game. Davison and Hill may actually make all of the receiving talent more dangerous.

Davison rushed for 667 yards and 15 touchdowns on 113 carries as a freshman, while Hill produced 656 yards on just 75 attempts. Hill averaged 8.75 yards per carry, giving Oregon one of the most explosive young backs in college football.

They also do not have to be used the same way.

Davison gives Oregon a physical answer when the field gets smaller or the defense knows a run may be coming. Hill has enough speed and receiving ability that Mehringer has already talked about finding ways to use him outside the traditional running-back role.

“You see this burst down the field, and it is like, hey, we’ve got to do something with this guy,” Mehringer said earlier in camp.

That is where this offense starts becoming more interesting than simply lining up in three-receiver sets and throwing more often.

Hill can leave the backfield. Stewart can change receiver positions. Johnson can line up attached or flex away from the formation. Oregon can change what the offense looks like without changing all 11 players.

That fits Mehringer’s philosophy almost perfectly.

“Complexity is a little bit of a double-edged sword,” he said earlier in camp while questioning how well an offense can execute if it tries to carry too many different plays.

The better solution may be players who make the same playbook look different.

Jamari Johnson may become even more useful

If Oregon puts a third receiver on the field more often, it would be easy to assume the tight end becomes less important. I think Johnson could become more important precisely because Oregon does not have to tell the defense how it intends to use him.

Jack Smith described the tight end during camp as “the second quarterback” because of everything the position has to process.

“We ask our guys to do a lot, whether it is pass pro, run blocking, routes, screen timing,” Smith said.

That versatility gives Mehringer another way to hide intent.

Johnson can keep the run threat intact while still becoming a receiving matchup against a linebacker or safety. Oregon can move him away from the formation without substituting, then bring him back inside when it wants more physicality.

The names behind Johnson are less established, but Marcus Dixon and Kendre Harrison give Oregon two very different options while Andrew Olesh continues developing. That could allow Oregon to use a second tight end when there is a specific reason for it rather than feeling compelled to live in heavier personnel.

The offensive line is still the piece I want to see

There is plenty to like up front, beginning with Poncho Laloulu. Oregon allowed only 19 sacks last season while averaging 5.4 yards per rush, and the returning line has individual players with significant experience.

Dave Iuli gives the Ducks another veteran interior presence, while Fox Crader showed enough in limited work last season to make the optimism at left tackle understandable. The question throughout August has not sounded like whether Oregon has five capable linemen, but which five work best together.

A’lique Terry has consistently called the issue cohesion.

“The biggest improvement, obviously, would just cohesion,” Terry said earlier in camp, talking about finding the right mesh and the right pairs. He later said the Ducks would begin “gluing it up a little bit more” once players separated themselves.

That process is still happening. Tommy Tofi has worked at four offensive-line positions other than center, Oregon has continued developing multiple backup-center options and Poncho has described a room with more players capable of stepping in than some people might realize.

Eventually, however, flexibility has to become chemistry.

If Oregon can protect Moore when opponents know the Ducks have to throw and run the football when everyone in the stadium expects Davison to get it, most of my questions about this offense become much easier to answer.

Oregon may not need more offense

That is probably where I land after putting the 2025 numbers next to everything we have heard since Media Day.

Oregon does not need to manufacture another 100 yards of offense each week. The Ducks were already fifth nationally in opponent-adjusted offensive efficiency and eighth in points per drive while averaging almost 37 points.

The improvement can be smaller and still matter enormously.

Moore can eliminate a few negative plays. Oregon can turn several more red-zone possessions into touchdowns. The offensive line can become more cohesive, while the receiver room gives Moore easier answers and Hill forces defenses to account for him wherever he happens to line up.

Those changes would not make the offense look completely different from the one we watched last season. They could make it much more difficult to solve, and for an offense that was already one of the country’s best, that may be all Oregon really needs.

Chris Hampton says the Ducks will begin sorting the depth chart Friday, but Tuesday’s interviews offered better clues about what will determine those decisions. Execution and consistency remain the priority, Devon Jackson’s teammates are backing up the standard he has set for himself and Koi Perich looks increasingly comfortable doing almost everything Oregon asks of him.

There was something Drew Mehringer said Monday that stayed with me while listening to Chris Hampton a day later.

Mehringer told us about the idea board in Oregon’s offensive staff room, a place where coaches can put down concepts they would like to try. There are apparently plenty of ideas on it, but his bigger question at this point in camp is whether Oregon actually needs all of them.

Hampton gave us something close to the defensive version Tuesday when he was asked whether Oregon might hold anything back against Boise State.

“No, I mean, Boise State’s an unbelievable football team,” Hampton said. “I don’t think there’ll be anything we can hold back. Those guys almost beat us last time they came here. I think we’ll have to unload, if that makes sense.”

Then Hampton got to the part of the answer I found more interesting.

“There’s no secrets in football,” he said. “Cover three is cover three. Cover one is cover one. A lot of times it’s who’s running cover one. Who’s running cover three? Who’s rushing that passer?”

That sounds pretty simple for a defensive coordinator who has spent most of August installing a defense with enough veteran experience to handle quite a bit. I think the simplicity is probably intentional.

Earlier in camp, both Hampton and Mehringer talked about how much their respective groups could carry schematically. Now, with game preparation almost here, both sound more interested in finding out which players can execute what has already been installed.

Hampton is still more concerned with consistency than who won practice

Evan Stewart said Monday that the defense had been “whooping” the offense lately, which gave Hampton a chance Tuesday to claim a little victory for his side. He did not seem very interested in doing that.

“Stew was maybe just a prisoner of the moment,” Hampton said. “I think we had the better of them one day. They’ve had the better of us some days. I think it’s been a lot of good back and forth.”

That answer fits what we have heard throughout camp. The offense has had days where it looked good, the defense has had days where it controlled practice and neither side seems particularly interested in making those results mean much once the next practice begins.

What Hampton does care about is whether the defense can eliminate the stretches where it falls off.

“I think we’re in a good spot,” he said. “I don’t think we’re a finished product yet of where we want to be, which is fine. I think we’ve had some highs. We’ve had some lows. So trying to be consistent, I think that was the big message this morning. Can we be a consistent defense?”

That is probably a more useful assessment than trying to decide whether the defense is ahead of the offense.

Hampton also went back to the same basic football things he discussed when we first heard from him early in camp.

“I think we’ve done a great job attacking the football,” he said. “I think I’ve seen us play with great physicality. We’ve had some really good effort from some guys at times. This has been an easy group to coach. We’re doing the basics good. We’re lining up right, getting our hands in the dirt, playing with technique and fundamentals, eyes on our keys.”

There is nothing complicated in that list.

Oregon has plenty of complicated defensive answers if Hampton wants them. The standard he continues to describe is much less interesting on a whiteboard: line up correctly, play with good eyes, use the right technique, run to the football and finish.

If Oregon does those things with this roster, Hampton seems to believe the rest will take care of itself.

Friday should finally give Oregon something resembling a real depth chart

We have spent most of August trying to figure out when Oregon would move from broad competition into something closer to an actual depth chart. Hampton gave us the clearest timeline yet.

“We’ve got a lot of guys still rolling out,” he said. “We haven’t done a depth chart yet. We’ll probably start that on Friday where we start separating the who’s in the ones, who’s in the twos, et cetera.”

I do not think that means Hampton and the staff have no idea who their best players are until Friday. Coaches have been evaluating every snap since camp began, and some of these competitions are almost certainly further along internally than they are publicly.

What Friday probably changes is how the repetitions begin to get distributed.

“We’ve got a lot of quality football players,” Hampton said. “So I think the challenging part for us is finding roles for everybody, and that’s what we’re trying to do.”

That sounds less like a staff searching for starters and more like one deciding how many players it can actually use.

STAR may be the best example. Hampton mentioned Carl Williams IV, Davon Benjamin and Zach Grisham when he was asked about the competition and made it clear he does not expect the position to belong to one player all season.

“I think it’s going to be multiple guys do it,” Hampton said. “I really do. I think that Carl’s done a great job. Davon’s done a great job. Zach Grisham’s done a great job.”

Cornerback appears to have some of the same depth.

“Obviously Finney and Ify started the majority of the season last year,” Hampton said. “Na’eem’s had an unbelievable camp. Really proud of him. He’s playing his best football right now. Dorian Brew, Aaron Scott. So we’ve got quality depth.”

Hampton also brought up Tre Watson, the junior-college addition, saying he has shown “a lot of good flashes” during camp.

That is why simply asking who starts may not tell us enough about this defense. Oregon appears to have enough players at several positions that Friday’s depth chart may establish an order without necessarily limiting who plays.

Davon Benjamin sounds increasingly like a freshman Oregon intends to use

Hampton did not hesitate much when he was asked why Davon Benjamin appears ready to help as a freshman.

“I think he’s got extreme confidence,” Hampton said. “I think he’s obviously got the skill set. A lot of freshmen have the skill set, but there’s times that there’s a learning curve. He’s a smart individual. He’s really confident. He’s got some swagger to him. I think he’ll be able to help us this year.”

I think the confidence part is probably the most important piece of that answer.

Hampton has talked since early in camp about not overloading young defensive backs just because they are athletic enough to do several things. The staff would rather let a young player become confident in something, then continue adding responsibilities as he proves he can handle them.

Perich sees the same thing in Benjamin.

“I see a level of maturity with Davon,” Perich said. “He came in, obviously, a freshman, a little jittery, but he’s grown very fast, and I love the way he plays. He plays mean, he plays fast, and he’s going to be a really great player.”

That does not necessarily mean Benjamin is about to become a 60-snap player against Boise State. With Williams and Grisham also capable of playing STAR, Oregon may not need him to be.

It does sound as though he has done enough to make himself part of the discussion about who can actually help this season rather than simply who will be good eventually.

The best evidence about Devon Jackson came from Koi Perich

Jackson has talked since spring about wanting to become a more physical player, and Tuesday he made it clear that he does not believe saying it publicly means very much.

“Honestly, I haven’t really done anything different,” Jackson said when asked about his growth as a leader. “You’re going to believe who you see work, and I would want my teammates to see how I work and how I show up every day and believe that.”

He took the thought quite a bit further.

“I’m not a fan of big rah-rah guys that do stuff for social media or in front of coaches,” Jackson said. “If your teammates don’t believe down in their hearts that you’re who you say you are, they’re not going to follow me.” social media or in front of coaches,” Jackson said. “If your teammates don’t believe down in their hearts that you’re who you say you are, they’re not going to follow me.”

That is a pretty strong statement about how Jackson views leadership.

He does not want to tell teammates he is physical. He wants them to feel it. He does not want to tell them he works hard. He wants them to see it.

A few minutes later, Jackson left and Perich sat down.

Perich was asked specifically whether Jackson has become the more violent, physical linebacker he said he wanted to be during the spring.

“I would say Devon Jackson, what I’ve seen has taken a big step,” Perich said. “Each day he comes with a ferocious, just an appearance to him. Obviously he wore this dark visor. It was pretty sick. But, yeah, he is definitely a physical linebacker. He brings it really every day.”

Perich had another answer later that probably matters even more.

“I feel like you just see it, just the way he prepares,” he said. “Obviously, this offseason working together each morning, just watching him prepare and the way he attacks a workout, a practice. Everything he does is at 100 percent.”

That is almost exactly the standard Jackson had described for himself.

Dan Lanning put a lot on Jackson at Media Day when he said the defense could be really good if Jackson became the player Oregon believes he can be. Hampton also sounded pretty confident Tuesday that Jackson is headed in the right direction.

“I’m really proud of him,” Hampton said. “I think he’s going to have a great season for us. He and I have had some one-on-one talks. We’ve watched some film together. Coach Michalowski has done a great job of helping him develop. I think his confidence is high right now, and I think he’s going to play his best football this season.”

Jackson is not talking like someone satisfied with praise.

“If I can be the player that I know I can be and the coaches believe I can be, then we can do something special,” he said. “But you still got to work for it. Ain’t nobody going to hand that to me. Like, no one’s handed that to me in five years I’ve been here. You got to work at it every day. Rent’s due every day.”

That is probably where his urgency comes from.

Jackson knows exactly what this season means for him

There was another part of Jackson’s interview that I thought was more revealing than almost anything schematic we heard Tuesday.

He was asked how eager he is to finally get into a game and show what he can do as a starter.

“Man, I’m ready,” Jackson said. “I’m ready to just show it every play because this is it. This is the only guarantee that I have for myself.”

Jackson then compared his situation with some of Oregon’s more established players.

“I wasn’t a Dante or a Stew or a Poncho or all those other guys that they could have went to the league,” he said. “I’m just being honest. This is do or die for me. And so, like, I have to bring it every day. There is no other option.”

That kind of urgency can go in two directions.

A player can begin chasing plays and trying to prove himself on every snap, which is usually how linebackers end up out of position. Or the urgency can make preparation more important because the player understands he cannot waste a day.

Everything Jackson said Tuesday points toward the second.

“This is my last first game in college,” he said later. “There’s not a guarantee I may get another first game. So I got to go out there and prove it for myself. Just prove it to myself. I don’t care what nobody else thinks.”

There is a lot of preseason attention on Oregon’s defensive front and secondary. Jackson may be one of the more important players in determining how completely all of that talent fits together.

Koi Perich looks much more comfortable inside the defense than he did in spring

Perich was already an established college football player when he arrived at Oregon, but he was still learning a new defensive language in the spring. Tuesday he sounded like a player who has moved considerably further into the system.

“I would say especially this past few days, even this past few weeks, I’ve definitely learned my way around this playbook,” Perich said. “I feel like I’ve handled myself with a level of maturity throughout the whole time learning it, learning from my mistakes throughout spring ball and fall camp, summer. Just keep on growing throughout that.”

Then he described something that I think is a better indication of defensive comfort than simply saying he knows the playbook.

“If we’re not even signaling or talking, we’re still communicating with each other through hand signals,” Perich said. “So it’s pretty cool.”

That is usually what happens when players begin understanding the defense beyond the call itself.

Hampton is seeing the same thing.

“I think he can do it all,” Hampton said when asked about Perich’s versatility. “He’s shown the ability to cover in the slot. He can tackle. He’s been extremely physical. He’s made a lot of plays on the ball. He’s very ball aware. He’s got some savviness to him.”

Hampton finished that answer with one of the stronger evaluations he has given anyone during camp.

“I don’t see a lot of flaws in his game.”

The interesting part is that Perich still would not make any grand declaration about what Oregon’s defense is going to become.

“I really hope we come out with a ferocious tenacity,” Perich said. “Obviously, it’s going to take us what we see game one. I’m not going to say what we are. We have to really show it.”

That answer sounds a lot like the things Lanning and Hampton have been saying for three weeks.

Perich’s golf simulator gives us a small look at what “connection” actually means

Hampton probably did not expect one of his Tuesday answers to turn into a discussion about golf, but it gave us a useful little window into Perich’s transition to Oregon.

Perich wanted a place with a garage because he brought a golf simulator with him. Hampton said it has turned into a group activity for several defensive backs, including Trey McNutt, Peyton Woodyard and Brandon Finney Jr., while Dante Moore apparently plays with the group quite a bit as well.

Perich laughed when asked whether Hampton’s claim that he is the best golfer among the players was accurate.

“Definitely,” Perich said before admitting Mehringer has beaten him. “Other than that, no player has beat me. I’m willing to give everybody a shot.”

The football part of the story is not whether Perich can hit a driver.

He said the simulator has helped him connect with teammates and bring different players together away from the facility. That is a very ordinary example of the fellowship and player connection Oregon has talked about since Media Day, and sometimes the ordinary examples tell us more than another discussion about culture.

Perich also talked about how much his teammates have helped him since arriving.

“When they’re giving 100 percent, I see that, oh, let me go give a little more,” he said. “It just makes it easy when you’ve got a bunch of guys just willing to come out each and every day with an attacking mindset.”

That is probably a better explanation for why Perich seems comfortable so quickly than anything we could manufacture from the transfer portal.

Dorian Brew and Trey McNutt are still pushing for roles

One of the better questions Hampton received Tuesday was about players who have not been discussed quite as much recently.

Dorian Brew and Trey McNutt were the two names.

“Tremendously improved,” Hampton said. “I think they’re both helping us out. Just watching out there at practice, Dorian Brew had a great day out there today on the field.”

Hampton then made a point of acknowledging the question.

“That’s a great question,” he said. “I got some guys that sometimes people don’t ask about as much. I think Trey McNutt’s continuing to improve, doing a great job for us, and I think they both can have roles for us this season.”

That is worth remembering when Friday’s depth-chart sorting begins.

Oregon has enough established names in the secondary that it would be easy to assume younger players who are not running with the obvious first group have been eliminated from consideration. Hampton does not talk like that.

A role might mean five snaps, 15 snaps, special teams or a package built around a specific skill. On a roster this deep, the question is probably less about whether every player starts and more about whether Hampton can find enough situations where the depth actually helps Oregon win.

Brandon Smith apparently gave the defense a rough Monday

One of the best practice nuggets Tuesday came from Jackson talking about someone on the other side of the ball.

Freshman running back Brandon Smith has been generating some positive talk during camp, and Jackson was asked what Smith has looked like from the perspective of the linebackers trying to tackle him.

“Man, B. Smith, that’s my dog, bro,” Jackson said. “I got to mess with him on a daily basis.”

Then Jackson laughed and offered a fairly colorful description of Monday’s practice.

“He tore it yesterday,” Jackson said. “He scored like three times, had like, felt like 300 yards. He freaking embarrassed us yesterday.”

Nobody should turn that into a statistical report from a closed practice. Jackson was clearly exaggerating to make the point that Smith had a very good day.

The point is still useful.

Smith is another freshman who keeps appearing in conversations late in camp, and Jackson believes the talent is real.

“He’s a really good player,” Jackson said. “That’s somebody that he puts his head down and works. That’s somebody that, like, he’s going to be a good player for us for sure.”

It also adds a little evidence to Hampton pushing back on Stewart’s claim that the defense has been dominating practice lately.

There has apparently been plenty of back and forth.

Playing behind this defensive line could make Devon Jackson’s job a lot easier

Jackson gave a pretty simple explanation for why he is excited about playing behind Oregon’s defensive front.

He mentioned A’Mauri Washington and Bear Alexander, then explained what their presence can do for a linebacker.

“It makes my job easy playing behind A’Mauri and Bear,” Jackson said. “They got to hold those doubles, you know, for an O-line. But it’s like, yeah, you can’t climb up to me. You got to deal with them boys up front.”

That matters quite a bit for a linebacker whose game is built around playing fast and physical.

If Oregon’s defensive tackles force guards and centers to remain engaged at the line of scrimmage, Jackson gets more opportunities to run downhill without having to defeat a 300-pound blocker before reaching the ball carrier.

He also thinks the experience on the defense extends much further than the most recognizable names.

“A’Mauri’s in his fourth year. Bear’s in his fifth year of school. Obviously second year here. Teitum’s fourth year here. Matayo’s fourth year here. Jerry’s fourth year here,” Jackson said. “Guys are also in the linebacker room, Dylan Williams, third year here. Guys have been here. They might not get as much love as they might want, but people have been here and they’ve been working.”

Then Jackson gave us the expectation that comes with all of that experience.

“Now it’s just time for not just the quote-unquote starters to show it, but everybody to show it.”

That fits where Hampton says the defense is headed Friday.

Hampton and Mehringer are still helping each other prepare

There was also a good continuation Tuesday from something Mehringer discussed early in camp.

Mehringer has talked about how he and Hampton use practice to challenge one another, especially during unscripted periods when both coordinators have to react rather than simply call something from a predetermined script.

Hampton said that relationship has continued.

“Drew has been great to work with,” he said. “Sometimes you can work with a coordinator and they want this thing and it’s their way or the highway and they’re selfish, and Drew is not at all.”

Hampton said the two regularly ask each other to show specific looks.

“I need to see this,” Hampton said. “Hey, I need to see this pressure. I need to see this personnel grouping on this play.”

That is another reason I keep coming back to the similarities in what both coordinators are saying.

They are not just trying to beat each other during practice. They are using the other side of the ball to expose problems now, while there is still time to fix them.

Hampton expects Oregon to use what it has against Boise State

I thought Hampton’s answer about Boise State was useful because it pushed back against the idea that Oregon will treat the opener as an opportunity to hide its better defensive answers.

He remembers how close the last meeting was.

“I don’t think there’ll be anything we can hold back,” Hampton said. “Those guys almost beat us last time they came here.”

That does not mean Oregon is going to dump every pressure or coverage it has installed into one game.

It does mean Hampton does not sound interested in approaching Boise State as though Oregon can simply line up in something generic and wait for talent to take over.

His point that “there’s no secrets in football” also fits everything else he said Tuesday.

The advantage is not that Oregon knows what cover one is and Boise State does not.

The advantage has to be that Oregon has better players executing it correctly.

Evan Stewart now has another endorsement from the defensive side

At this point, the Evan Stewart praise has come from enough different directions that it is becoming difficult to dismiss as camp talk.

Perich was asked what Stewart looks like from the defensive side and immediately answered with probably the strongest endorsement we have heard yet.

“Evan Stewart is a problem,” Perich said. “And he is going to be a problem.”

Perich was not done.

“That man has the best feet I’ve seen at a wide receiver,” he said. “Obviously, if he didn’t get hurt this past year, you probably wouldn’t have seen him this year. He is going to be one of the best receivers in the country, and I fully believe he is one of the best receivers in the country.”

We heard Mehringer praise Stewart Monday. Poncho talked about how much Stewart has grown as a leader and how his voice now carries on the practice field. Lanning has repeatedly brought up the camp Stewart has had.

Now one of the defensive backs trying to deal with him every day is saying essentially the same thing.

There will eventually be a point where Oregon has to prove all of this against somebody else.

We are about there.

What I think we learned Tuesday

The easiest story from Practice 16 would be that Oregon believes its defense is deep and talented. We knew that before practice started.

The more interesting part is that Hampton finally gave us a date when some of that depth is going to begin getting sorted more formally. Friday should start separating ones and twos, even though Hampton still expects multiple players to have roles at positions such as STAR and corner.

I also think we got another clue about where both sides of the football are headed schematically.

Mehringer spent Monday talking about whether Oregon actually needs every idea it can create. Hampton followed Tuesday by saying there are no secrets in football and that cover three is still cover three; what changes is who is playing it.

That sounds like a team reaching the point where installation is becoming less important than execution.

And maybe the best evidence of what Oregon has spent all offseason trying to build came from Jackson and Perich.

Jackson said he does not want teammates following him because of what he says in front of a microphone. He wants them to believe him because they watch the way he works and feel the physicality he brings every day.

Then Jackson left the room, Perich sat down and described almost exactly that player.

There are a lot of things coaches can tell us during fall camp.

Sometimes the better answer comes when the teammate walks in next and confirms it.

Take One: Sometimes the message is meant for the players

In 2022, we heard throughout fall camp that there was a real competition between Bo Nix and Ty Thompson for the starting quarterback job in Dan Lanning’s first season at Oregon. Looking back, it seems pretty clear that competition probably was not nearly as close as it was presented publicly, and I think that experience is worth remembering when we try to interpret everything coaches tell us during August.

That does not mean Lanning or his staff are being dishonest. I think it means press conferences serve more than one purpose, and sometimes the answer to a question is intended just as much for the players standing inside the building as it is for those of us trying to write about them. After three weeks of listening to Oregon coaches and players, I am starting to wonder if some of the messaging around competition, roles and even how far this team still has to go is designed to keep everyone from getting too comfortable.

The expectations around this team are enormous. Oregon is being picked by multiple national writers and analysts to win the national championship, the defensive line has been described as potentially elite, the receiver room may be as deep as any in the country and the roster is loaded with players who arrived with significant recruiting reputations. There is nothing wrong with any of that, but there is always some danger when players begin hearing more about what they are supposed to become than what they still have to do.

That may help explain why the language from inside the program has been so consistent. Mehringer has talked about meritocracy and said nobody owns a job. Lanning has repeatedly come back to whether players are accountable and capable. We have heard “good enough is old enough,” “reset and refocus,” “be where your feet are,” and Monday Mehringer added another simple answer when discussing how a player earns playing time: play well.

None of those messages are especially complicated, and I think that is probably the point.

Read more

Drew Mehringer still has an idea board full of possibilities, but Monday’s interviews with Mehringer, Evan Stewart and Poncho Laloulu offered a better clue about what Oregon’s offense may actually look like when the games begin.

I went into Monday expecting most of the conversation to come back to what Dan Lanning said after the second scrimmage. The offense had moved the football but did not finish enough drives, the offensive line was still sorting through combinations and Lanning had again talked about the value of practicing against a defensive front that is supposed to make Saturdays easier.

We got plenty of that, but I thought the three interviews went somewhere a little more interesting. Drew Mehringer, Evan Stewart and Poncho Laloulu were talking about different parts of the offense, yet they kept coming back to how much Oregon can ask players to do without slowing them down and how much trust is required before all of those possibilities can actually become part of the offense.

I think that may be one of the better clues we have gotten about where Oregon is headed. The Ducks may not be trying to become more complicated by adding an endless number of plays; they may be trying to make the same personnel capable of giving them more answers.

Mehringer has plenty of ideas, but the question now is whether Oregon needs them

The last time we heard extensively from Mehringer earlier in camp, he called complexity a “double-edged sword.” Oregon can carry as much offense as the coaches can dream up, but every additional play also takes repetitions away from something already in the offense, and eventually the value of having another answer becomes smaller than the value of executing the answers you already have.

Monday, Mehringer gave us a pretty good look at what that process actually looks like inside the offensive staff room.

“You know, I think that it’s always a fine line and a balance of, you know, we could do this. And really the question is, do we need to do it?” Mehringer said. “There’s always ideas. Like I have an idea board in the offensive staff room where guys are like, ‘Hey dude, this play would be awesome.’ Right? And you’re like, ‘Okay, great. Like, what are we going to put that in?’ You know, I don’t know.”

I like that answer because it sounds a lot different from a coordinator trying to prove how much offense he knows. Mehringer obviously has no shortage of things he would like to try, but the season is close enough now that “that would be a cool play” is probably not a good enough reason to spend practice time on it.

He also made clear that the extra offseason time has allowed Oregon to work through much more than plays. The Ducks have had time to cover situations, what they want players to see and how they want them to respond when the defense gives them something different, which sounds more useful at this point than simply putting another formation into the playbook.

Mehringer’s description of the offense’s progress made the same point. Earlier in camp, a receiver might have been thinking mostly about whether he lined up correctly and ran the corner route he was assigned. Now the standard has moved considerably beyond that.

“You start to see guys start to get comfortable in what they’re being asked to do,” Mehringer said. “You start to see the fundamentals and details of, it’s not just that they’re going in the right way, right? They’ve got great hand placement. They’ve got great footwork, right? There’s great communication on, you know, when the defense changes or blitzes or whatever it is, right, what communication has to go on. So it’s more than just lining up out there and saying, ‘Hey, I got a corner route.’”

That is a pretty big difference from where an offense usually starts in August. Knowing what you are supposed to do is one level; understanding enough of the whole picture to know what changes when the defense moves is something else entirely.

It also sounds a lot like what Mehringer was telling us earlier in camp about using players rather than sheer play volume to create multiplicity. Dierre Hill Jr. was one example then because Oregon can put a player with his skill set in different places and change the way a defense has to account for him without necessarily installing a completely different offense.

Stewart may now be another example.

Stewart is playing more positions than he did in 2024

Mehringer was asked what Stewart had done to earn his role back after missing last season, and the answer went much further than saying he got healthy. Mehringer said Stewart’s talent was never really in question, but the year away created an opportunity to change some things that needed to change.

“When Evan was coming back in January, I remember talking to him, and I was like, ‘Hey, this is what’s going to happen moving forward for you. And this is the stuff that you’ve got to get better at,’” Mehringer said. “And let’s look at this from just the year of 2026, and let’s look at this as it pertains to your football career moving forward after that. Here’s all the areas you’ve got to grow and improve.”

Mehringer then said Stewart changed “almost all of his work habits” and has had an “unbelievable camp,” but the part I found most interesting came at the end of the answer.

“He’s worked his tail off,” Mehringer said. “He’s playing a number of different positions for us right now, more than he did for us in 2024. So I’m really excited about the season that he’s going to have for us and very proud of him for the way that he’s worked.”

That last part feels important.

Oregon already knew Stewart could run routes and make difficult catches. If he can now move around the formation more than he did the last time he played, Mehringer has another way to change the picture for a defense without changing personnel or reaching deeper into the idea board.

That also helps explain why Mehringer’s comments about complexity sound different now than they did when camp began. More offensive knowledge in the players can create more possibilities without requiring more calls.

Trust may be the actual separator in some of these competitions

Mehringer gave us one of the better answers of the day when he was asked how freshman Messiah Hampton can separate himself in a receiver room this deep. He did not talk about a particular route, speed or some big play Hampton has made in practice.

“I think for anybody at any position, Messiah included, the separation factor is just simply what you do on the field,” Mehringer said. “For a lot of people, it’s the other 10 guys on the field trust you. You’re going to be in there. You’re going to make plays. And Messiah has come along. He’s had a really great last week, and I think he’s doing some really, really good things for us.”

Then Mehringer gave an answer that probably applies to considerably more than Hampton.

“I tell everybody the answer to every single question that you’ll ever have in football is play well,” he said. “Coach, how do I get drafted? It’s play well. How do I get playing time? Play well. It’s all the same.”

The trust part is what stayed with me because Poncho came back to almost the same idea later when talking about freshmen on the offensive line.

Poncho remembered being in their position four years ago, with older players standing between him and the field, and said he tells the younger linemen that the opportunity being available does not mean anyone is going to give it to them.

“I kind of told them, though I had older guys in front of me, I wanted the spot and I wanted to play,” Poncho said. “I didn’t want to be on the sidelines. And I wanted to make sure that I had the trust from the coaches and Coach Lanning and everybody that was here and let them know that they can trust me. When I go out there, I’m going to do my job.”

Poncho continued by bringing it back to all of the work they have already done.

“We’ve been preparing this whole year through winter workouts to spring ball, then to summer and then into fall camp,” he said. “We shouldn’t have any fear about anything. Just trust your technique and fundamentals and just trust the guys beside you.”

Those answers fit together almost too well.

The depth chart most of us want to see is a list of names. The one Oregon is building may have more to do with which player can enter a game without the other 10 guys wondering whether he is going to recognize the same pressure, make the same adjustment or understand why the call changes when the defense moves.

That becomes even more important as opponent preparation begins.

Monday looked like the response Lanning wanted after Scrimmage Two

Lanning said Saturday that the defense got the better of the offense, and Mehringer did not spend any time trying to explain away the result. His answer about Monday was pretty straightforward.

“I think our theme after that was reset, refocus, and those guys did that, I thought,” Mehringer said. “I thought we had a much better day today. The execution and detail and all the things that you’re looking for were a lot higher.”

Stewart was even less diplomatic about which side has been winning lately.

“A whole lot of back and forth competing, for sure,” Stewart said. “Some days, I ain’t going to lie, early on, offense was winning. But lately, defense has been whooping us, I ain’t lying. But it’s been good competition. It’s been evened out. And it’s always nice knowing that you have a good offense and a good defense because we can play off each other. And then when you tag in special teams, it’s like, yeah, got a pretty good team.”

I would not read too much into whether the offense or defense has accumulated more wins during camp. Oregon’s defensive front has been one of the most consistently praised groups on the roster, and the whole point of Lanning wanting practice to be harder than the game is for that group to expose problems before an opponent does.

Poncho certainly sounds as if he sees it that way.

“It feels amazing. It feels great,” Poncho said when asked about finally getting closer to preparing for another team. “I’m thankful and grateful, like I said, to go up against guys like that every single day. It kind of prepares me so I know, like, go through practice right now, so when game time comes, I’m ready to prepare because I already went through this type of look.”

He then went through some of the players the offensive line sees every day, including Bear Alexander, A’Mauri Washington, Matthew Johnson and Tank Jones, before coming back to how much he values those daily battles.

“Just going against them every single day, you know, in the trenches, battling head to head is amazing,” Poncho said. “So I’m just thankful that I get to go against the guys every single day.”

The part we will not know until the season begins is whether all of that difficulty actually transfers. Monday was encouraging because Mehringer thought the details improved immediately after a scrimmage in which Oregon did not finish enough drives, but the proof eventually has to show up against someone wearing a different uniform.

Stewart sounds much further along than simply being healthy again

There was a point in the spring when most of the Stewart conversation was about the green jersey and whether he would be ready to handle everything once Oregon turned the contact back on. He does not sound like a player who is thinking much about that anymore.

Stewart admitted that the opener is starting to affect his sleep a little bit.

“I’m a little bit jittery right now,” Stewart said. “Just late-night sleeps, just thinking about it, waking up, just hoping the day gets closer. I mean, yeah, just counting the days down. Just a blessing to be here, honestly.”

When he was asked about going from spring to fall camp and proving he could handle the work again, Stewart pointed to the obvious change.

“In the spring, it was more like they had me in a green jersey. Everybody was saying he’s in a different jersey, but now they took the green jersey off, and this fall camp has been very action-packed for me, for sure,” Stewart said. “So, yeah, just taking on a bigger role and really filling in those shoes, it’s been elite.”

The time away does not seem to occupy much space in his head anymore either. Stewart said that once he got back on the field in spring it felt like he had never really left, and the accumulation of practices against good competition has brought back most of the comfort he needed.

Mehringer sees the comeback a little differently because he has watched what Stewart changed away from the actual routes. He talked about Stewart’s confidence, but also made a distinction between confidence and arrogance that probably says more about where Stewart is now than any camp stat could.

“Evan does not lack confidence at all,” Mehringer said. “I feel like Evan walks around with that all the time. Evan’s grown so much in the sense that his cockiness doesn’t turn into arrogance at all, and his ability to go do it, but he wants to be coached and he wants to get better and he wants to develop. He doesn’t want to walk off the practice field and nobody said anything to him about how he can improve his performance.”

Mehringer also described a player who rarely has a bad day emotionally.

“He’s got a big smile on his face. He dances,” Mehringer said. “He’s a stud. I love being around Evan.”

That personality came through when Stewart explained why he approaches football with so much joy. He said the game is hard enough that he does not see any reason to make it heavier than it already is, and he likes being the player somebody else can look at during a difficult day and remember to relax a little.

Poncho added another layer that I do not think we had heard before Monday.

He said Stewart has become one of the voices of the offense.

“I’ve seen Evan in the treatment room. I’ve seen Evan with the young guys, just coaching them up on the field, off the field,” Poncho said. “And just seeing him grow in that role, because usually Evan, everybody knows Evan usually is the guy. So for him to sit out this past year kind of really taught him and I think kind of humbled him in a way.”

Poncho then pointed to the change he can actually hear at practice.

“Now I can hear Evan’s voice out at the field where it’s no longer just me and Dante,” Poncho said. “Everybody knows Evan is that guy. And when Evan speaks, it has a lot of volume behind it.”

That may be one of the better Stewart developments from the entire interview.

Oregon is not simply getting the receiver it lost after 2024. The Ducks may be getting a more versatile receiver, a better practice player and someone who now carries enough experience in the room that younger players are listening when he says something.

Stewart’s connection with Dante Moore is probably beyond the chemistry stage

We have heard about Stewart and Moore working together throughout the offseason, but Stewart gave his strongest description yet of where the relationship stands.

“I would say we’ve been hot, for sure,” Stewart said. “I was talking about him the other day with my pops. I actually don’t think I’ve had this type of connection with a quarterback in a minute, dating back to high school, honestly. He throws a very nice ball. He knows what’s going on. He’s very elusive. He’s a gamer, so it’s fun to play with a guy like him for sure.”

Stewart finished the answer with something that probably captures his excitement better than anything else he said Monday.

“This fall camp has really showed me what I was missing out on last year,” Stewart said. “So I can’t wait.”

That is considerably more than two players saying they have good chemistry.

Mehringer has already said Moore’s football knowledge is among the best he has been around, while leadership has been one of the biggest areas of growth for the quarterback. A’lique Terry has talked previously about Moore and Poncho understanding enough of the offense to have conversations that go well beyond their own assignments, which gives Oregon two experienced players in the middle of the operation while the line around them is still being sorted.

Now add a healthy Stewart who is lining up in more places and believes he has one of the better quarterback connections of his career. We will see how it looks once a defense starts game-planning specifically to take him away, but the foundation sounds considerably further along than it did even in spring.

The offensive line is still being sorted, but the cross-training has not stopped

Lanning said Saturday that some offensive linemen have begun separating themselves through consistency, but Poncho did not make it sound like Oregon has simply settled on five and closed the competition. He said the group is still “trying to figure out who’s going to be on that field,” and the standard he keeps coming back to is the one established by the linemen who came before this group.

Poncho mentioned Jackson Powers-Johnson, Steven Jones and Josh Conerly Jr. as players he learned from, and his description of the standard was not complicated.

“It’s a big standard,” Poncho said. “You want to make sure that we’re protecting the guys at all costs and just making sure that we set the law firm, you know, that’s what we are. So we want to make sure we set things straight.”

What I found more revealing was how much movement is still happening behind the obvious competition.

Poncho said Tommy Tofi has played all four offensive-line positions other than center. At center, Oregon has been working Bryce Boulton, Devin Brooks and Koloi Keli, while some of the guards are also getting work there as Oregon tries to make sure the best five eventually get onto the field.

“Just seeing those guys battle every single day, because at the end of the day, we want to make sure the best five is out there,” Poncho said. “And right now, I’d probably say we got probably one of the best O-line groups I’ve been around where a bunch of guys can step up and play at any time. So that’s what I’m very excited to see.”

That is a pretty strong endorsement from somebody who has been part of several good offensive lines at Oregon.

I still think the cohesion question matters because A’lique Terry has been talking about finding the right mesh and eventually “gluing” combinations together since the first half of camp. But Poncho’s answer sounds much more like Oregon is sorting through useful options than searching for enough capable linemen to survive.

Poncho is becoming part coach for a reason

Mehringer called Poncho “the rock, the apex” of the offensive line earlier in camp, and Monday gave us more context for what that actually looks like within the room.

Poncho was asked whether he feels almost as much like a coach as a player at this point, and he did not shy away from the responsibility.

“I’m just grateful and thankful for that opportunity, really, because I was once in their shoes before,” Poncho said. “So being able to lead and help those guys out in terms of whatever it is, whether we’re off the field or on the field, just helping them out in life and in the game means a lot. And I’m very big on pouring back into the youth and into the younger guys, so I want to make sure I can lead like that and lead by example and just having that servant leadership mindset.”

That showed up several times in the interview.

Poncho talked about Tommy Tofi and Manny Iheanacho constantly asking questions instead of sitting quietly in the back of the room. Tommy has had more time in the program and Poncho sees a significant difference from when he arrived, while Manny’s ability to answer questions after arriving during the summer has stood out because of how quickly he has absorbed the offense.

Michael Bennett III is approaching the process similarly.

“He got the brains. He picked up things kind of quick, I’m not going to lie,” Poncho said. “Just seeing the way he comes in, attacking every single day and the questions he has, like after probably every rep or whatever, he’ll come up and ask me a question. And I like that because that means he’s into it. He wants to learn. He wants to understand our scheme better.”

That seems to be the common thread in this offensive-line competition. The physical ability gets a player into the conversation, but the people earning trust are the ones moving beyond memorizing their own job and beginning to understand what the rest of the line is doing.

Poncho is in a pretty good position to teach that because he already had to learn it himself.

The receiver room may be even deeper than the names we have been talking about

Most of the receiver conversation has centered on Stewart, Jeremiah McClellan, Dakorien Moore, the other established rotation players and Gatlin Bair. Monday gave us another name worth keeping in the notebook with both Mehringer and Stewart talking about Messiah Hampton.

Mehringer said Hampton has had a really good week, while Stewart said he saw signs as far back as winter workouts and spring that Hampton had a chance to help.

“He’s maturing a lot,” Stewart said. “I already knew he was kind of going to be a good player for us in the spring, coming early in winter workouts. Him and Hudson Lewis, they’re like a dynamic duo. They work together. They’re workhorses for sure. And Messiah just came in and put down his head and worked every single day.”

Stewart also offered a useful explanation for why Bair appears to be catching up after so much time away from football.

“Gatlin’s very smart,” Stewart said. “That’s one thing that definitely helped him out whenever getting back and knocking the rust off because, I mean, the physicality for Gatlin, it was always going to be there. So the mental that Gatlin got has definitely helped him, and he’s definitely stepping up and making plays.”

Mehringer’s answer about the entire room also sounded a lot like Ross Douglas did last week. He likes the talent, but he was much more interested in making sure nobody reduces the position to running routes and catching passes.

“Ross coaches them hard too,” Mehringer said. “They’re not just pretty boys out there. They’ve got to be tough and play tough. They’ve got to block in the run game and do all the stuff necessary for us to be able to win games in a variety of fashions.”

Mehringer has no problem acknowledging what the group can do with the football either.

“I do think any of them can go change the game,” he said. “And to be honest with you, that’s been our expectation of them. Like when you’re out on the field, you’re supposed to do this because you’re good enough to do it. So we’re going to hold you to that standard.”

That probably gets closer to what Douglas meant when he said Oregon does not necessarily need a traditional No. 1 receiver. It is not about avoiding a hierarchy because everybody needs to feel good; it is about having enough complete players that the offense can take the answer the defense gives it.

Tight end may be one place where patience is still required

Mehringer also gave us a useful explanation for why the tight end picture may take longer to sort out than some other positions. He said tight ends develop a little more slowly because, other than throwing the football, they are asked to do almost everything else in Oregon’s offense.

“There’s a lot of skill and a lot of knowledge you’ve got to acquire,” Mehringer said. “All three of those kids have done a really, really good job. Really, not even three, but there’s a bunch of them now, five or six. But they’ve done a really good job. I think it’s a really good room that will continue to develop and get better.”

That is also probably worth remembering when we start judging freshman roles in a couple of weeks.

Mehringer still believes “if you’re good enough, you’re old enough,” but he also acknowledged Monday that freshmen rarely arrive as finished products. They go from being one of the best players in high school to suddenly being surrounded by players who were every bit as accomplished, while also carrying far more scheme than they ever had before.

Oregon’s depth gives the staff some room to let that process happen rather than forcing young players into roles simply because they were highly recruited.

What I think we actually learned Monday

I expected Monday to be mostly about how the offense responded to Scrimmage Two and whether the offensive-line competition had finally started producing a clear five. We got some information on both, but I think the better story was underneath those answers.

Mehringer still has plenty of ideas. What has changed is the question he is asking about them. Oregon does not seem particularly interested in adding something simply because it can; the staff wants to know whether the idea is necessary and whether the players can execute it without sacrificing the detail they have spent August building.

Stewart fits directly into that because he is playing more positions than he did in 2024. Tommy Tofi fits it because he can work at four offensive-line spots. Poncho is helping younger linemen understand enough of the offense to earn the trust of the people beside them, while Mehringer’s answer about Messiah Hampton suggested that the real separator is whether the other 10 players believe you will do your job when the picture changes.

That is where I think Monday gave us something we had not quite heard this clearly before.

Oregon may enter the season with a lot of offense available to it, but Mehringer does not sound interested in winning by having the thickest playbook in the conference. He sounds much more interested in having players who understand the offense well enough that the same personnel can create different problems from one snap to the next.

If that works, Oregon can look complicated to the defense without feeling complicated to itself.

And that is probably a much more dangerous kind of complexity.

There is a downside to all of the talk about Oregon’s depth that we probably have not spent enough time discussing. When you have this many good players competing for a limited number of roles, eventually somebody who is good enough to play is still going to lose something.

That might be a starting job, a target, a place in the first five or the No. 2 quarterback job. It might be something much smaller, like being the third receiver into the game instead of the second, but those things matter to players who have spent most of their lives being one of the best players on every team they have played for.

For most of August, Oregon has been able to talk about all of this as a positive because it is a positive. There are more players who can help than there are obvious holes on the roster, and that is a much better problem than trying to figure out whether you have enough good players to get through the season.

The first scrimmage started to change that conversation when Dan Lanning talked about players being accountable and capable. If you do your job and prove that you are capable of doing what Oregon asks, you keep getting opportunities; if you do not, those opportunities start to disappear.

The second scrimmage pushed things a little farther down that road. I think we are getting pretty close to the point where the staff knows who is seriously in the mix at most positions, and the next question is how many of those players actually get enough work to become part of the plan for the opener.

That is where I think this week gets really interesting.

Read more

Oregon spent most of August finding out how many players could help. The second scrimmage gave us a better idea of where some of those competitions are headed.

Today on the DSC Inside Read, a look at the state of where Oregon stands following their second scrimmage of fall camp.

THREE OBSERVATIONS:

3. I liked where the defensive improvement showed up

I do not know that there is much value in simply saying the defense "won" the second scrimmage. One side has to come out looking better in a closed practice. Without seeing the film, it is hard to know whether that means the defense was dominant, the offense had a bad day, or a handful of plays tilted the whole thing one direction.

What I did find interesting was Dan Lanning's point about where the defense had success. He specifically mentioned third-down stops, red-zone stops, and takeaways, all of which have been part of the discussion around this defense since camp started.

Chris Hampton has talked quite a bit about finishing. Oregon was able to create pressure last season, but too often the quarterback got away, or a disruptive play still left the offense on schedule. The red zone was also an area Hampton made pretty clear had to get better, so hearing that the defense was getting off the field on third down and making stops once the offense got close to the goal line caught my attention more than hearing which side won the scrimmage.

I can't say Oregon has fixed anything yet. Lanning also said, "I think we still got to get better against the run based on what I saw today." Given the expectations surrounding this defensive front, I wouldn't gloss over it just because the rest of the report was positive.

Still, if you are looking for progress from the first part of camp, I think this is probably one of the better places to find it. The Ducks have talked about finishing defensive plays and drives for most of August, and on Saturday, they seemed to do a better job of both.

2. Special teams looked a lot more comfortable Saturday

I thought special teams was one of the areas worth watching closely coming out of the first scrimmage because there was enough inconsistency there to wonder how quickly everything would settle. Saturday sounded much more like what Oregon probably expected when camp began.

Rocco Graziano went 4-for-4, Gage Hurych also kicked well, there were three attempts from beyond 50 yards, and Lanning said the punt locations were better. Oregon also did not repeat the kickoff mistake from the first scrimmage, and overall there was just a much cleaner tone to the way Lanning talked about the group.

"I don't think it's anything that these guys are doing different," Lanning said. "Maybe it's a level of focus when they're out there."

I actually think that answer makes sense when you look at the way Joe Lorig has talked about developing these specialists. Oregon did not wait until Atticus Sappington left before starting to prepare Hurych for the job. Lorig has talked about creating pressure situations for him in practice and getting him actual game work so that his first meaningful kick would not also be his first meaningful experience.

Bailey Ettridge is a little different, but there was a plan there too. Oregon liked his Australian football background, his age and the variety he can bring to the punting game, especially after James Ferguson-Reynolds gave them so many different ways to change field position.

None of that means the Ducks suddenly have these jobs completely figured out, and I would not go that far after one clean scrimmage. But I also do not think replacing two proven specialists looks quite as uncertain as it did a few weeks ago, especially if the operation continues to look like it did Saturday.

1. I am starting to think we have been asking the wrong question about Evan Stewart

We have probably reached the point where there is not much reason to keep asking whether Stewart is having a good camp. Enough people have said it, Lanning has continued to say it, and Stewart added another big play during the game-on-the-line period Saturday.

I think the better question now is what Oregon wants the receiver room to look like around him. Ross Douglas gave a pretty interesting answer Friday when he said he does not necessarily think the Ducks need a traditional No. 1 receiver. The more I thought about that over the weekend, the more I liked what he was getting at.

That does not mean Stewart cannot be the best receiver on the team. I would not be surprised if he leads Oregon in catches and yards, and there may be games where Dante Moore looks his direction over and over because the matchup is there.

But I do not think Oregon wants to enter a game, ahead oftime, deciding that Stewart needs 8 or 10 catches to justify his role. If the defense is giving Jeremiah McClellan a matchup, or De'Corian Moore is getting space, or one of the tight ends is creating a problem inside, then the offense should be good enough to take what is there.

Douglas has also spent a lot of time talking about everything receivers do when they are not getting the ball. Blocking matters, route detail matters, and being able to line up in more than one place matters, especially in an offense that wants to move people around without changing personnel every time it changes the picture.

That may be the most important part of this receiver depth. Oregon can have Stewart playing like a No. 1 without having to structure the whole offense around proving that he is one. I think that makes the group more difficult to defend if everybody is willing to live with the ball moving around.

TWO QUESTIONS:

2. When does the offensive line stop experimenting and start settling in?

I still think the offensive line is the biggest question on this team, though it is not the same question we were asking when camp started. Back then, there was some concern about whether Oregon really had enough players ready to replace three starters without going into the portal for a major rebuild.

I am not really worried about whether they can find five players anymore. Lanning sounds like the staff already has a pretty good idea who the realistic group is, and Saturday he said some players have "made it more clear with the way that they compete and their consistency."

The part that is still unresolved is how those players fit together. A'lique Terry has used the word "cohesion" several times, talked about finding the right pairs, and said that they would eventually start "gluing" the group together once people separated themselves.

That is where I think we are now. Having six, seven, or eight offensive linemen capable of playing is a good problem, and over the course of a long season Oregon is probably going to need most of them at some point.

But offensive line is also different from almost every other position because it is so dependent on the guy next to you. A tackle can play well individually, and the protection can still break down if he and the guard are not seeing the same thing. The same is true inside when the center is making calls, and everybody has to react almost immediately.

I think Terry has had the luxury of moving people around because Oregon wanted to find out how much depth it really had. Once the opponent work begins, I would expect that to start changing because the best five or six need enough repetitions together for some of those decisions to become automatic.

There is still time to do that, but we are also getting close enough to the season that I would like to hear the conversation move from who can play to who is playing together.

1. Is the run defense actually something to worry about?

Right now, I say no, but I've noted Lanning's comment for future reference. He was complimentary of the defense as a whole and then still made a point of saying they need to get better against the run based on what he saw in the scrimmage.

We have no idea what that looked like. There are no rushing totals, no film, and no way to know whether he was talking about a couple of bad fits or something that showed up throughout the practice.

That makes it almost impossible to turn into a real concern right now. I would rather wait and see if it comes up again during the week before putting much weight behind it.

The reason I am watching it at all is that the defensive front has been one of the most consistently praised groups on the roster. Oregon has a lot of size, a lot of experience, and enough depth to rotate players without immediately giving away much in terms of talent.

If that group is going to be as good as everyone thinks it can be, it needs to control the run and create problems in the passing game. One comment after one scrimmage is not enough to change how I feel about the group, but if Lanning or Hampton is still talking about run fits later this week. I think it becomes a little more notable.

For now, I would file it under something to watch rather than something to worry about. There is a pretty big difference between the two this time of year.

ONE PREDICTION:

1. By the end of this week, most of the important depth-chart decisions will probably be made even if Oregon never tells us what they are

Lanning said the Ducks will start preparing for opponents later this week. However, he also made it clear they are still primarily focused on Oregon right now. The transition is when many of the competitions we have been discussing all month will quietly become much less open.

The backup quarterback is a good example. Oregon could spread repetitions around early in camp because Dylan Raiola, Brock Thomas, and Akili Smith Jr. all needed work. Still, once the staff is preparing an actual game plan, somebody has to get enough snaps to be ready if Moore has to leave the field.

The same thing applies on the offensive line. If Terry is still rotating everybody equally deep into game week, I would be more concerned than I am now because the likely starters need work together, even if Oregon plans to use six or seven linemen over the course of a game.

Receiver and defensive rotations will probably become a little clearer for the same reason. It is one thing to say a player deserves to be in the mix during fall camp. It is another thing to decide that he is the guy you want on the field on third-and-8 when the opponent gives you a particular look.

I do not expect Lanning to walk into a press conference and give everybody a clean two-deep. That has never really been how Oregon operates, and there is no reason to help an opponent by making those decisions public before they need to be.

We will start hearing the decisions in the way coaches talk. Players who were "competing" a week ago will start being described as consistent, dependable, or ready for a specific role. Some of the competitions that generated long answers earlier in camp will probably start getting much shorter ones.

Oregon spent most of August trying to figure out how many players could help this team. By the end of this week, I think the staff will have a much better idea of which ones it plans to trust when the games actually count.

As I get ready to head home early this morning from one of the better vacations I have taken in a while, I find myself carrying two emotions that should probably conflict more than they do. I loved nearly every minute of this trip, yet I am also ready to go home.

The first three days were filled with baseball and fun, followed by three more with my granddaughter as we celebrated her first birthday. For those of you who followed her journey last year, you know this was never a milestone our family could simply assume would arrive. Seeing her smile, hearing her laugh and watching the absolute joy with which she seems to approach her little world felt like a blessing I cannot adequately describe.

There is something strange about moments like those. You understand, perhaps more clearly than you normally allow yourself to, that the moment is disappearing even while you are living inside it. A first birthday eventually becomes a second, the little girl laughing in front of you becomes someone older, and someday the pictures will become evidence of a time you would gladly step back into for just a few minutes.

And yet, even surrounded by all that joy, I missed home. I found myself thinking about long walks with Fiji, the familiar routines that sometimes become almost invisible because I see them every day, and the excitement that comes with football season finally arriving. There was no desire to leave the trip early or somehow exchange what I had experienced for something else. I was simply beginning to feel the pull of the place to which I belong.

Robert Louis Stevenson captured something of that feeling in Requiem:

“Home is the sailor, home from sea,
And the hunter home from the hill.”

I have always liked those lines because the idea of home becomes more meaningful after the sea and after the hill. The journey does not diminish the destination. In some ways, it teaches us what the destination means.

I found myself thinking about that this week because so much of what Oregon football has been telling us lately

Read more

 The defense answered the offense with third-down and red-zone stops, special teams produced its cleanest scrimmage yet, Evan Stewart delivered in the final period and Oregon emerged relatively healthy from what Dan Lanning expects to be its last major live-tackling session before the season. The offensive line remains unsettled, but Lanning made clear that practicing against Oregon’s defensive front is supposed to make the eventual games feel easier.

Oregon entered its second fall scrimmage with a growing list of questions, but Dan Lanning’s immediate assessment Saturday started with something much simpler. The Ducks competed, tackled live for what will probably be the final extended period before the opener and emerged relatively healthy, which allowed Oregon to accomplish something it increasingly has to balance as the season gets closer: create enough real football to produce honest evaluation without unnecessarily spending bodies in August.

“Good scrimmage today, some good work,” Lanning said. “It’ll be the last time that we really get a lot of live tackling in practice before we get to a game. Ultimately, guys came out relatively healthy.”

There was another part of Lanning’s opening that deserves attention because it connects the physicality of the day to a theme Oregon has been talking about since Media Day. He said there were “some really good examples of protecting their teammates and not taking shots that were unnecessary,” which is a different kind of physical maturity than simply proving who can hit hardest.

At Media Day, Lanning said Oregon’s identity would not be reinvented by some dramatic schematic change. He wanted fall camp to solidify what has already won games for the Ducks, specifically the ability to block, tackle and execute at a high level while maximizing fundamentals, technique and effort. Saturday gave Oregon one final extended opportunity to evaluate those fundamentals through real tackling, but it also tested whether the connection Lanning has spent months emphasizing could survive the violence of an actual scrimmage without players losing sight of the fact that the opponent across from them was still a teammate.

The result was not simply another collection of August repetitions. Scrimmage Two produced a different winner than Scrimmage One and, in several areas, a much clearer picture of what Oregon corrected during the week.

The defense flipped the result, and the reason was finish

Lanning was unusually direct about which side won Saturday.

“I’d say last scrimmage, I’d say the offense got the better of the defense,” he said. “I’d say today the defense got the better of the offense.”

That does not mean Oregon’s offense spent the afternoon going nowhere. Lanning said the offense “had some good drives” and was able to create rhythm, but the next part of his assessment is where the scrimmage becomes much more significant.

The offense did not finish those opportunities.

“We had some good drives, put together some rhythm, but didn’t capitalize, able to finish on those drives,” Lanning said, before noting that the defense also created takeaways.

That immediately returns Oregon to one of the most persistent themes we heard before camp ever started. At Media Day, Ify Obidegwu was asked what the defense could take from last season’s disappointing finish, and he kept returning to the same word. “Really just, I’ll probably just say just finish, like finishing,” Obidegwu said, specifically pointing toward fourth-quarter performance and red-zone defense as areas Oregon needed to improve.

Chris Hampton carried that language into the opening week of camp. His defensive standard was never simply about installing more calls or creating more pressure. Oregon had to convert disruption into finished plays and become significantly better in the red zone, with Hampton repeatedly emphasizing that the Ducks needed to “sack the quarterback and finish.”

Saturday provided actual evidence in precisely those situations.

Asked what allowed the defense to control the second scrimmage, Lanning immediately identified “third down stops, red area stops.” He also thought the defense continued attacking the football well, saying there were balls Oregon was able to get out and noting that the same emphasis had shown up in the first scrimmage.

That is meaningful because the defense did not simply win more isolated plays Saturday. It apparently won the plays that end possessions.

Third down gets the offense off the field. Red-zone stops keep points off the scoreboard. Takeaways end drives immediately. Those are the situations that turn defensive talent into winning defense, and they are also the areas Oregon spent the offseason identifying as places where last year’s performance had to improve.

Lanning was not ready to call the defensive day complete, however, because he thought the run defense still left something on the film.

“I think we still got to get better against the run based on what I saw today,” he said, while repeatedly qualifying all of his initial observations with the reminder that the staff still needed to watch the tape.

That is an important distinction. Oregon’s defense may have won Scrimmage Two, but Lanning did not describe the result as arrival. The defense got stops, attacked the football and won the day while still leaving another obvious correction for the next week of practice.

Oregon’s offensive line picture is narrowing without becoming settled

The offensive line remains the position where people most want Lanning to provide a definitive answer, and Saturday did not produce one.

There has been movement. Lanning acknowledged that “there’s some that have made it more clear with the way that they compete and their consistency,” but he also said other players are still trying to establish what the best version of themselves looks like.

“I don’t think there’s any clear decisions, especially without watching the film, on these are the first five or these are the guys that are going to be able to rotate in,” Lanning said. “We still got to watch that film and assess it. Plenty of time to figure that out.”

The distinction becomes important when comparing that answer to what Lanning said at Media Day. He was already envisioning the possibility of six, seven or even eight offensive linemen rotating during the season, with individual roles growing according to how players performed once they received them. That was never presented as evidence that Oregon could not find five players. Lanning said the staff had enough confidence in the talent already in the room that it did not feel compelled to reach into the portal simply to manufacture answers.

Fox Crader described the eventual standard even more simply at Media Day. “The best five are going to play,” he said, adding that the linemen understood they had to put egos aside and allow practice to determine the outcome. Crader also said, “I believe everybody we need is in the room right now,” while pointing toward younger players pushing the veterans every day.

Saturday suggests Oregon is now somewhere between those two ideas.

Lanning said the staff already has “a clear picture” of which linemen are realistically in the competition. What remains unresolved is how sharply that group separates and whether Oregon ultimately settles on five primary players or enters the season comfortable rotating more.

“When it becomes more defined and when it’s very clear, it’s when it makes it easy,” Lanning said. “But I wouldn’t say it’s to that point yet.”

That is not the same thing as saying Oregon has no idea what it has. The pool has narrowed, but the hierarchy has not completely separated.

Oregon’s defensive front is making the offensive-line evaluation harder in exactly the way Lanning wants

One of the most useful answers of the entire interview came when Lanning was asked whether practicing against Oregon’s experienced defensive front makes it difficult to evaluate younger offensive linemen.

His answer was essentially the opposite.

“I think it makes it clear what the standard is,” Lanning said.

That sentence connects almost perfectly to what Oregon’s offensive linemen were saying at Media Day. Crader talked about practicing every day against what he believes is one of the best defensive fronts in the country and said Oregon constantly repeats the idea that “practice is going to be harder than the game.”

Lanning used almost identical language Saturday.

“It doesn’t matter who lines up against us,” he said. “We’re going to go against some really good D-lines this year. And we want it to be harder in practice than it is in the game. So if that’s a challenge, that’s a positive.”

That does not mean every lost offensive-line rep can be dismissed because Oregon’s defensive front is good. If the same protection problems continue appearing once the season begins, nobody will care that they were exposed first by Matayo Uiagalelei, A’Mauri Washington, Bear Alexander or the rest of Oregon’s front.

What the competition does provide is a much more demanding evaluation environment.

An offensive lineman who demonstrates he can consistently function against Oregon’s defensive front gives Terry considerably more meaningful evidence than someone succeeding in protected drills against inferior competition. Lanning also turned the standard back onto the defensive line, saying there is an expectation for what that group “should look like play in and play out if they are what they say they are.”

That is the useful tension inside Oregon’s line-of-scrimmage battle. The offense cannot use the quality of the defense as an excuse, while the defense cannot use its reputation as proof. Both sides have to keep earning the evaluation.

The special teams response was tangible

If the offensive-line picture remained complicated, special teams produced one of the cleanest answers of the day.

“The kicking game was much better today,” Lanning said.

Rocco Graziano went 4-for-4, Gage Hurych also performed well and Oregon had better punt locations. Lanning later added that the Ducks attempted three kicks from beyond 50 yards and did not repeat the kickoff out of bounds that appeared during the first scrimmage.

That response is important because special teams was one of the areas Lanning immediately identified for correction after Scrimmage One. The Ducks did not need a philosophical adjustment during the week. According to Lanning, the improvement may have been considerably simpler.

“I don’t think it’s anything that these guys are doing different,” he said. “Maybe it’s a level of focus when they’re out there.”

That fits the way Oregon has prepared Hurych for this opportunity. At Media Day, he pushed back against the idea that he lacked meaningful experience, saying, “Experience is something that people say I lack, but I got a lot of it last year.” He also explained that one of the biggest parts of his preparation is deliberately putting himself into “game mode in practice” so the transition feels more familiar when the situation becomes real.

Joe Lorig later revealed how intentional that preparation has been. Oregon has spent years manufacturing pressure situations and finding real-game repetitions for Hurych because the staff did not want his first important kick to arrive only after Atticus Sappington was gone.

Scrimmage One created some inconsistency. Scrimmage Two provided a better response, including long attempts and a more game-like operation. That is exactly what August is supposed to do.

Koi Perich is beginning to sound like part of the defensive leadership structure

Lanning also offered one of his strongest evaluations yet of Koi Perich, and what stood out was not simply the physical play.

“I really heard his voice out there today,” Lanning said. “He’s been physical since the day he got here.”

Perich has improved in several areas since arriving, but Lanning said Saturday was one of the first days where he particularly felt the transfer’s presence, both through communication and the way he finished plays.

That is worth connecting to Oregon’s larger leadership conversation because Lanning has spent the entire month searching for more players capable of carrying the standard onto the field. After Practice 1, he challenged veterans who survived the opening workout by asking, “Who’d you bring with you?” and said Oregon needed to create more alphas during camp.

Perich’s evaluation Saturday sounded like another example of that standard becoming football rather than terminology.

Communication from the secondary affects everyone. A safety who understands what is coming, gets people aligned and communicates quickly can solve problems before the snap that never appear in a box score.

Lanning still stopped short of declaring the evaluation complete.

“I’m still going to watch the film,” he said. “I’m sure there’s some things for him to clean up, but he’s been a really pleasant surprise for us.”

That combination of praise and correction has been Lanning’s default setting throughout camp. Good performance earns more responsibility, not exemption from evaluation.

Jerry Mixon and Devon Jackson give Oregon multiple answers at linebacker

Lanning was similarly positive about Jerry Mixon and Devon Jackson at inside linebacker, though his most important point concerned the room rather than either individual.

“They’ve done a good job,” he said. “I think that’s one of those positions where we have multiple guys that are playing above-the-line football there that can help us, and those two included.”

That phrase, above-the-line football, has been one of the most important clues in understanding how Oregon views depth. The objective is not simply to identify starters and backups. The staff wants to know how many players can enter a game without forcing the standard to change.

That matters particularly at linebacker because communication has been a recurring theme all week. Brian Michalowski described Mixon as a player whose knowledge and voice could connect the entire defense, while Mixon talked about the need to “flip the switch” between his quieter personality away from football and the communication required once he steps onto the field.

Saturday gave Lanning another opportunity to hear whether those voices survive a more game-like setting, and his answer suggests they did.

Evan Stewart’s camp keeps adding evidence

The Evan Stewart conversation has become remarkably consistent.

Lanning said before camp that Stewart had attacked the offseason. Dante Moore used even stronger language at Media Day, saying Stewart had “probably had the greatest offseason I ever seen” because of the early mornings, late nights and the way he pushed both himself and the team. Moore also described a relationship with Stewart that extends back to Texas and praised the leadership Stewart brought throughout the offseason, saying it matters when someone other than the quarterback is comfortable leading the team.

Two scrimmages into fall camp, Lanning’s evaluation has not changed.

“He’s had really good camp,” Lanning said. “He’s played really well.”

Stewart did not receive as many targets Saturday, which actually fits Ross Douglas’ explanation from Practice 13 that Oregon does not necessarily need a permanent No. 1 receiver dominating the football every day. The offense wants enough answers that the defense can dictate where opportunities appear without removing Oregon’s ability to punish the adjustment.

Stewart still found his moment.

“I don’t think he got quite as many targets today, but he came up with a really big play in our game-on-the-line period there at the end,” Lanning said. “He’s done a really good job, and obviously those guys have a unique connection.”

The “those guys” are Stewart and Dante Moore, and that connection has been developing long before Saturday.

At Media Day, Moore called the relationship with Stewart something that had come “full circle” after knowing and throwing with him in Texas years earlier. He also described Stewart’s leadership as visible in team runs, walkthroughs and throughout the offseason rather than something limited to receiving production.

Saturday added another football moment to that relationship. On a day when the defense won most of the larger battle, Moore and Stewart still produced when Oregon deliberately created a game-on-the-line situation.

Practice has to become the game for Stewart and Gatlin Bair

Stewart and Gatlin Bair share an unusual problem despite arriving at it through completely different circumstances.

Neither has played an actual football game in more than a year.

Ross Douglas talked Friday about Bair needing to reacclimate his body to football after two years away, including contact, change of direction and the physical experience of catching through defenders. Stewart’s absence came from injury rather than time away from the sport, but the challenge of recreating game speed remains similar.

Lanning said the solution is to make practice as close to the missing experience as possible.

“Making practice as much as possible like a game, right? Recreating those moments,” he said.

Saturday was intentionally built to do that.

Lanning said Oregon divided into a “combat group” and a “Fighting Ducks group,” creating teams and operating special teams as though the Ducks were actually playing a game. That structure was not just for entertainment or competition. It was designed to make the organizational demands, transitions and pressure resemble Saturday football closely enough that players without recent game experience could begin replacing what they have missed.

“A lot of that operation today was to help create that,” Lanning said. “So those guys have had a lot of snaps in practice, and those have to qualify.”

That phrase captures a large part of Oregon’s developmental philosophy.

Practice repetitions have to qualify as preparation. That is why the caliber of the opponent matters, why live tackling matters in controlled doses and why Oregon deliberately creates game-on-the-line periods rather than treating every August snap as interchangeable.

Trent Ferguson is becoming another offensive-line name worth tracking

One of the more specific individual evaluations Saturday involved local offensive lineman Trent Ferguson.

Lanning’s first memory of Ferguson was unusual.

“Maybe the first film I saw was him playing lacrosse, which is interesting because he’s a huge guy,” Lanning said.

What has kept Ferguson in the conversation is considerably more conventional.

“Trent has an unbelievable work ethic,” Lanning said. “He puts in the time. He spends a lot of effort. And he’s one of those guys that’s been big for a long time and now has really grown into his body. He can move people up front. He’s had a good fall camp.”

Ferguson’s emergence has already been visible inside the offensive-line room. Earlier in camp, A’lique Terry told the story of Dave Iuli coming out of practice talking about how well Ferguson had played, saying, “Man, Trent balling. Trent playing with some power.”

That does not make Ferguson one of the starting five, and Lanning went out of his way Saturday to avoid creating a depth chart before reviewing the film. It does make him part of the reason Oregon can continue talking seriously about more than five playable linemen.

The grading standard did not change for Scrimmage Two

The first scrimmage gave us perhaps the clearest evaluation framework of camp when Lanning said Oregon would judge players by two questions: Are you accountable, and are you capable?

He has not changed it.

Asked whether the final major live-tackling session required a different grading system, Lanning said it would be “graded the same way” as the first scrimmage.

The physical evidence simply becomes harder to manufacture once Oregon stops taking players to the ground.

“We’ll still have some tackling drills and things that we do,” Lanning said. “You have to do that every single day in practice. But as far as tackling guys to the ground, there’s something to be said for who can get guys down, who can break tackles. And in moments like this, I think that shows up a little bit more.”

That makes the film from Saturday particularly valuable.

Oregon can continue teaching tackling technique. It can continue thudding runners, working leverage and practicing pursuit. But there are certain questions that only reveal themselves completely when a defender has to finish a tackle and a ball carrier is genuinely trying to break it.

Scrimmage Two provided one of the last large samples Oregon will get before somebody in a different uniform supplies the answer.

Oregon is getting closer to opponent preparation, but Lanning still wants Oregon studying Oregon

The calendar is beginning to change.

Lanning said Oregon has already completed some preliminary opponent work during the summer and will begin moving deeper into game planning toward the end of next week. Until then, the emphasis remains internal.

“It’s still going to be more about Oregon than anybody else,” Lanning said.

That may be the cleanest way to understand where the Ducks stand following Scrimmage Two.

The defense winning Saturday matters, but not because Oregon needs to declare one side of the football ahead of the other. Special teams improving matters because the operation was more focused. The offensive line remaining unsettled matters because there is still evidence to evaluate before Oregon begins distributing game-week repetitions more narrowly.

Even the individual praise came attached to a larger standard. Perich communicated and finished. Stewart produced late despite fewer targets. Ferguson’s work ethic has translated into a strong camp. Mixon and Jackson are part of a linebacker room with multiple players functioning above the line.

None of those evaluations required Lanning to declare Oregon ready.

That would actually contradict what he told us at Media Day, when he said fall camp was about solidifying an identity rooted in blocking, tackling, execution, fundamentals, technique and effort rather than inventing something entirely new.

Scrimmage Two gave Oregon another measurement against that standard.

The Ducks emerged relatively healthy from their final extended live-tackling work. The defense answered a first scrimmage won by the offense with third-down stops, red-zone stops and takeaways. Special teams improved. The offensive line moved closer to definition without reaching it, while the defensive front continued providing exactly the kind of uncomfortable practice environment Lanning wants.

There are still corrections ahead, particularly Oregon’s run defense and the offense’s inability to finish promising drives Saturday. There is also enough positive evidence that the discussion can now begin shifting from what this roster might contain toward what Oregon is actually preparing to use.

Lanning will watch the film before making any of those decisions final, and that restraint is probably the most appropriate conclusion to a closed August scrimmage.

The picture is clearer, even if it is not finished yet.

Ross Douglas sees a collection of receivers who can hurt defenses in different ways, Jack Smith calls the tight end a “second quarterback,” and Jeremiah McClellan says every day in Oregon’s receiver room feels like a game. Thirteen practices into camp, the Ducks are beginning to reveal a passing-game philosophy built as much around versatility, selflessness and shared responsibility as catches and touchdowns.

For most of fall camp, Oregon’s passing game has been discussed through the names that make it exciting. Evan Stewart is back. Dakorien Moore has another year in the system. Jeremiah McClellan continues ascending. Gatlin Bair possesses rare speed. Jalen Lott has repeatedly forced his way into conversations about Oregon’s young players, while Iverson “Strap” Hooks brought experience into a room already filled with talent. At tight end, Jamari Johnson returned as the established veteran while Andrew Olesh, Marcus Dixon, Kendre Harrison and AJ Pugliano gave Oregon several very different developmental possibilities behind him.

Practice 13 finally gave us a better picture of how Oregon intends to fit those pieces together, and the answer is more interesting than identifying a traditional WR1 or determining which tight end sits second on a depth chart. Douglas repeatedly resisted rigid labels Friday, whether he was asked about a No. 1 receiver, the number of wideouts he wants in his rotation or whether Hooks should be considered a slot receiver. Smith did essentially the same thing from the tight end perspective, describing a position Oregon asks to block, protect, run routes, understand screen timing and process enough of the offense that he views the tight end as something close to a second quarterback.

The underlying idea is familiar because Drew Mehringer introduced it early in camp. Oregon wants enough multiplicity to create answers without building an offense so complicated that execution suffers. Mehringer called complexity a “double-edged sword” after Practice 3 and talked about the balance between giving a defense multiple problems and making sure the players receive enough repetitions to execute those answers correctly.

Practice 13 showed what that philosophy may look like at the receiving positions. Oregon is not necessarily trying to find one receiver who has to dominate targets or one personnel grouping it has to live inside. The Ducks appear to be building toward a collection of receivers and tight ends capable of changing the offensive picture according to the defense while maintaining one expectation regardless of who receives the football.

Douglas summarized it better than anyone when he was asked whether Oregon has a true No. 1 receiver.

“I don’t really worry about that, whether who’s one, who’s two, who’s five,” Douglas said. “It don’t really matter. I think we have a collection of really good guys who could play winning football for us.”

That may be the most important receiver statement we have heard all camp.

Oregon may not need a traditional No. 1 receiver

There is a natural temptation to take a room this talented and rank it. Stewart looks like the obvious candidate to become the marquee name because we already know what his high-end ability looks like. McClellan emerged down the stretch last season and continues receiving increasingly strong evaluations. Moore has explosiveness Oregon wants to maximize, while the younger players continue creating pressure from underneath.

Douglas does not appear particularly interested in solving the room that way.

“Anyone could be the number one in that moment,” he said. “It’s just whoever has a hot hand at the time. Maybe it’s dictated by defense. Maybe they’re taking away a certain player and another guy, kind of that’s his day.”

The second half of that answer is where the offensive possibilities become much more interesting. Douglas is not simply saying Oregon has several good receivers and does not care who gets credit. He is describing a passing game capable of allowing the defense to help determine where the production comes from.

If an opponent devotes additional coverage toward Stewart, Oregon wants another player capable of punishing the adjustment. If a matchup favors McClellan inside, the offense does not need to force targets elsewhere simply because somebody carries a higher profile. A defense that changes personnel or leverage to handle one receiver may create an entirely different opportunity for a tight end.

“I don’t think we necessarily need to have a true number one,” Douglas said. “I think we have a collection of guys who could hurt you in multiple ways.”

That fits Mehringer’s larger offensive vision much better than a traditional target hierarchy would. Early in camp, he said wide receivers had to earn everything because “it’s a meritocracy,” even using Wally Pipp and Lou Gehrig as an example of what can happen when one player leaves an opportunity available for another.

Nearly two weeks later, Douglas sounds less interested in establishing an order than maximizing the players who survive that competition.

The most important receiver statistic may involve the plays when he never touches the ball

Douglas provided perhaps the best explanation yet of what Oregon means by playing winning football at receiver when he was asked what he wants to see from the room in Saturday’s second scrimmage.

He brought up a study he did with his receivers using Ja’Marr Chase. Even during a season in which Chase won the receiving triple crown, Douglas noted that he played roughly 1,100 snaps and received 183 targets.

Douglas’ conclusion was not about Chase’s production. It was about all the other plays.

“Eighty-three percent of the time he played, he didn’t have the football,” Douglas said. “So that’s a big monster in our room. Like, what impact are you making on the field when you do not have the football?”

That question may ultimately determine how deep Oregon’s receiver rotation becomes.

A talented receiver can create separation. Oregon has plenty of those. A young player can make an extraordinary catch during fall camp and demonstrate why he was highly recruited. The harder evaluation is whether he can remain valuable during the overwhelming percentage of offensive snaps when Dante Moore is throwing somewhere else or the offense is running the football.

Douglas specifically pointed toward blocking and route responsibility.

“What is your impact in the run game?” he said. “What is your impact on a route that you might have to run to get somebody else open?”

McClellan spoke about the same standard from inside the room and made it sound less like an occasional coaching emphasis than part of the group’s identity.

“We embrace that a lot,” McClellan said. “Just blocking without the ball, like turning our body up when we don’t have the ball, things like that. I would say it’s in our nature just to be physical in that room.”

That physicality matters because explosives do not always belong to the player who produces the yardage. A running back turning a short gain into 30 yards may owe part of the play to a receiver removing a defensive back from the alley. A tight end can become the beneficiary of a route designed to occupy a safety, just as the tight end’s route can create space for a receiver elsewhere.

McClellan understands that connection.

“Always making sure we’re blocking to create those explosive plays for our backs, tight ends, things like that,” he said. “It’s amazing.”

Douglas wants that mentality to become one of the defining features of the room.

“Just really make us a selfless room,” he said, “so we could become one of the most dependable units on the offense.”

That last word may matter even more than explosive.

Oregon entered camp with very little question about whether the receiver room contained enough athletic ability. The question was whether all of that ability could become dependable football, something that requires much more than catching passes.

Jeremiah McClellan is becoming the clearest example of the complete standard

Lanning provided important context earlier this week when he was asked why McClellan continues standing out.

He did not begin with catches.

Lanning pointed toward how much stronger McClellan has become at the point of attack, describing an area that was once a weakness as something that became a weapon last season and has continued developing this fall. “He’s playing with violence,” Lanning said, while also pointing toward McClellan’s speed in and out of breaks and increased leadership.

Douglas’ explanation Friday showed how that progression developed.

“Experience is your best teacher,” Douglas said.

McClellan accumulated more than 500 snaps last season and became increasingly important as Oregon moved deeper into the year. Douglas believes those repetitions created momentum that carried through winter conditioning, spring football and now into fall camp.

“He played big for us down the stretch, and it’s kind of carried over momentum into how he practiced in the winter, when it was winter conditioning, how he practiced in spring ball and how he’s practicing now in fall camp,” Douglas said. “So he’s just a guy who’s still ascending. He’s getting better every single day.”

McClellan, predictably, did not frame his own camp around becoming Oregon’s No. 1 receiver. Asked directly whether he feels positioned to take that role, he immediately moved the answer back toward the offense.

“I’m not sure,” McClellan said. “I’m just here to really just help the offense as much as I can possible. I know we’re going to have a crazy talented receiver room right now, so I’m just here to help the offense as much as I can.”

That answer fits the player Lanning and Douglas have been describing. The next step for McClellan is not simply accumulating more receptions than he did a year ago. Oregon wants him becoming the kind of receiver whose presence makes the offense function even on the plays when his name never enters the box score.

“Every day is going to be a game” inside this receiver room

McClellan also provided perhaps the best description of what Oregon’s receiver competition actually feels like from the inside.

“The most exciting part about being in a talented room like this is just being able, you have to bring your A game every single day,” he said. “You have to come out here and compete every single day. Every day is going to be a game.”

That is almost exactly what Mehringer wanted when he described the room as a meritocracy after Practice 3. Oregon did not recruit the younger receivers simply to create future depth, and the veterans do not retain jobs because of age or previous production. Mehringer said there were no solidified jobs at the time and made clear that everyone had to continue earning what came next.

The interesting part is that McClellan does not experience the competition as isolation.

“You can pick up things from everybody in the receiver room,” he said. “I pick up a lot of things from Stu to Corian. We just help each other out in so many different ways.”

That is an important detail in a room where the competition is becoming increasingly real. Stewart, Moore, McClellan, Hooks, Bair, Lott and the rest are not competing for abstract recognition. Oregon eventually has only so many receiver snaps and only one football.

The room is nevertheless sharing information.

McClellan also mentioned how the different coaches see the players through different lenses, giving a receiver multiple forms of correction rather than one voice prescribing one way to play the position. That begins to sound very similar to what Jack Smith described with the tight ends, where coaching responsibility spreads across the offensive staff because the positions intersect so frequently.

The more Oregon’s skill players understand the total offense, the less the structure has to depend upon a fixed lineup.

Evan Stewart is no longer simply the returning star

Stewart’s presence changes the ceiling of the receiver room, but Douglas spent as much time talking about his leadership as his ability.

“Definitely seen it continue,” Douglas said when asked whether Stewart’s offseason focus had carried through camp. “It’s been like that ever since he decided to come back, since January. So he’s had a great attitude, great mentality. He’s been a really good leader for our guys in the room.”

That continues a theme that was already evident by Media Day. Stewart’s teammates described someone who had attacked conditioning, walkthroughs and offseason work with uncommon urgency after deciding to return, with that commitment visible enough that his leadership became part of the story before Oregon ever practiced in August.

What we have heard since camp began has only strengthened that picture. The reports surrounding Stewart’s performance have been exceptional, but the more consequential development may be that Oregon appears to be getting both versions it wanted: the player capable of changing a coverage structure and the veteran capable of helping establish the receiver-room standard.

McClellan’s response Friday captured both.

“Having Evan back out there is amazing,” he said. “Evan’s a game changer.”

But McClellan also placed Stewart inside the larger group rather than above it, talking about the benefit of having him back alongside the rest of Oregon’s established weapons. That is consistent with Douglas’ refusal to identify a singular No. 1.

Stewart does not become less dangerous because Oregon has other answers.

The other answers may make him harder to take away.

Dakorian Moore is beginning to look more comfortable inside the offense

Douglas’ update on De’Corian Moore was less dramatic than some of the camp praise surrounding other receivers, but it may be equally meaningful.

“My expectation of Dakorian is just for him to be the best version of himself,” Douglas said. “He’s more comfortable in our offense and more comfortable in Oregon, and you can just start to see him just have a better understanding of what we’re trying to do offensively and just what it kind of takes to be a really good football player.”

That sounds like a player moving from talent toward command, something Oregon has emphasized with many of its second-year players.

The first year often answers whether the physical ability translates. The second begins revealing whether the player understands enough of the larger offense to become more than a collection of individual plays.

Douglas has repeatedly resisted boxing receivers into narrow positional definitions, which means comfort in the offense matters even more. Oregon wants receivers capable of learning multiple responsibilities because changing where a player aligns changes the defensive picture without forcing the Ducks to substitute.

Lanning introduced that concept at the beginning of camp when he discussed mental acuity and the value of players capable of handling multiple responsibilities. Mehringer added the warning that multiplicity only helps if Oregon can maintain execution.

Moore’s growing comfort is therefore part of a larger offensive goal.

The more he understands, the more Oregon can ask him to do.

The young receivers are being “forged through the fire”

Douglas does not sound particularly interested in protecting Oregon’s freshmen from difficult repetitions.

Asked about bringing along a group that includes several first-year players, he described his developmental philosophy directly.

“I think you learn by doing, and I believe in forging people through the fire,” Douglas said.

Oregon has the defensive personnel to make that fire unusually hot.

Douglas pointed toward the quality of the corners, nickels and safeties the young receivers see every day and the coaching staff developing them. Football provides far fewer actual games than sports such as basketball or baseball, so the enormous majority of a player’s development occurs on the practice field.

That makes the quality of the opponent across from him particularly important.

“Our young guys get to go against some of the best players in the country,” Douglas said. “Just the opportunity for them to practice against the good players that we have has definitely expedited their growth, and they’re getting close to game ready.”

That fits what we heard from Oregon’s defensive backs at Media Day, when the secondary described the receiver group as explosive, fast and talented enough that going against it every day should prepare the defense for Saturdays.

The developmental benefit works in both directions.

A freshman receiver does not get many empty repetitions at Oregon. If he runs a poor route, an elite defensive back is capable of punishing it. If his release is inefficient, the corner across from him has enough ability to expose it. If he loses focus at the catch point, another highly recruited athlete is trying to take the football away.

Douglas appears to believe those difficult repetitions accelerate the process rather than slow it.

Jalen Lott’s developmental clock started later, but Oregon keeps seeing the ability

Douglas separated Gatlin Bair and Jalen Lott because their timelines are different.

Bair arrived early enough to participate in spring practices and the installation work that came with them. Lott did not have that advantage.

“His first practice at Oregon was fall camp practice number one,” Douglas said. “So he had to get used to our intensity, just what we’re asking him to do with and without the football and how we play offense.”

The physical flashes arrived before complete comfort.

Dante Moore said earlier this week that Lott caught his attention on the very first practice when he made a move and extended for a football in a way that did not look normal for a freshman. Moore acknowledged that the playbook could still leave Lott “swimming around” at times, but he also said the freshman has been adding film work, meetings and extra post-practice repetitions with him.

Douglas now sees the comfort beginning to catch up.

“He’s gotten a lot more comfortable as training camp went on,” Douglas said.

That does not mean Oregon has declared him game ready or assigned a role, but the developmental direction is clear. The ability got him into the conversation; understanding the offense and functioning without the football will determine how long he stays there.

Gatlin Bair is no longer simply an athlete returning to football

Bair may be one of the most fascinating developmental projects in the entire offense because Oregon is trying to turn extraordinary athleticism back into football ability after an extended absence from organized football.

Douglas was candid about the transition.

“He didn’t play football for two years,” he said. “Going through spring, it’s just like, okay, I got to get used to my body moving like this again. I got to get used to this hard transition. I got to get used to feeling contact when I catch the football.”

Those were not weaknesses in Bair’s athletic profile. They were the predictable consequences of a player having to reacclimate to the sport itself.

“Experience is your best teacher, and you get better at playing football by playing football,” Douglas said.

McClellan has watched the same process occur from inside the room.

“Early on you could tell he was still, like, getting back into it,” McClellan said. “Now he’s playing football. Like, now he’s being more of a football player.”

That distinction is important because nobody has ever needed a stopwatch to establish that Bair is fast.

Douglas called him “one of the best athletes on our team,” describing a player who is big, fast, explosive, capable of jumping and conditioned enough to repeat those efforts. McClellan provided the visual evidence with one of the lighter moments of the afternoon.

Asked whether Bair really hit 24 mph, McClellan did not hesitate.

“Yes. Yes, 24 miles an hour,” he said. “He’s a speed demon for sure.”

McClellan then revealed that he had hit 23.3 mph during the same session and still found himself reacting to Bair.

“I was like, ‘Whoa,’” McClellan said. “Gat was sliding. He was definitely sliding that day.”

The speed is spectacular, but the more important line came later when McClellan described the offense slowing down for Bair.

“He’s starting to know what he’s doing on different, like, all of his assignments and things like that now,” McClellan said. “So he’s really growing right now, and he has to just keep growing.”

That may be the real Bair story through Practice 13.

Oregon already knows how fast he can run.

Now he is becoming a receiver again.

Hudson Lewis and Messiah Hampton are quietly making their own progress

McClellan also offered strong reviews of two other young receivers who have received considerably less attention than Lott and Bair.

“Hudson Lewis is doing a great job,” McClellan said. “He’s had an amazing fall camp.”

Lewis arrived during the summer rather than benefiting from spring practice, yet McClellan believes he has picked up the offense well. Messiah Hampton had a different developmental runway because he participated in spring and has been able to build from that experience into August.

“Messiah Hampton is doing an excellent job too,” McClellan said. “He had an amazing transition from spring until now.”

Those names matter because Douglas refuses to establish an arbitrary rotation number.

His goal is not to decide in advance that Oregon needs six playable receivers and then force the room into six slots.

“My goal every single season, my goal is to maximize every single player in the room,” Douglas said. “If that’s three, then it’s three. If it’s six, then it’s six. If it’s seven, then it’s seven.”

That puts the burden back on the players.

“If they can play winning football for us,” Douglas said, “they’ll be out there for us.”

Mehringer’s meritocracy has not gone anywhere. Practice 13 simply gave it a more flexible endpoint.

Iverson Hooks is another reason Oregon does not want receiver labels becoming limitations

Hooks provides perhaps the clearest example of Douglas’ resistance to positional boxes.

Asked whether the UAB transfer should be viewed primarily as a slot receiver, Douglas rejected the premise.

“I look at wide receivers like wide receivers are a skilled position,” he said. “So I don’t want to pigeonhole anybody into, you know, okay, this is a slot guy, this is an outside guy.”

Douglas believes Hooks possesses enough quickness and explosiveness to work in different environments. Those traits can help him release against coverage outside, but they also translate to short, intermediate and deep routes from the slot.

“I think Strap has a multifaceted skill set,” Douglas said.

The developmental challenge has been adjusting to Oregon’s practice standard.

“It’s different here at Oregon than it is at other institutions,” Douglas said, pointing toward the intensity of practice, the level of competition and the habits required simply to thrive through the workload.

That continues what Mehringer said after Practice 3. Hooks arrived because Oregon already believed he was good enough to help, not because the staff wanted a long-term developmental project, but he still had to expand what he understood and adjust to what the Ducks were asking.

Douglas believes that improvement has been visible from the first spring practice through Practice 13.

The important part is that Oregon is not asking Hooks to become one narrow thing.

It is trying to discover how many things he can do well enough to help.

Jack Smith sees tight end as “the second quarterback”

Everything Douglas said about receiver versatility becomes even more interesting when placed beside Smith’s description of Oregon’s tight ends.

“To me, tight end, in a sense, is really the second quarterback,” Smith said.

His reasoning has nothing to do with throwing the football.

“We ask our guys to do a lot, whether it’s pass pro, run blocking, routes, screen timing, all that stuff,” Smith said.

That description fits the way Oregon has talked about the position since Media Day. Lanning pointed toward Jamari Johnson’s ability to align as a wide receiver, in the backfield or as a conventional tight end and said the rest of fall camp would determine which players behind him could earn similar opportunities.

Johnson himself explained why his quarterback background helps him process the position. At Media Day, he said playing quarterback taught him to understand where everyone is supposed to be rather than seeing a play only through his own assignment.

Smith is now trying to develop an entire room capable of handling a broader version of that responsibility.

His own coaching background helps explain why. Smith has worked around multiple offensive position groups and learned under several coaches before taking over the tight ends. Instead of viewing those experiences as unrelated stops, he sees them as preparation for a position that intersects with almost everything Oregon does.

“We all coach each other’s dudes,” Smith said. “It’s a team deal.”

That may be one of the more revealing offensive comments of the day.

Oregon does not want a receiver who understands only receiver football or a tight end whose knowledge ends with his own route. The more overlap exists between positions, the easier it becomes for the Ducks to change formations, responsibilities and personnel pictures while keeping the same players on the field.

Smith simply calls the finished product “the Oregon offense.”

“We got the answers to everything,” he said. “At the end of the day, football is football. We’re going to go out there and it’s our job to just execute those plays.”

That is Mehringer’s complexity argument distilled to its endpoint.

Have answers, but execute them.

Jamari Johnson is becoming the bridge between Oregon’s tight end generations

Smith did not inherit a completely new room. Johnson and AJ Pugliano already knew the offense, while the newcomers arrived at different points of their own development.

That created an immediate coaching challenge.

“New guys, they got to learn the basics,” Smith said. “And then Jamari and AJ, they’ve been here and they’re at a little bit different level in the start.”

Smith’s solution has been to use the veterans as extensions of the coaching staff.

“I want them to teach in the meetings,” he said. “I want them to be the ones coaching on the sidelines at times.”

That is exactly what Lanning was already seeing from Johnson before fall camp. During spring, Lanning called him “extremely consistent,” praised his leadership and described him as “a coach on the field,” noting that Johnson was beginning to do for younger tight ends what players such as Terrance Ferguson, Patrick Herbert and Kenyon Sadiq had previously done for him.

Smith is intentionally extending that responsibility.

When Oregon two-spots practice and the tight ends are split between fields, Smith cannot be everywhere. He wants Johnson or Pugliano capable of recognizing something and giving a younger player the correction before the coach gets there.

“I’ve talked to JJ about that,” Smith said. “I was like, ‘Hey man, like I would love for you to, if you got something that you want to say, like speak up, man.’”

That gives Johnson’s leadership football value beyond setting an example.

He is becoming part of how the position gets coached.

Marcus Dixon’s defensive experience continues becoming part of his tight end identity

Smith was careful not to provide a depth chart behind Johnson, but he offered useful context on Marcus Dixon.

Dixon said at Media Day that his time playing defensive end changed how he sees blocking, describing football as a game of aggression and leverage. He also talked about working on his receiving ability while learning from teammates with different strengths.

Smith believes the development has continued.

“Marcus has done such a good job of, like you said, attacking his strengths and also attacking his weaknesses,” he said. “The growth that he’s made since he’s been here in both facets has really been fun to watch.”

That phrase, both facets, is exactly what matters at Oregon.

A tight end who can catch but cannot function in the run game tells the defense something. A blocker who becomes almost exclusively an attached player can do the same.

The more complete Dixon becomes, the less Oregon has to announce what it intends to do when he enters the game.

That is where tight end versatility becomes schematic leverage.

Andrew Olesh is making the transition from talent to complete tight end

Olesh gives Smith another developmental profile.

He entered Oregon after beginning his college career elsewhere and had to translate what he already knew into an entirely different offensive language.

“He’s just another kid that loves football,” Smith said. “It’s been fun for me to see him learn a new scheme coming from another college where he has a whole other scheme and now learning ours.”

Smith specifically praised the mental progress.

“I think he’s taken awesome leaps from the mental side of things in terms of the playbook itself,” he said.

The physical development has not been confined to the receiving part of his game.

“His ability to run around,” Smith said, “and really also made leaps in the run game as well, which has been fun to watch.”

That matters because Olesh’s reputation as a receiver has never been particularly difficult to understand. The more important question is whether Oregon can trust him across enough situations that defenses cannot treat his presence as a personnel clue.

Practice 13 suggests the answer is moving in the right direction.

Kendre Harrison is still being evaluated as a football player, not a basketball athlete

Kendre Harrison may possess the most unusual physical profile in the room, but Smith continues bringing the conversation back toward football.

“What I love about Kendre is he’s a competitor,” Smith said, before joking that Harrison still has not beaten him in a game of H-O-R-S-E.

The larger transition is more serious. Harrison spent much of his high school career balancing basketball and football, while Oregon has spent the past several months asking him to commit himself to the daily demands of one college sport.

“For any freshman, there’s always a transition period of it becoming almost like a job in a sense nowadays,” Smith said. “But he’s really taken to that challenge.”

Smith declined to say whether Harrison will play a significant role this season, reminding everyone that even Johnson still has to prove himself every day and that Oregon remains in fall camp. That caution is useful because Harrison’s physical ability makes it easy to jump ahead of the developmental process.

The reports throughout the year have consistently suggested that Harrison’s combination of size, ball skills and athleticism can create immediate matchup problems. The remaining work is becoming dependable enough in all the things Oregon asks of a tight end that the offense does not have to limit the call sheet when he is on the field.

Smith sees real progress.

“Just seeing where he was four or five months ago to where he is now has really been a pleasure to watch,” he said.

That is probably the correct place to leave the evaluation before Scrimmage Two.

The ceiling is obvious.

Saturday provides another test of the floor.

Oregon’s personnel flexibility may make the WR/TE distinction increasingly blurry

Douglas was asked how Oregon would respond if injuries again created a need for more two-tight-end personnel, as happened at times last season. His answer revealed how the staff appears to think about the offense more broadly.

“Whatever best 11 players that help us win football games and score points, that’s who will be out there,” Douglas said.

He did not limit the answer to receivers.

“Whatever collection of five skilled players, we have a lot of capable people, not just in my room, but running backs and tight ends.”

That may ultimately be the most important connection between Douglas’ interview and Smith’s.

Oregon does not appear to be building an offense in which three wide receivers, one tight end and one running back must always form the best skill combination. It is trying to develop enough people across all three rooms that Mehringer can choose the five whose abilities best attack the problem the defense presents.

Some weeks that may mean three receivers.

Another matchup could make two tight ends more valuable.

Johnson’s ability to align in several places means Oregon can shift from one picture to another without necessarily substituting. A receiver such as Hooks can move inside or outside. McClellan can affect the run game even when he is not targeted. Bair’s speed can force defensive space even on a play designed for somebody else.

The possibilities become difficult to defend only if the players remain dependable enough that Oregon does not have to sacrifice execution to access them.

That has been Mehringer’s warning since Practice 3.

Practice 13 showed the personnel that could make the theory work.

Scrimmage Two will evaluate everything except the easy numbers

Both Douglas and Smith were asked what they want from Saturday’s second scrimmage, and neither began with receiving production.

Smith wants “clean football.”

“Play clean, come out healthy,” he said. “Obviously, we want to have explosive plays as many as we can and touchdowns in my room, as well as the whole offense. So really, I hope that we go out there and there’s good back and forth for the entire team standpoint. But it boils down, in my mind, to us just playing clean, doing our job and executing.”

McClellan used almost identical language.

“Just go out there and do our job and do our assignment and play fast,” he said. “If we go out there and do that, we should just be fine.”

Douglas wants the evaluation to extend beyond what everyone else will notice.

“Everyone will see the catches, the yards, the touchdowns, the drops, whatever negative plays are,” he said. “But we’re trying to eliminate bad football every day.”

That means Saturday’s receiving evaluation should not begin by asking who caught the most passes.

Did the receivers block when the ball went somewhere else? Did they run routes with the discipline required to create openings for teammates? Did young players operate quickly enough within the offense that their athletic ability could actually appear? Did the tight ends handle their protection and run-game responsibilities well enough that Oregon could remain multiple without sacrificing execution?

Most importantly, did the group become more dependable from the first scrimmage to the second?

Douglas framed that directly.

“We just want to get better from scrimmage one to scrimmage two,” he said.

That makes Saturday another checkpoint rather than a final answer.

Practice 13 may have clarified the receiving corps without clarifying the depth chart

After thirteen practices, we still do not have a traditional answer to the simplest receiver question.

Who is Oregon’s No. 1?

Douglas does not seem particularly concerned about finding one, and after listening to all three interviews Friday, I am increasingly convinced that may be the point.

Stewart can be a game changer without needing every game to become the Evan Stewart game. McClellan can continue his ascent by becoming more dependable on the majority of snaps when he never touches the football. De’Corian Moore can become more dangerous as his understanding catches up with his ability, while Hooks gives Oregon another receiver whose value increases if he can move around rather than being labeled a slot.

Behind them, Bair is turning elite athleticism back into football instinct. Lott is trying to accelerate a developmental clock that did not begin until Practice 1. Lewis and Hampton are quietly accumulating evidence of their own, while the entire group is being tested daily against a secondary good enough to punish mistakes immediately.

The tight end room adds another layer because Johnson can function almost anywhere, Dixon brings a defender’s understanding of physicality, Olesh is becoming more complete and Harrison gives Oregon a matchup profile unlike almost anyone else in the group. Smith views the position as a second quarterback because the Ducks expect tight ends to understand enough football to make all of those responsibilities coexist.

Taken together, the picture looks less like a depth chart and more like a toolbox.

That does not mean roles will remain undefined forever. September will eventually require Oregon to determine which players receive the most meaningful repetitions, and Scrimmage Two should move that process forward.

What Practice 13 made clearer is the standard those players have to meet before the roles matter. Douglas wants receivers who can play winning football whether they get seven targets or none. Smith wants tight ends capable of participating in nearly every part of the offense, not specialists who force the play caller to reveal his intention.

McClellan may have summarized the entire environment with the simplest phrase of the day.

“Every day is going to be a game.”

That is what Oregon has created inside its receiving corps. The competition is deep enough that every practice repetition matters, but the offense is being built so the eventual reward does not have to be becoming the guy.

The reward is becoming one of the players Oregon can trust when the defense takes somebody else away.

If the Ducks can reach that point across both receiver and tight end, the question facing opponents may become much more difficult than identifying Oregon’s No. 1.

It will be deciding which answer to take away when Oregon believes it has several.

Rashad Wadood said something after Practice 12 that has stayed with me because I think it explains considerably more than the state of Oregon’s secondary. “This is the most bought-in team I’ve ever been around of guys wanting to be better for each other,” Oregon’s defensive backs coach said, and the most important part of that sentence may be the final three words.

There is a meaningful difference between wanting to become better than the player beside you and wanting to become better for him. Oregon needs both. Dan Lanning has built a program where competition is supposed to be uncomfortable, Drew Mehringer has described the roster as a meritocracy and the first scrimmage turned the idea of accountability into something tangible when Lanning said players who are not accountable and capable will receive fewer repetitions. Nobody is being promised comfort simply because the Ducks also talk about connection.

What makes Wadood’s observation interesting is that Oregon appears to be attempting something much more difficult than creating a competitive roster. The Ducks want players to battle for the same finite opportunities while simultaneously helping the person trying to take those opportunities become better. That tension has been visible throughout fall camp, and the more I think about it, the more convinced I am that its origins go much further back than anything Oregon installed this summer.

Player-led teams are not simply created during fall camp. In many ways, they are recruited years in advance.

Better for each other only matters when competition has a cost

The idea of players developing one another sounds wonderful when the depth chart remains hypothetical. It becomes considerably more revealing when the competition begins producing winners and losers, which is where Oregon increasingly finds itself as camp moves toward its second scrimmage.

The quarterback room provides an obvious example.

Read more

Oregon has spent months talking about becoming a player-led team. Twelve practices into fall camp, the clearest evidence may not be who gives the loudest speech, but how often Ducks are beginning to teach, challenge and develop one another.

There is a version of leadership in football that is easy to recognize because it is impossible to miss. It is the player at the center of the huddle, the voice everyone hears after a bad period or the veteran speaking to the team when practice ends. Oregon has talked extensively this offseason about becoming more player-led, and it would be easy to measure that progress by counting those moments.

I am starting to think the more important evidence is considerably quieter.

Brian Michalowski offered an interesting example this week when he explained how he approaches development with Oregon’s linebackers. At the beginning of practice, he asks players what they want to emphasize that day. He still coaches them, corrects them and establishes the standard, but he also wants the player to recognize his own weakness and take responsibility for attacking it.

“If it’s important to them and if it’s something that they want to get better at, they’ll attack it,” Michalowski said.

That is a small coaching detail, but it connects to something we have heard throughout fall camp. Oregon increasingly wants development to become something players participate in rather than something coaches simply do to them. The further that idea advances, the more knowledge begins moving sideways through a roster instead of always coming from the top down.

Jerry Mixon provides a good example. Oregon wants him to become a more commanding voice in the middle of the defense, but nobody is asking him to manufacture a personality that is not his own. Mixon described it as learning how to “flip the switch,” remaining himself away from football while becoming more communicative and assertive when the defense needs him to take control.

His leadership with younger linebackers sounds different. Mixon talked about checking on freshmen who are away from their families, asking how they are handling the grind of camp and sharing his own experience of coming through Oregon’s program. The football instruction matters, but sometimes leadership begins with an older player remembering what it felt like when everything was new.

That distinction became even more interesting when Rashad Wadood described what he sees happening in Oregon’s secondary.

“This is the most bought-in team I’ve ever been around of guys wanting to be better for each other,” Wadood said.

There is a lot packed into those final three words.

Better for each other is different from better than each other

Oregon has not spent fall camp trying to create a comfortable environment. Drew Mehringer called the roster a meritocracy early in camp, while Dan Lanning has repeatedly made clear that players have to earn their role every day. By this point in August, those competitions are becoming increasingly consequential because repetitions are beginning to become roles.

That would make it perfectly understandable if players became protective of what they know.

A veteran offensive lineman could decide the freshman behind him will eventually have to figure things out on his own. A defensive back could view every correction he gives a younger teammate as potentially helping someone take his snaps. A quarterback could treat the players beneath him on the depth chart as competitors rather than partners.

Oregon appears to be trying to create the opposite response.

Iapani “Poncho” Laloulu has been pouring time into younger offensive linemen such as Tommy Tofi and Manny Iheanacho while still carrying his own responsibilities as the veteran center. Dante Moore talked this week about working after practice with freshman receiver Jalen Lott, who has enough physical ability to catch his quarterback’s attention but is still learning the enormous amount of information required to play as a young receiver.

The quarterback room may provide an even better example. Moore is the established starter, yet Koa Ka’ai describes a room where Dylan Raiola, Brock Thomas and Akili Smith Jr. continue sharing information and pushing one another. Smith has even reached the point where he has developed his own study system, taking what he has learned inside the room and adapting it to the way he personally processes football.

That is what player-led development should eventually become. The veteran does not simply demonstrate the standard and hope everyone else notices. He helps the next player understand how to reach it.

Oregon’s depth makes that kind of leadership harder

This would be easier if Oregon had obvious holes everywhere.

When a freshman knows he is clearly two years away from competing with the veteran helping him, there is very little immediate tension in the relationship. When two players are genuinely competing for the same role, generosity becomes more difficult.

Oregon has a lot of those situations right now.

The defensive backfield is deep enough that Wadood can talk about Na’eem Offord making tremendous progress while Brandon Finney enters his second season after an exceptional freshman year and Ify Obidegwu continues developing as both a player and leader. Davon Benjamin can move between corner and nickel, Dorian Brew is progressing toward a role, and the staff continues finding ways to create opportunities for a talented room.

Yet Wadood said the players do not experience those relationships the same way the outside world often frames them.

“They challenge each other. They support each other. They all about getting better.”

That may be one of the most important cultural tests Oregon faces over the remaining weeks of camp. It is relatively easy to support a teammate when everyone still believes there are unlimited opportunities available. It becomes more revealing when the depth chart starts telling somebody that another player has earned the first repetition.

The same challenge exists on the defensive line, at receiver, along the offensive front and perhaps most visibly in the quarterback room. Oregon can keep developing everyone, but eventually one quarterback becomes No. 2, five offensive linemen take the first snap and only so many receivers can be on the field at once.

If the culture changes the moment those decisions become real, all the summer talk about connection will have meant very little.

If it survives them, Oregon may have something considerably more valuable.

The best player-led teams distribute knowledge

One of the mistakes we make when discussing culture is treating it as an emotional condition. We ask whether players like each other, whether the locker room feels close or whether everyone appears happy when somebody else succeeds.

Those things matter, but they do not fully explain what a functioning football culture accomplishes.

A mature culture distributes knowledge.

The quarterback understands enough of the offense to help the receiver. The veteran linebacker recognizes what a freshman is struggling with because he remembers going through the same transition. The experienced offensive lineman shows a young player how to prepare his body, manage the workload and understand the detail required to survive inside.

The process keeps repeating until the standard no longer belongs exclusively to the coaching staff.

That is why Lanning’s early-camp question remains one of my favorite things he has said this August. After players had survived another difficult day, he asked them essentially the next question in their development: You made it. Who did you bring with you?

Twelve practices later, we are beginning to see some of the answers.

Moore is bringing younger players with him. Laloulu is doing it. Mixon is trying to do it. Veterans across Oregon’s defensive front are helping develop players who will eventually take meaningful repetitions of their own.

The evidence does not mean Oregon has reached some finished version of a player-led team. Mixon openly acknowledged he can become a better communicator, and coaches continue challenging veterans to expand their influence.

What matters is the direction.

Oregon is trying to build a program where improving yourself eventually carries another responsibility: helping someone beside you improve too.

That makes Wadood’s description particularly useful. He did not say this was the most talented group he has coached or the most competitive.

He called it the most bought-in group he has been around because players want to become better for each other.

If that survives the moment when competition starts taking repetitions away from some of them, Oregon may have found something far more meaningful than another August slogan.

It may have found a culture capable of reproducing itself.

Brian Michalowski wants Jerry Mixon to become the voice connecting the entire defense, Rashad Wadood sees a secondary more committed to collective growth than individual standing, and Oregon’s expanding personnel flexibility keeps pointing toward the same goal: get the best 11 on the field without lowering the standard.

There has been no shortage of discussion about Oregon’s defensive talent during fall camp. The defensive front may be one of the deepest groups in the country. The secondary has enough options that players can be moved between spots without creating obvious holes elsewhere. The linebacker room has experience, speed and enough young talent behind it that the Ducks can continue developing the future while preparing for the present.

Practice 12 offered a better question than simply asking how talented all of those pieces might be.

Can Oregon make them operate together?

Linebackers coach Brian Michalowski kept returning to communication. Jerry Mixon talked about learning to “flip the switch” from a naturally quieter personality into a more commanding presence on the field. Defensive backs coach Rashad Wadood described a room where the distinction between starter, reserve, walk-on and former blue-chip prospect matters far less internally than the standard every player is expected to meet.

Taken together, the three interviews provided one of the clearest explanations yet of what Oregon is trying to build defensively. The multiplicity Chris Hampton has discussed since the beginning of camp only works if players understand more than their own assignments. Position flexibility only matters if moving someone does not create communication problems somewhere else. Depth only becomes valuable if the player entering the game operates according to the same expectations as the player leaving it.

Eleven practices brought Oregon to the point where Dan Lanning was talking about adapting practice to correct what the first scrimmage exposed. Practice 12 showed another part of that progression.

The Ducks are not simply trying to determine who can play.

They are trying to create enough shared understanding that whoever plays can make the defense function.

Jerry Mixon’s next step is becoming the voice Oregon needs in the middle

Mixon has never lacked experience in Oregon’s defense, and Michalowski believes that experience is becoming increasingly visible.

“Jerry’s done a great job in fall camp,” Michalowski said. “His experience within the defense is really showing, playing confident, playing fast, leading others, just playing his style of game, which is attacking the football.”

The part Oregon wants to expand has less to do with Mixon’s athletic ability than what happens before the football moves.

Last season, Mixon was used more frequently toward the field in Oregon’s linebacker structure, which could leave him somewhat removed from the center of the box depending upon the call. This fall, Michalowski wants the communication to become broader.

“We have to communicate across the defense at an extremely high level,” Michalowski said. “I just want him to really be that voice to the entire defense.”

That requirement fits where Oregon’s defense has been heading throughout camp. Hampton has talked about a multiple system built around getting the best players onto the field and allowing the personnel to dictate what the Ducks emphasize. That creates advantages, but every additional alignment, front and coverage also creates another opportunity for somebody to hear the wrong call or process it too slowly.

Mixon’s value therefore extends beyond making the tackle.

Oregon wants him helping everybody else arrive at the tackle knowing exactly what they are supposed to do.

Michalowski believes the foundation is already there because Mixon has relationships throughout the roster.

“He’s a leader in the style of he’s very close with a lot of his teammates,” Michalowski said. “So it starts with that connection that he has with his teammates. But the confidence and vocal leadership on the football field comes from knowledge and just really having that voice command.”

That final part is important.

Oregon is not asking Mixon to manufacture volume for the sake of appearing like a leader. The voice is supposed to come from certainty.

Know the defense well enough that the communication becomes automatic.

Michalowski’s leadership development starts by making the player own it

The most interesting part of Michalowski’s explanation was how he actually develops that kind of leadership.

Telling a player to “be more vocal” is easy. Turning that instruction into a repeatable behavior is considerably harder, particularly when the player’s natural personality does not involve constantly commanding a room.

Michalowski’s approach is to make the player participate in defining his own development.

At the beginning of practice, often during stretch, he goes from linebacker to linebacker and asks a simple question.

“What do you want to really emphasize today?”

The answer becomes the player’s individual target for that practice.

“I ask them what they want to get better at, and they drive their development,” Michalowski said. “If I’m really pushing communication to them in the meeting room, in the classroom, usually the players will come out that next day and know what they have to get better at.”

That is a subtle but meaningful difference from a coach standing behind a player repeatedly yelling a correction.

Michalowski still establishes the standard. He still identifies the weaknesses. But he wants the player to become sufficiently self-aware that improvement stops belonging only to the coach.

“If it’s important to them and if it’s something that they want to get better at, they’ll attack it,” Michalowski said. “That’s really kind of my methodology when it comes to development.”

That idea has surfaced elsewhere throughout Oregon’s camp. Elijah Rushing creates cut-ups and brings questions to individual meetings with Lanning. Akili Smith Jr. developed his own whiteboard study routine because he found a method that better suited the way he processes information. Lanning has talked repeatedly about players becoming increasingly responsible for bringing others along.

Michalowski gave us the linebacker version.

Development becomes more sustainable when the player can identify what he needs before the coach has to remind him.

Mixon is learning to “flip the switch”

Mixon’s own description of the leadership challenge sounded much more personal.

He knows he is not naturally the loudest personality away from football. His solution has been to separate the person from the role without pretending to become somebody else.

“Really just flipping the switch,” Mixon said.

He traced that idea back to watching Luke Kuechly when he was younger, seeing a player who could be relatively quiet away from football but become something entirely different between the lines.

“I used to watch Luke Kuechly videos when I was younger,” Mixon said. “Say he’s a quiet guy, and then once you get on the field, you flip the switch.”

For Mixon, the effort has even started affecting how he communicates outside football. He mentioned working on communication with his family because he increasingly sees the skill as something larger than simply calling fronts and coverages.

“I feel like that goes a long way,” Mixon said. “Communication, that works out everything. So just communicating with my teammates and getting the defense along.”

That makes his development particularly interesting entering the second half of camp.

Mixon does not need to become someone who dominates every conversation. Oregon needs him to become someone whose teammates hear certainty when the defense requires it.

There is a difference.

The game has slowed down enough for Mixon to start seeing more before the snap

The reason Mixon can become that communicator is that the defense no longer looks as fast to him as it once did.

Asked what he meant by refining the “little things,” Mixon rattled off details that sound minor until they determine whether a linebacker wins or loses a rep: keeping tight feet in the box, avoiding crossover steps, striking blocks properly, improving hand placement and reading the triangle of keys before the snap.

Then he moved from mechanics to anticipation.

“The game has slowed down a lot,” Mixon said. “It’s reading offensive formations, what they like to do, tendencies and then their best players. Teams like to get to their best player.”

That is where experience begins turning into something more valuable than simply having played a lot of football.

A younger linebacker sees motion.

An experienced one begins understanding why the offense is creating it.

A younger player recognizes a formation.

A veteran begins connecting that formation to tendency, personnel and where the football is likely to go.

The physical play may look faster as a result, but what actually changed happened before the snap.

Michalowski sees that confidence translating into Mixon playing more like himself.

Mixon sees the game giving him more time.

That combination is exactly what Oregon needs if he is going to become the voice connecting the defense.

A healthy Devon Jackson changes the linebacker equation

The linebacker room is also benefiting from something it has not consistently had: a healthy Devon Jackson accumulating uninterrupted football repetitions.

Michalowski used one of the staff’s recurring developmental ideas when explaining why that matters.

“You get better playing football by playing football.”

Jackson has enough experience in Oregon’s defense that the conceptual foundation is already established. What he needed was the ability to stack practices without his body interrupting the process.

Michalowski believes that is happening.

“He’s been able to stay healthy and keep his body in the prime condition that it’s in,” Michalowski said. “So he’s flying around. He’s playing extremely physical.”

The coach pointed back to a strong spring and said Jackson is carrying many of the same traits into fall camp while also providing energy and leadership.

That gives Oregon another experienced linebacker capable of handling meaningful responsibility while the younger group develops behind him.

The value becomes even greater in a defense that wants to stay multiple. Hampton does not want flexibility confined to one or two versatile stars. The more experienced players who can understand the entire structure, the less Oregon has to simplify when personnel changes.

Jackson staying healthy therefore creates more than depth.

It creates optionality.

Oregon’s freshmen are getting repetitions, but roles are about to matter more

Michalowski’s comments about the young linebackers also revealed where Oregon believes camp is headed.

The Ducks intentionally use “two-spot” work, allowing multiple groups to practice simultaneously so younger players accumulate far more repetitions than they might in a traditional practice structure. That gives freshmen a chance to learn by actually playing rather than spending August watching veterans take nearly every meaningful snap.

Again, Michalowski returned to the same phrase.

“You get better playing football by playing football.”

The freshmen receive bonus meetings, additional teaching and practice opportunities, but Michalowski also acknowledged that developmental opportunity eventually runs into the reality of the season.

“As we approach this season, I think it’s really important that the team understands roles and accepts those,” he said.

That may be one of the more significant sentences from Practice 12.

Oregon spent the early portion of camp opening competitions and creating possibilities. The first scrimmage began narrowing them. Now coaches are increasingly talking about role acceptance.

That does not mean development stops. It means the roster is getting closer to the point where everyone cannot prepare as though the same number of snaps belongs to them.

For young linebackers such as Hodge, Phillips and Gavin Nix, the immediate role may include special teams, developmental work or being prepared behind a veteran rather than receiving a featured defensive workload. Mixon views bringing them along as part football instruction and part understanding what the transition itself feels like.

He said he checks on how the younger players are handling being away from family and the grind of fall camp, then shares pieces of his own path through the program.

“They’ve been down in the meeting room, asking a lot of questions, staying extra,” Mixon said. “So they’re going to pan out great.”

That is veteran leadership in a form that does not require shouting.

Sometimes bringing a younger player along starts by remembering what it felt like to be him.

The green dot matters less than the communication around it

Michalowski also offered useful context on something that can be overinterpreted from outside the program: which linebacker wears the green dot and receives the defensive call.

His answer was essentially that Oregon does not want the communication structure dependent upon one person.

“Everyone that’s on the field pretty much has a green dot in my room,” Michalowski said.

He called the distinction somewhat overrated because receiving the call is only the beginning. Every defender still needs to echo it.

“You have to echo the call. You have to echo the front communication, the coverage communication,” Michalowski said.

That tells us something important about how Oregon wants the defense to operate.

The green dot may identify whose helmet receives Hampton’s voice.

It does not identify the only person responsible for making sure the defense hears it.

That responsibility belongs to everybody.

In a defense built around disguises, multiple fronts and players capable of moving between positions, redundant communication becomes protection against breakdown. One player misses a call, another echoes it. One side adjusts, the other side hears the adjustment.

The objective is not one brilliant communicator.

It is a defense that communicates collectively.

Nasir Wyatt’s versatility is becoming easier to understand

Few players represent Oregon’s desire to find the best 11 more clearly than Nasir Wyatt.

The conversation around Wyatt began with his pass-rush ability, but coaches have increasingly emphasized that he has grown beyond being a player who only needs to enter the game when everybody knows the quarterback is throwing.

Michalowski said Wyatt has “developed immensely” against the run while also learning multiple spots.

“Naz is a tremendous pass rusher, but he’s developed immensely in terms of the run game as well and knowing multiple spots,” Michalowski said.

That opens possibilities because Hampton is less interested in assigning a rigid positional label than finding ways to maximize what a player does best.

“We’re a multiple defense,” Michalowski said. “What Coach Hamp is very aware of is getting our best 11 on the field and utilizing players for their strengths. So we’ll find opportunities to utilize Naz’s strengths and go from there.”

Mixon sees the athletic ability required to make that work.

“He’s very athletic,” Mixon said. “I feel like he can play that position easily. He got a nice little wiggle bend to him, and he’s fast.”

That does not necessarily mean Oregon is converting Wyatt into a conventional inside linebacker. It means the Ducks have another player whose presence does not have to advertise exactly what the defense is doing.

That distinction could become important.

If Wyatt can rush, play the run and function away from the line when required, Hampton can change the structure after the offense has already made its personnel decision.

The more players Oregon develops who can do that, the harder the defensive picture becomes to diagnose.

Mixon believes the running backs are helping prepare Oregon for the Big Ten

The daily competition between offense and defense also surfaced in Mixon’s interview.

Asked which group pushes the linebackers most consistently, he immediately pointed toward Oregon’s running backs. The two position groups have spent significant time in crossover work and have developed a competitive relationship that Mixon believes remains healthy because the players understand what the repetitions are supposed to accomplish.

“We got a brotherhood in the locker room, and we bring that to the field,” Mixon said. “No hard feelings. We’re just trying to get each other better.”

Jordon Davison provides one particularly useful version of that work.

Mixon has known Davison since both were younger players in the Bay Area and understands the physicality he brings. From a linebacker’s perspective, facing that style in August can make later Saturdays less surprising.

“We’re not going to see too much running backs that play like him in the Big Ten,” Mixon said. “So seeing that every day, his physicality just gets us prepared for the game.”

That is another example of something we have heard repeatedly during camp: Oregon’s greatest internal advantage may be the difficulty of its own practice environment.

The defensive front tests the offensive line.

The secondary tests the receivers.

The running backs test the linebackers.

The roster is deep enough that some of Oregon’s most demanding repetitions can come before the opponent ever arrives.

Na’eem Offord’s development is becoming about approach as much as ability

If the linebacker discussion centered on communication, Rashad Wadood’s secondary conversation centered overwhelmingly on development and togetherness.

Na’eem Offord may provide the clearest example.

“The growth has been tremendous,” Wadood said. “He’s committed to working hard. He comes in to meet extra, watch extra film. He trains extra.”

The athletic ability has never been particularly difficult to see.

The important development is how he approaches the work.

“His approach to the game is just that of a vet,” Wadood said. “It’s been really impressive to see.”

That description helps contextualize the increasingly positive information surrounding Offord throughout camp. His emergence has given Oregon more flexibility at corner, which in turn has allowed the staff to experiment with players such as Brandon Finney in other spots.

The chain reaction is important.

One young corner becoming trustworthy does not merely improve the depth behind a starter.

It gives the entire secondary more possibilities.

Brandon Finney’s challenge is pretending last season never happened

Finney enters this camp from almost the opposite position.

He does not need to prove that a young player can handle major college football. He already did it.

Wadood’s challenge is making sure success does not become the standard against which Finney judges himself.

“He just realizes last year doesn’t matter,” Wadood said. “It’s all about what you’re going to do next.”

That is a particularly relevant challenge for a player whose freshman season created significantly more attention than he had when he arrived. Wadood does not believe Finney is allowing that attention to alter his approach.

“He’s just focused on getting better, focused on himself, focused on what he’s going to do next.”

When asked what allowed Finney to contribute so quickly in the first place, Wadood did not start with speed, length or technique.

He started with drive.

“Probably the most driven kid I’ve ever been around,” Wadood said.

What impressed the coach was that Finney did not arrive obsessed with a specific outcome. According to Wadood, the goal was never simply to start as a freshman or become an All-American. The objective was improvement, and the eventual recognition became a consequence rather than the target.

“He just wanted to get better,” Wadood said. “So regardless of what the outcome of his season was last year, he was going to put that same work in regardless. That’s who he is.”

That mentality may be especially important now because repeating success can be psychologically more difficult than pursuing it for the first time.

Last season proved what Finney could do.

Wadood wants him focused on what he has not done yet.

Ify Obidegwu is not lost anywhere inside Oregon’s building

The external conversation around a deep secondary naturally creates hierarchies.

One player receives more attention. Another name appears more frequently in preseason discussions. Somebody becomes the assumed starter while another is described as competing for the role.

Wadood made clear that the room itself does not necessarily experience those distinctions the same way.

Asked whether Ify Obidegwu can sometimes become overlooked alongside players such as Finney, Wadood rejected the premise.

“I don’t think he gets lost in the shuffle, maybe the outside, but in the building everybody knows he’s a leader,” Wadood said. “He’s a hard worker.”

The competition remains real, but Wadood believes the players do not treat another player’s success as something threatening their own development.

“They challenge each other. They support each other. They all about getting better.”

That fits what we have heard about Oregon’s secondary since Media Day, but Practice 12 gave it additional weight because the competition is much closer to producing actual roles.

It is easy to celebrate everybody in early August.

The harder part comes when the snap counts begin separating.

Wadood believes the room is built to withstand that.

Dorian Brew’s progression is moving toward contribution

Dorian Brew represents another developmental path entirely.

His timeline was interrupted, leaving him behind some players from the same age group in terms of accumulated football experience. Wadood emphasized that those players may have entered college at roughly the same stage of life, but development rarely occurs at identical speed.

“Everybody has a different progression level,” Wadood said.

Brew’s progression, however, has accelerated.

“Dorian’s progression has been night and day,” Wadood said. “He’s getting better. He’s going to be contributing for us this year.”

The environment around him helps.

Brew can learn from players who arrived around the same time but have already accumulated meaningful experience. Instead of treating that difference as evidence he is behind permanently, Wadood sees him using the room as motivation.

That is where Oregon’s depth again becomes developmental rather than simply numerical.

The experienced players provide the standard.

The developing player gets to see exactly what reaching it looks like.

Davon Benjamin is making versatility part of his argument

Davon Benjamin’s camp continues to become more interesting because Oregon does not have to define him narrowly.

Wadood described him as an “all-around DB” capable of playing corner and nickel, then emphasized the traits that have allowed his role to expand.

“Very smart kid, works hard, pays attention to detail,” Wadood said. “He’s grown tremendously since he got here in the spring.”

That aligns with everything we have heard about the STAR competition. Benjamin and Carl Williams have remained extremely close because both are playing well, and Benjamin’s ability to move between corner and nickel gives Hampton another way to preserve favorable personnel without treating the depth chart as a series of rigid boxes.

Wadood again resisted connecting development to a predetermined outcome.

“He came here for development, and that’s all he’s focused on,” he said.

That does not mean Benjamin is indifferent to starting.

It means Wadood wants improvement to remain the process rather than allowing the desired role to become the only measure of whether the process is working.

On a roster this deep, that distinction becomes essential because good football players are inevitably going to be asked to wait, rotate or contribute differently than they imagined.

“There’s one standard in the back end”

One answer from Wadood may have summarized the secondary better than anything else Wednesday.

Asked about scholarship players who begin as walk-ons, specifically Zach Grisham, Wadood immediately rejected the idea that Oregon operates with different expectations depending upon how somebody arrived.

“There’s one standard in the back end,” Wadood said. “So it’s not, ‘Oh, you’re a walk-on,’ or you’re this, or you’re holding this. Everybody’s held to the same standard.”

Then he explained why.

“You’re only as strong as your weakest link.”

That philosophy becomes particularly important in the secondary because one breakdown can invalidate ten correct assignments. A corner can play excellent coverage, the rush can reach the quarterback, two linebackers can fit the run correctly and a safety can still surrender a touchdown by missing one responsibility.

The defense does not receive partial credit because most of the players were right.

“We’re pushing everybody in the room, walk-on, scholarship, starter, non-starter, it doesn’t matter,” Wadood said. “It’s one standard.”

That may be the best connection between the three Practice 12 interviews.

Michalowski wants communication everywhere, not only from the player with the green dot.

Mixon wants everybody operating from the same page.

Wadood wants every defensive back held to the same standard regardless of his standing.

Oregon is trying to make the defense less dependent upon labels.

Wadood believes togetherness may become Oregon’s separating factor

The strongest statement of the day came when Wadood was asked where the secondary had made its largest improvement during camp.

He did not say man coverage.

He did not say ball skills.

He did not mention technique.

“It’s truly the togetherness,” Wadood said. “The togetherness and committing to the grind and not their individual goals.”

That answer could easily sound like another August culture statement if Wadood had stopped there.

He did not.

“I’ve been coaching for nine years now,” Wadood said. “This is the most bought-in team I’ve ever been around of guys wanting to be better for each other. And I think that’s going to be a big separating factor for us.”

Mixon offered a nearly identical assessment from inside the locker room.

Asked what feels different about this camp, he pointed toward shared urgency.

“I feel like we all know what’s at stake,” Mixon said. “We put that pressure on ourselves because we raise the standard each and every year.”

When asked what he actually sees on the field that makes the defense feel different, Mixon went to effort.

“Everybody’s been flying around, making plays, if we’re younger or older, just all treating each other the same.”

That last phrase is worth remembering.

Treating each other the same does not mean pretending everybody has the same role.

Michalowski explicitly said the season requires players to understand and accept different roles.

It means the standard does not change when those roles do.

Practice 12 gave us a better way to understand Oregon’s defensive depth

Depth can become one of the emptiest words in preseason football.

Every team claims to have more of it. Every position coach praises the next player. Every roster looks impressive when nobody has to prove how the eighth or ninth option performs with the game on the line.

Practice 12 offered a more useful definition.

Oregon’s defensive depth will matter if Jerry Mixon can communicate well enough to connect the people around him. It will matter if Devon Jackson remains healthy enough to stack the repetitions his experience can turn into fast football. It will matter if young linebackers accept early roles while continuing to prepare for larger ones.

It will matter if Nasir Wyatt can become versatile enough that Hampton can keep an elite pass-rush athlete on the field without advertising exactly what is coming. It will matter if Na’eem Offord’s veteran approach accelerates his readiness, if Dorian Brew continues closing the developmental gap and if Davon Benjamin can perform at multiple spots without the standard changing.

Most importantly, it will matter if Wadood is right about the thing separating this group.

Togetherness is useful only when it survives competition.

Oregon has spent nearly three weeks putting enough talented players into competition that some good ones will inevitably receive fewer repetitions than they want. The second scrimmage will move those decisions another step closer to reality, and the depth chart will become increasingly difficult to ignore.

That is why role acceptance, communication and one shared standard suddenly matter more now than they did when camp opened.

The Ducks already appear to have enough athletes.

Practice 12 suggested the next challenge is making sure all of those athletes hear the same call, understand the same responsibility and play according to the same standard when the football finally moves.

If Oregon can accomplish that, depth stops being a roster count.

It becomes a defense.

There is a stage of fall camp when depth becomes almost intoxicating. Every young player who flashes creates another possibility, every veteran who can move between positions gives the staff another answer, and coaches can talk about eight offensive linemen, a deep defensive-front rotation, multiple STAR candidates and three quarterbacks behind an established starter without immediately confronting the less comfortable part of roster construction.

Eventually, all those possibilities need repetitions, and repetitions are finite. That is why Dan Lanning’s comments following Oregon’s first fall scrimmage were more consequential than another August reminder that competition matters. Oregon went through approximately 120 plays before Lanning explained that every player would eventually be judged through two questions.

“Are you accountable and are you capable?” Lanning said. “Do you do your job when you’re asked to do your job and are you capable of doing the job we ask you to do?”

The consequence followed immediately.

“If you’re not, then you’re going to get limited reps,” Lanning said. “If you do, then you’ll continue to grow on this team.”

That changes the nature of fall camp. Oregon began August trying to discover how many players could help, but the next stage requires deciding how much each one gets to help. The competition has not ended. It has simply reached the point where winning it begins carrying something tangible.

The most valuable currency in the building is becoming repetitions

Read more

The Ducks spent the first half of fall camp creating options. After the first scrimmage, the next stage is deciding which players receive the repetitions, roles and trust that come with Saturdays.

For most of August, Oregon could afford to talk about competition almost entirely in positive terms. Dan Lanning wanted six, seven or eight offensive linemen capable of winning football. Chris Hampton insisted nobody owned a starting position. Drew Mehringer called Oregon a meritocracy, while position coaches throughout the roster described depth as an opportunity to develop more players rather than a problem that needed to be solved immediately.

The first scrimmage changed the equation because competition eventually has to produce consequences. Lanning explained afterward that Oregon would grade players on two questions, whether they were accountable enough to perform their responsibility and capable enough to physically execute it. Then he attached playing time to the answer.

“If you’re not, then you’re going to get limited reps,” Lanning said. “If you do, then you’ll continue to grow on this team.”

That may be the most important transition Oregon makes between now and its second scrimmage Saturday. Fall camp began by trying to create as many viable possibilities as possible. The remaining weeks increasingly become about deciding which possibilities deserve the finite resource every football team eventually runs out of.

Repetitions.

Quarterback depth is about to require an order

Oregon does not have a quarterback competition at the top. Dante Moore’s return settled that long before fall camp, and quarterbacks coach Koa Ka’ai said after Practice 10 that Moore’s third year in the program has reached the point where “there’s not much that we can’t do right now at all.”

What remains unsettled is everything behind him.

Ka’ai said Oregon believes Dylan Raiola, Brock Thomas and Akili “KJ” Smith Jr. are all capable of winning games, but each reaches that point differently. Raiola brings extensive Big Ten starting experience and has dramatically improved his pocket movement and body since arriving. Thomas carries years of institutional knowledge and has already won an important game for Oregon when called upon. Smith gives the room a unique physical package and has taken what Ka’ai called a “huge leap” in learning to operate within the offense rather than allowing all of Oregon’s schematic options to overwhelm him.

That is excellent depth in August. It becomes a logistical problem in September because the second quarterback needs enough repetitions to function like the second quarterback.

Ka’ai acknowledged that reality when discussing how Oregon will eventually organize the room. There are only so many practice snaps and meeting minutes available during a game week, which means Oregon cannot indefinitely divide meaningful backup preparation three ways.

“You kind of got to decide who it’s going to be,” Ka’ai said. “The team has to know for some continuity purposes, for rep purposes.”

That decision does not necessarily have to arrive this week, but the calendar is beginning to make it unavoidable.

Oregon’s defensive-line depth is becoming actual playing depth

Tony Tuioti gave us perhaps the clearest example Monday of how competition begins becoming allocation.

Everyone knew Oregon returned an experienced defensive front. What has made camp more interesting is how difficult it may be to restrict the rotation to those established names.

“We kind of know who we got out of the older guys,” Tuioti said after Practice 10. “It’s really the next ones that are coming up.”

Aydin Breland has reached approximately 315 pounds and retained enough athleticism to work inside and outside. Anthony “Tank” Jones is around 300 pounds and still possesses the speed and twitch Oregon recruited. Matthew Johnson continues earning praise for his intelligence and technique, while D’Antre Robinson provides another athletic interior option. Elijah Rushing has added enough size that Oregon is now experimenting with his ability to rush from both outside and inside.

Breland has already crossed an important threshold.

Oregon knew he could rush the passer. Tuioti wanted to know whether the Ducks could depend on him against the run on first and second down, and Breland’s growth there has changed how his coach describes him.

“He’s definitely a guy that we’re going to depend on,” Tuioti said, “definitely a guy that’s going to get a lot of reps for us this season.”

That is no longer developmental praise.

That is role language.

The challenge now becomes finding enough meaningful work for Breland, Jones, Johnson, Robinson and Rushing while Oregon also has veterans it fully expects to play winning football. Depth is most valuable when the difference between the top and bottom of the rotation becomes small enough that coaches can substitute without changing the standard.

Oregon appears increasingly close to having that problem up front.

The offensive line is approaching the other side of the same equation

A’lique Terry’s group has spent much of camp doing the opposite. Rather than determining how to distribute snaps among an abundance of established options, Oregon has been trying to discover which combination of individual pieces creates its best collective five.

Terry has never framed that process as simply finding five names. After Practice 4, he identified cohesion as the primary area needing improvement and said the staff was searching for “the right mesh and the right pairs.” He also warned that the mixing would eventually give way to a period where Oregon began “gluing it up a little bit more” once players separated themselves.

The first scrimmage gave Terry approximately 120 more plays of evidence, even though Lanning declined to provide an immediate evaluation before watching the film. Saturday’s second scrimmage should provide another major data point, and the question is beginning to shift from whether Oregon has six, seven or eight linemen worth developing toward which five work best together when the game becomes real.

The Ducks can continue developing depth after that answer emerges. They probably will.

But continuity eventually requires repetition too.

Scrimmage Two should begin revealing who receives the investment

That is what makes this week different from the first half of camp.

Early August repetitions could be investments in possibility. Give a freshman another look. Move a veteran to another position. Try another offensive-line pairing. Give another EDGE player a chance to demonstrate he belongs. Expand the playbook and determine how much football the roster can absorb.

Now those investments begin carrying opportunity cost.

Every first-team snap one player receives is a snap somebody else does not. Every quarterback repetition devoted to preparing the eventual No. 2 is one unavailable to the other two. Every offensive-line combination used repeatedly gives that group another chance to develop chemistry while another combination falls behind.

Lanning’s accountable-and-capable standard essentially tells us how Oregon intends to make those choices.

The Ducks spent two weeks trying to create depth.

The next two weeks will begin telling us which parts of that depth they actually trust.

Dan Lanning revealed that the first scrimmage is already changing how Oregon practices, Dante Moore is beginning to operate like a coach on the field, and Matayo Uiagalelei explained why the Ducks’ pass-rush goal is bigger than sacks. Eleven practices into camp, the most important development may be that Oregon is no longer simply collecting information. It is acting on it.

For most of fall camp, Oregon has been trying to create possibilitie

Dan Lanning opened Practice 1 talking about mental acuity and discovering how much football players could absorb. Chris Hampton filled the defensive menu before eventually determining what the Ducks should major in. Drew Mehringer called the roster a meritocracy while warning that offensive complexity can become a “double-edged sword.” A’lique Terry spent the first half of camp mixing offensive-line combinations because he wanted to find “the right mesh and the right pairs” before gluing anything together.

Saturday’s first scrimmage changed the language. After roughly 120 plays, Lanning reduced the evaluation to whether a player was accountable and capable, then made clear that the answers would eventually determine who continued receiving repetition

Practice 10 gave us the first evidence of response when Tony Tuioti said Oregon produced perhaps the best post-scrimmage practice he has seen during his time in Eugene.

Practice 11 gave us something even more revealing.

Lanning explained Tuesday that Oregon is now changing practice itself based on what the first scrimmage exposed.

“We struggled with tempo the other day in some of our scrimmage settings,” Lanning said. “So let’s recreate that more in practice.

That sentence may be the clearest indication yet that Oregon has entered the next stage of camp. The Ducks are no longer primarily asking how much they can install, how many positions a player can learn or how many competitors they can keep alive. The first scrimmage created evidence, the staff identified problems, and practice is now being redesigned to force Oregon to solve the problems. 

That is what makes Practice 11 worth considerably more than another collection of player updates.

Oregon is beginning to show us its feedback loop.

Lanning is building practices around what Oregon actually need.

The most valuable thing Lanning said Tuesday may have come when he was asked about his own development as a coach.

Rather than discussing some philosophical transformation, he described self-scouting. There are situations from previous seasons he looks back upon and asks how he could have handled them better, but that same process extends to the structure of camp.

“I think a lot of coaches might grab a practice script from last season and roll it out and say, ‘Hey, that’s the same one that we’re going to use,’” Lanning said. “I think we’ve always done a really good job of saying, ‘OK, what’s the needs of our team based off this last scrimmage? How do we need to adapt practice? What are we struggling with?

That provides important context for almost everything we have heard since camp began.

The early installation was broad because Oregon needed to discover what this roster could handle. The first scrimmage was intentionally simpler because Lanning wanted to separate schematic complexity from personnel evaluation. Instead of trying to win a scrimmage with cleverness, the Ducks called things players knew well enough that the staff could evaluate who blocked, tackled and broke tackles.

Now the process begins reversing.

The staff has film. It has identified a tempo problem. Instead of filing it away as something to discuss in a meeting, Oregon alters the next practices so the problem has to be confronted again.

That sounds obvious until you consider how easily fall camp can become a schedule rather than an organism. Practice 1 looks a certain way because Practice 1 always looks that way. The first scrimmage happens because the calendar says it should. Practice 11 becomes the next box to check.

Lanning described something different. Oregon appears to be treating camp as a series of experiments in which the result of one period changes the design of the next.

He also said more coaches and players have addressed the team this year, allowing essentially the same standard to arrive through different voice.

“A lot of times it’s a common message, but it’s coming from a different voice,” Lanning said. “Which has been really refreshing to see throughout fall camp.

That connects directly to the player-led culture Lanning talked about before the first practice. His original question to veteran players was not merely whether they could survive the work, but “Who’d you bring with you?” By Monday, Tuioti was praising Bear Alexander for acting like a “commander” and helping elevate younger teammates. By Tuesday, Lanning was describing a team hearing its message from more voices than his own.

The player-led idea is becoming less theoretical.

Dante Moore may be the clearest example of that evolution.

If there was one Practice 11 development that deserves to alter how we think about Oregon’s offense, it was Lanning’s description of Moore.

The conversation around Moore throughout the offseason has largely centered on what changes when a proven starting quarterback returns. At Media Day, the discussion was about experience and trust. Mehringer later called Moore the “heartbeat” and “foundation” of the offense and said his football knowledge was among the best he had encountered. Terry added another layer after Practice 4, describing the conversations between Moore and Iapani Laloulu as something closer to two players understanding the entire offense than two starters merely knowing their own job.

Lanning took that progression another step Tuesday.

“More than anything, just knowledge of the game,” Lanning said. “He has the answers so quick. He’s able to realize that this is not going to be a good play into this look. Let’s change the play. OK, I’m hot here. Let me get rid of it.

Then came the piece that matters even more.

“The ability to coach the other players around him because he knows what every single one of them is doing as well,” Lanning said. “It’s like having a coach on the field, which is huge.

That is not simply a quarterback becoming more comfortable.

It is offensive ownership.

A year ago, Moore was learning what Oregon wanted him to do as its starting quarterback. Now he is beginning to manipulate the offense before the snap, recognize bad answers quickly enough to change them and help correct players around him because his understanding extends beyond his own progression.

Moore described the process similarly Tuesday. He credited preparation and the trust between himself and Mehringer, explaining that the offense can encounter defensive looks it has already studied, adjust accordingly and then return to the film if the solution fail.

“If the play works, we’re happy, and if the play doesn’t work, we just go back to the film room and say, ‘Hey, how can we change it to be better?’” Moore said. “That’s just the game of football.

That answer almost mirrors Lanning’s description of how Oregon is building practice.

See the problem. Apply an answer. Study the result. Change what needs changing.

The quarterback and the program appear to be operating from the same learning mode.

Moore’s next jump is being built in details that rarely become highlight.

Moore also gave us perhaps his clearest explanation yet of what has actually changed from his first season as Oregon’s starter.

“Last year I was learning a lot,” Moore said. “Of course, it was my first time taking over the team and being able to play."

This year, he sees the difference in details. Moore talked about his body, yoga, working with strength and conditioning coach Wilson Love, protecting the football, making smarter reads, using his legs more effectively and adding both weight and speed. He also returned to the pre-snap component Lanning emphasized, saying he wants to help the offense get into better calls.

That is an important distinction because the obvious expectation for a returning quarterback is that Year 2 simply produces more of whatever worked in Year oone.

Moore is describing something more layered.

His progress is not merely throwing the same passes more accurately. It is changing the play before the mistake happens. It is recognizing pressure soon enough to beat it. It is knowing when the ball must leave his hand immediately. It is using his legs without becoming dependent upon them. It is understanding the responsibilities around him well enough to correct someone else.

Matayo Uiagalelei provided independent confirmation from the other side of the ball.

“Going against him every day, you could definitely tell, shoot, this guy’s smart,” Uiagalelei said. “He’s able to read our defense and get the offense in the right place.

Uiagalelei also noticed Moore’s movement within the pocket. As a pass rusher, he tries to visualize where the quarterback should be when his rush arrives, and Moore has become better at altering that picture.

“He’s definitely poised in the pocket,” Uiagalelei said. “Definitely his pocket movement, I feel like, has improved. He’s doing a good job of stepping up when he needs to."

Koa Ka’ai said almost exactly the same thing Monday about Dylan Raiola, identifying pocket movement as one of his major areas of improvement. Taken together, those comments tell us something about Oregon’s quarterback development that is easy to overlook. The Ducks are not treating processing and movement as separate skands.

The quarterback has to know where the answer is, know when the answer has changed and maintain enough pocket discipline to reach it.

Oregon’s defense is forcing that growth rather than allowing Moore to rehearse.

Moore’s development also cannot be separated from what he is practicing against.

Ka’ai made that case Monday when he said Oregon wants practice to be harder than the game and explained that a theoretically correct man-coverage answer still has to account for the ability of the defender executing the coverage. Oregon’s quarterbacks are practicing against a defensive front and secondary filled with players Ka’ai believes will eventually receive NFL opportunities.

Moore sees the same thing.

“The D-line here is special,” he said Tuesday. “They have a lot of great talent, but the O-line here is special as well. So it’s always iron sharpening iron out there.

Moore joked that he appreciates the red non-contact jersey when defensive linemen arrive in front of his face, but his larger point was that both sides are creating difficult repetitions for one another.

“They win reps, we win reps, and we just got to push each other and make sure that we just maximize every play."

That fits what I have continued to hear from inside camp. Oregon’s defensive front has won meaningful stretches against the offensive line, and the protection around Moore has not always been ideal. I still believe that needs to be monitored rather than dismissed, particularly as Terry moves closer to the stage where competition must become cohesion.

But the offensive-line evaluation has always required context. Fox Crader said at Media Day, “If they say we got the best D-line, we should be making our offensive line look like the best offensive line.

Practice 11 gave us the defensive philosophy making those repetitions difficult. 

It is not simply “get sacks."

It is destroy the pocket.

Uiagalelei explains what Oregon means by improving the pass rush.

Chris Hampton made one of the most candid admissions of camp after Practice 2 when he pointed toward Oregon’s lack of tackles for loss, sack production and red-zone stops last season.

“We have to sack the quarterback and finish,” Hampton said.

Lanning said after the scrimmage that Oregon had reached the quarterback several times and was seeing “glimpses” of improved pass-rush production. Tuioti followed Monday by describing Aydin Breland, Tank Jones, Matthew Johnson and D’Antre Robinson as part of a second wave capable of making the front deeper than the returning veterans alone.

Uiagalelei gave us the best explanation yet Tuesday of what Oregon is actually trying to butod.

“Sacks are cool, but we’re focusing on, we’re trying to destroy the pocket,” Uiagalelei said. “That’s the big thing we’re working on, destroying the pocket, assaulting the pocket, and everything, sacks, pressures, hits, that’s all going to come."

That is a more sophisticated goal than chasing sack total.

A defense obsessed with individual sacks can create escape lanes. One rusher wins high, another works inside without understanding where the quarterback is supposed to move, and suddenly the pass rush has produced four impressive individual efforts and one clean scramble lane.

Uiagalelei repeatedly returned to the opposite side.

“Four is one."

His pass-rush development includes get-off, eyes, bend, counters and knowing when he has rushed beyond the quarterback’s level, but he also specifically mentioned understanding what coverage is playing behind him. The rush is not independent of the other three defensive linemen, and the front is not independent of the coverage.

That idea has actually been building since spring.

Aydin Breland talked after the spring game about “cage rushes” and the importance of the entire defensive front understanding how to keep the quarterback contained rather than allowing individual rushers to chase statistics. He described Oregon’s potential danger in terms of “the way we understand the cage” and how the linemen rush together.

Now Uiagalelei is describing the fall-camp evolution of the same concept.

Destroying the pocket is collective.

The sack is merely one possible result.

Rip Rowan may be changing the pass-rush conversation.

Oregon did not simply decide it wanted more pressure and assume another year of experience would produce it.

The staff changed to.

Uiagalelei singled out the addition of Rip Rowan, who came to Oregon with NFL experience and another perspective on rushing the passer. He said Kam Araghi and Lanning already bring considerable pass-rush knowledge, but Rowan has introduced different ideas gained from working around NFL players, including Maxx CMaxxy.

“I feel like something that our coaching staff does well, our whole organization, is just having a growth mindset,” Uiagalelei said. “Adding Rip, you know, just bringing another perspective."

Uiagalelei believes Rowan has helped the entire rush unit while also giving individual players new tools for their own game.

That fits Lanning’s comments about coaching Tuesday more than it might initially appear.

Lanning talked about self-study, changing practice according to what Oregon needs and allowing more staff voices to influence the team. Uiagalelei is describing the personnel version of the same philosophy. Oregon already had coaches capable of teaching pass rush. Instead of deciding that was sufficient, the Ducks added another perspective.

The roster is being asked to grow.

So is the coaching staff.

Tank Jones is becoming one of the most interesting developmental stories in camp.

Few players better illustrate Oregon’s developmental approach than Anthony “Tank” Jones.

Tuioti revealed Monday that Jones is now around 300 pounds after entering the program significantly lighter. The easy assumption would be that Oregon simply decided to manufacture an interior defensive lineman by adding mass.

Lanning said Tuesday that was not the process.

“You want the guys to naturally be at what they can carry,” Lanning said. “Don’t put limitations on somebody for where they’ll be."

Oregon recognized relatively early that Jones could become much bigger without sacrificing the explosive traits that made him attractive in the first place. The goal was not weight for the sake of weight, but an unusual combination of mass, power and movement.

“We need big guys that have explosive power and quickness like him,” Lanning said. “He’s a guy that can be outside, inside, and that variety is really good for us."

Lanning said Jones has increasingly embraced working inside and believes he can play meaningful snaps this season if his current trajectory continues.

Uiagalelei provided even stronger testimony.

He said Jones has been “thrown in the fire” perhaps more than anyone in the defensive front and estimated he receives some of the highest practice rep volume in the room. Despite the physical transformation and schematic load, Uiagalelei believes Jones is handling it well.

“He’s just killing it,” Uiagalelei said. “We’re throwing a lot of stuff at him and he’s just killing it, improving every day."

The attraction is obvious. Jones can align as a five-technique, work inside as a three and move throughout the front while still carrying enough athleticism to have once played farther away from the ball.

That is exactly where Lanning wants the defensive line to go.

“You can’t ever play with just four players,” Lanning said.

The structure has evolved during his Oregon tenure. Roles that once might have required more specialized body types are increasingly becoming interchangeable because the Ducks now have bigger athletes who can perform multiperforms.

“If we can plug people in, it always ensures that you have your best 11 on the field,” Lanning said.

This is the defensive-line version of the multiplicity Oregon has been chasing across the roster since Practice 1.

The difference is that 300-pound players doing it can change the geometry of the front.

Elijah Rushing appears to be crossing the line from development into rotational.

The other major personnel development Tuesday involved Elijah Rushing.

At Media Day, Rushing gave one of the more revealing answers of Oregon’s entire offseason when he said, “Everyone’s journey is different.” His career has demanded more patience than the recruiting expectations attached to him might have predicted, and he talked about refusing to interpret somebody else’s timeline as evidence that his own development had failed.

Tuioti revisited that subject Monday, saying Rushing had trusted the process rather than immediately using the transfer portal to find a faster route to playing time.

Lanning supplied the football reason Tuesday that the patience may be ready to paypayf.

“He’s going to be able to play snaps for us this year,” LannLanningd.

The difference is not mysterious. Lanning said Rushing has become “a more violent finisher,” can separate from blocks, create knockback and operate with greater knowledge of the system.

There is also an individual developmental process happening away from practice. Lanning said Rushing meets with him individually on recovery days, creates his own cut-ups and arrives with questions about what he needs to improve.

“He’s really challenged himself to improve,” Lanning said. “He’s gotten stronger, he’s gotten more flexible, and I think all those things have paid dividends for him and it’s showing up in fall camp.

Uiagalelei’s perspective may have been even more powerful because it comes from a player who arrived with similarly enormous recruiting expectations but traveled a different path.

He remembers Rushing arriving before the Fiesta Bowl and immediately trying to jump to the front of an individual drill before a coach sent him to the back of the line. What stuck with Uiagalelei was not the freshman mistake but the eagerness.

“Just his work ethic, his attention to detail,” Uiagalelei said. “There’s no doubt in my mind that this year is definitely going to be a year where he shines."

“A lot of the work that he’s put in over these years is going to pay off."

That progression is what development is supposed to look like.

Rushing did not become less talented while waiting.

He became more pbecamee.

Dutch Horisk may be the best example of how quickly knowledge can create opportunity.

Uiagalelei also delivered one of the strongest young-player endorsements of camp when asked about Dutch Horisk.

The two have history from high school, so Uiagalelei was already familiar with the effort and energy. What surprised him was how quickly Horisk absorbed Oregon’s ddefene.

“I’ve never seen anyone pick up our playbook, our defensive playbook, as fast as he’s been picking it up,” Uiagalelei said.

That matters because the versatility follows the knowledge. Uiagalelei said Horisk can handle SAM, JACK and big end responsibilities, giving Oregon another player whose role becomes harder to define with a single position label.

The energy may be just as valuable.

“If our sideline is down, he’s going to be the one guy that’s telling everybody to get their energy up,” Uiagalelei said. “You can always count on him to have effort. He’s never going to be loafing or nothing like that."

That connects almost perfectly to Lanning’s opening Practice 1 standard.

Mental acuity earns a player the right to do more.

Horisk appears to be learning quickly enough that Oregon can ask for more almost immediately.

Tommy Tofi and Manny Iheanacho are getting exactly the education Oregon wants

The constant collision between Oregon’s defensive front and offensive line also continues producing important information about the freshmen.

Uiagalelei has spent time working against Tommy Tofi and Immanuel “Manny” Iheanacho and did not attempt to minimize their physical ability.

“Both of those guys are freaks,” Uiagalelei said. “Just get that out the way. Physical specimens."

What matters more is what comes next.

“They’re being just, like, thrown in the fire,” he said. “They have the ability to play and to be really good tackles, and I feel like they’re improving every day."

That is precisely what Terry described after Practice 4. Oregon is intentionally turning the faucet on rather than protecting the freshmen with a tiny collection of assignments. The staff believes both are physically capable, and both have been seeking extra meetings and asking questions rather than hiding what they do not yet understand.

The environment could hardly be more demanding.

Every day they are trying to process Oregon’s offense while blocking a defensive front whose stated objective is to destroy the pocket and whose veterans are trying to improve their own pass-rush game.

That is not the easiest path to looking good in August.

It may be the fastest path to becoming useful when Oregon eventually needs them.

Jeremiah McClellan is turning physical development into a larger role.

The receiver story Tuesday added another player to the growing list of Ducks whose camp is becoming difficult to dismiss.

Lanning said Jeremiah McClellan’s physical development has fundamentally changed part of his game.

“He has gotten so much stronger and stronger at the point of attack each year,” Lanning said. What was once an area that needed significant improvement became a weapon last season and, according to Lanning, has become even more pronounced this fall.

“He’s playing with violence,” Lanning said. “His speed in and out of breaks is really a separator."

Then Lanning added something that sounded increasingly familiar across Tuesday’s press conference: McClellan had just spoken to the team, another indication that his growth is extending beyond what happens when the ball is thrown his direction.

“His leadership skills have stepped up as well."

That is worth placing alongside everything we have heard about Oregon’s receivers 

The strongest camp buzz continues to surround Evan Stewart, with multiple people describing his performance as well beyond ordinary August praise. The room as a whole has been described to me as potentially Oregon’s deepest in years, and that means a receiver such as McClellan cannot simply rely on being good enough to play.

Mehringer called the room a meritocracy.

McClellan appears to be making his case with something broader than catches

Strength. Violence as a blocker. Separation. Leadership.

Those are the traits that help a player stay on the field when the football is not coming to him.

Jalen Lott is beginning to look like more than a freshman projection

Moore supplied another name Tuesday that should be filed away.

Jalen Lott caught his attention on the very first practice of camp.

Moore remembers seeing the freshman make a move, extend for a football and immediately thinking, “Wow, this is a freshman making these plays."

The physical talent remains obvious, particularly when the football is in the aur.

“When the ball’s in there, he’s going to go grab it,” Moore said.

The playbook is naturally the next challenge. Moore acknowledged that Lott can still be “swimming around” mentally because of his youth, but he also said the freshman has been working beyond the normal practice schedule.

“He’s been getting extra film, extra meetings with coaches, been getting extra work with me after practice,” Moore said. “So he’s someone that’s going to be very special for this program."

This is where Oregon’s receiver depth becomes especially interesting.

A deep room can prevent a freshman from playing because established players occupy the available repetitions. It can also accelerate him because the standard required to earn those repetitions becomes unusually high.

Lott does not have to be ready because Oregon desperately needs a receiver.

He has to become ready enough that Oregon cannot igncannotm.

Those are different developmental environments.

The backup quarterback competition remains open, but the evaluation is broader than Saturd

One day after Ka’ai detailed the contrasting strengths of Raiola, Brock Thomas and Akili Smith Jr., Lanning made clear that Oregon does not intend to turn the backup quarterback competition into a single scrimmage referendum.

“It will continue to compete all the way through,” Lanning said

The larger principle applies beyond quarterback.

“There’s very few guys that should be comfortable in their roles on our team because you’ve got to pay rent every single day in football,” Lanning said.

Then he explained what counts as payment.

“Everything adds up. Every piece matters. It’s walkthrough. It’s in the meeting room. It’s out there on the field. And you assess it all and evaluate it all."

That is an important addition to accountable and capable.

Saturday created the biggest collection of evidence Oregon has accumulated during camp, but it is not the only evidence. A quarterback can lose the backup job in a meeting by failing to prepare. A defender can strengthen his role in a walkthrough by demonstrating he understands a check. A receiver can earn trust through blocking and leadership rather than waiting for a practice filled witpractices.

Ka’ai said Monday that Oregon believes all three quarterbacks behind Moore can win games. Lanning’s answer Tuesday suggests the final order will be determined by accumulated trust rather than one spectacular afternoon.

That is probably how it should be.

Akili Smith Jr. continues making the conversation hard

Moore’s description of Smith reinforced what Ka’ai told us a day earlier.

Ka’ai said Smith has taken a “huge leap” since spring, learning to stop treating Oregon’s enormous schematic menu as something he has to use all at once and instead asking what each individual play requires. He also revealed the whiteboard study routine Smith developed at home, rewriting each night’s installation in a way that works for him rather than simply copying Moore’s preparation habits.

Moore sees the change on the field.

“Akili has been doing a great job,” Moore said. “When he first came in to now, the way he can go through progressions, the way he can escape, use his legs."

Then Moore smiled at the physical picture.

“He’s 6-6, 245, so, I mean, he looks like Cam Newton out there running around.

The comparison is visual rather than predictive, but the developmental point is real.

Smith’s arm and size were never the primary questions.

The game needed to slow down.

Your own spring-game observations pointed toward that process already beginning. Smith flashed the arm strength to hit Dakorien Moore downfield and showed that the physical throws were available, while timing and consistency still needed refinement.

Ka’ai now says he is operating within the system. 

Moore says he is working through progressions.

The evidence is beginning to stack.

Marcus Mariota’s influence is becoming more interesting because it is not really about Marcus Mariota the quarterback.

Ka’ai spent part of Monday’s availability explaining how Oregon uses Mariota as a resource for the current quarterbacks. His film still gets pulled up, current players have relationships with him and Moore has incorporated elements of Mariota’s footwork into his own game.

Moore’s answer Tuesday went somewhere more personal.

He praised Mariota’s speed, processing and ability to make plays with his legs, but the football admiration quickly turned toward the person.

“The biggest thing with him is just how he is in this world and outside of football,” Moore said, specifically mentioning the way Mariota carries himself and interacts with his family.

Moore recalled being around him at a golf range and watching Mariota with his children.

“That just makes me like, you know, he’s doing great things in life. I want to follow his footsteps."

That answer matters because Moore is entering the phase of his own career where quarterback development becomes inseparable from public identity.

He returned after a season that elevated his national profile, spent a summer traveling and handling major opportunities and now quarterbacks a team facing enormous external expectations. Mariota represents somebody who navigated Oregon stardom, professional football and everything around both without allowing the position to become his entire identity.

Moore also said Mariota called him before last season’s playoffs to offer advice and described Oregon’s former NFL players as people who continue pouring back into the program.

That is institutional knowledge that cannot be installed from a playbook.

Moore is deliberately removing some of the noise.

One of the more revealing off-field details Tuesday was Moore’s decision to step away from social media during camp.

The idea partly came through Lanning and partly from watching Bo Nix handle a similar period at Oregon.

“In our generation, we’re addicted to it,” Moore said.

He admitted he is not immune, joking about spending too much time on Instagram late at night, but the calculation is straightforward. Sleep matters. Preparation matters. His teammates matter more than another hour on the phone.

“I have a lot of priorities that I’m trying to maximize and then go attack,” Moore said. “So just being off social media and really giving 100 percent effort and attention to my teammates."

Uiagalelei has developed his own version. He joked that his father posts enough about him that he simply muted his account because he does not need to consume everything being said around him.

The humor should not obscure the larger point.

Oregon cannot control preseason rankings, awards lists or expectations. Lanning said Tuesday that the people making preseason polls “have nothing to do with the results on the field,” so the program’s response is to keep redirecting attention toward what players can actually control.

The Ducks cannot eliminate outside noise.

Their most important players are learning how to stop inviting it inside.

Uiagalelei’s own physical change is showing up through intention.

While much of the defensive-line discussion Tuesday centered on younger players, Uiagalelei also provided an update on his own offseason transformation.

He is playing lighter than before and believes the effect extends throughout his game

“I feel better. I feel in better shape, more conditioned,” Uiagalelei said. “It sounds kind of cliche, but every facet, I feel like."

The physical change, however, came with a mental one.

“I’ve been more intentional in everything I’ve been doing,” he said.

That word, intentional, belongs beside everything else we heard Tuesday.

Lanning is intentionally changing practices based on scrimmage evidence. Moore is intentionally reducing social-media distraction and building his body around a detailed routine. The defensive line is intentionally rushing as four rather than chasing sacks as individuals. Rushing is intentionally creating film cut-ups and meeting with Lanning. Smith has intentionally developed a study process tailored to the way he learns.

Eleven practices into camp, Oregon’s development is becoming less about effort in the abstract and more about directing that effort toward specific problems.

That is usually where improvement becomes measwheree.

Mistakes are becoming part of the design rather than evidence of failure.

Moore gave perhaps the best sentence of Practice 11 when asked how he handles mistakes now compared with earlier in his career.

“I enjoy and embrace every mistake I make because it makes me learn from it,” Moore said.

Then he went further.

“If I wasn’t making mistakes today, I mean, today I made mistakes, yesterday I made mistakes. If I wasn’t making mistakes, I’d be worried."

That could almost serve as the theme for the entire camp.

Oregon does not want an August without problems. That would probably mean the environment is not difficult enough to reveal the answers.

The first scrimmage exposed ball-security issues, special-teams inconsistencies and a tempo problem Lanning acknowledged Tuesday. The defensive front has stressed the offensive line. The secondary has made an exceptionally talented receiver room work for its success. Young players are being overloaded intentionally enough that some will occasionally look like freshmen.

The question is not whether mistakes eThet.

The question is whether Oregon is building a system that converts them into improvement quickly enougg.

Practice 11 gave us the strongest evidence yet that this is exactly what Lanning is trying to do.

The staff watches a scrimmage and redesigns practice around what failed. Moore recognizes a bad play and returns to the film room searching for the answer. Uiagalelei studies the details of a rush rather than simply adding another move. Rushing builds his own cut-ups and brings questions to recovery-day meetings. Smith draws the installation on a whiteboard because he discovered that another quarterback’s study habits are not automatically his own.

This is what accountable and capable begins looking like when the words leave the press conference.

Accountability means recognizing the mistake.

Capability means developing an answer

Practice 11 changed the question again.

The language surrounding Oregon has been narrowing since Media Day.

The players arrived talking about talent, connection and what the roster might become. Practice 1 introduced mental acuity. Mehringer gave us meritocracy. Terry moved the offensive-line discussion toward cohesion. Hampton and Uiagalelei kept returning to finish. The first scrimmage distilled everything into accountable and capable.

Practice 11 may have given us the next word.

Adaptation.

Oregon discovered a tempo issue Saturday, so Lanning changed practice to recreate it. Moore sees an unfavorable defensive picture and changes the play. The defensive line no longer wants four independent rushers looking for sacks, so it is building a coordinated attack designed to destroy the pocket. Players such as Jones and Rushing are changing their bodies without losing what originally made them valuable. Smith changed how he studies because the routine that works for Moore did not necessarily work for him.

Even the roster’s depth is forcing adaptation. Breland is becoming too dependable to treat as a situational pass rusher. Rushing is moving toward meaningful snaps. Jones is becoming a 300-pound multi-position problem. Horisk is learning fast enough to be used in several spots. McClellan is becoming a more violent blocker and a more visible leader. Lott is pushing against the normal timetable for a freshman receiver.

This is what should happen after 11 practices.

Oregon does not need August to confirm everything it already believed. It needs camp to expose the places where those beliefs break down, then determine whether the program can respond before an opponent gets the opportunity.

Saturday’s first scrimmage gave Oregon what I called contact with the truth

Practice 11 showed us what the Ducks are beginning to do with it

And that may be the most encouraging development of camp so far.

There is an easy way to interpret almost everything we have heard about Oregon’s line of scrimmage through the first two weeks of fall camp. The defensive front has gotten the better of the offensive line during meaningful stretches, Dante Moore has not always operated from the kind of clean pocket Oregon would prefer, and the Ducks are still trying to find the five-man combination that gives them the right mixture of talent and cohesion.

None of that should simply be waved away because it is August. Oregon lost three starters from an offensive line that finished last season as a Joe Moore Award finalist, and A’lique Terry has spent much of camp mixing combinations rather than settling prematurely on a starting five. After Practice 4, Terry identified cohesion as the area where his group needed to make its largest improvement, saying the staff was still searching for “the right mesh and the right pairs” before eventually beginning to “glue” the group together.

But Koa Ka’ai said something after Practice 10 that made me take another look at what those difficult offensive repetitions might actually mean.

“You want practice to be harder than the game,” Oregon’s quarterbacks coach said.

Ka’ai was not offering the standard coaching cliché about demanding practices making Saturdays easier. He was talking specifically about the caliber of defense Oregon’s quarterbacks have to solve every day and how that changes what constitutes a correct answer. In his estimation, the Ducks’ first-team defense includes NFL talent across essentially every level, with additional players behind them who will eventually have similar opportunities.

That means Oregon’s quarterbacks are not merely learning whether a play works against a particular coverage. They are learning whether it works when the defender across from them has the athletic ability to defeat an answer that looks correct on a whiteboard.

“Here’s our man-to-man beater,” Ka’ai said, describing the thought process. “But now I have to play ability, right? There’s another variable, another layer that comes into play.”

“To get to go against guys who are going to play on Sundays every day in camp, I think that’s an invaluable experience for our guys,” he added. “Sometimes practice is harder than a game, you know, and I think that’s what you kind of want when you go out there on Saturdays.”

That does not eliminate Oregon’s offensive-line question. It does change the context surrounding it.

The concern can be real without the conclusion being obvious

Read more

The quarterbacks showed situational command, the defensive line’s next wave continues to emerge, and a team that has talked all summer about becoming player-led delivered what Tony Tuioti called an “elite” Monday after its first fall scrimmage.

There are plenty of ways to evaluate a scrimmage. Dan Lanning gave Oregon two of them Saturday when he said every player would eventually be judged on whether he was accountable and capable, but the more revealing test may have arrived roughly 48 hours later.

It is one thing to play approximately 120 snaps on Saturday, receive a recovery day and feel good about surviving the first significant live work of fall camp. It is another to return Monday, put the scrimmage behind you and practice with the kind of urgency Oregon will eventually require after Saturdays that actually count. Defensive line coach Tony Tuioti has been at Oregon throughout Lanning’s tenure, and he said Practice 10 produced something he had not seen before.

“This is like the first time in my career since I’ve been here at Oregon where we had a scrimmage on Saturday and we had an elite practice on Monday,” Tuioti said. “Typically there’s a little dip from that and you try to get the guys to come practice really, really hard. But today I’m really, really proud of those guys because it was one of the best practices we’ve had coming off a scrimmage.”

That answer probably tells us more about Practice 10 than any depth-chart revelation would have.

Oregon began fall camp talking about possibilities. Lanning wanted to discover how much football players could absorb. Chris Hampton talked about installing enough defense that the Ducks could eventually determine what they did best. Drew Mehringer called the roster a meritocracy. By Saturday, Lanning had reduced the evaluation to accountable and capable and warned that players who failed either test would eventually see their repetitions diminish.

Monday began showing us what happens next.

The first scrimmage supplied evidence. Practice 10 began revealing how Oregon responds to it.

The player-led idea is beginning to acquire substance

Tuioti’s description of Monday connects all the way back to Lanning’s first practice of camp. After that opening workout, Lanning said the first day can sometimes become an exercise in survival before challenging his veteran players with a different question: “You were able to make it. Who’d you bring with you?” He wanted more than established players who could meet Oregon’s standard individually. He wanted “alphas” capable of pulling somebody else toward it.

The first scrimmage offered another piece of that story. Oregon finished roughly 120 plays and then conditioned, and Lanning said players were asking for more rather than simply waiting for practice to end. That was encouraging, but Monday may have been a better test because emotion can carry players through a scrimmage. Returning two days later and attacking an ordinary practice requires something more sustainable.

Tuioti traced Monday’s response directly to the mindset Oregon has been trying to create.

“Coach Lanning challenges each and every one of us to choose hard,” Tuioti said. “On the other side of hard is our greatness. And none of us came here to Oregon because we were looking for easy. We know that it’s definitely hard here. The competition is really, really high. Expectations are really, really high. You know, it’s a privilege for us. Pressure is a privilege, and we enjoy that.”

Then he gave us an example of what Lanning’s Practice 1 challenge looks like when it begins working. Tuioti said Bear Alexander took another step Monday in bringing teammates along, describing one of Oregon’s levels of competitors as a “commander,” a player who can elevate the performance of younger teammates rather than simply handling his own responsibility.

“Can our leaders bring people along with them?” Tuioti said. “If we can bring everybody else that are, you know, whether they’re younger, they’re first-year guys, second-year guys, to play better than what they’ve done the day before, we’re better as a team. And I thought we took that step today.”

That is almost a direct answer to the question Lanning posed two weeks ago.

Who did you bring with you?

On Monday, Tuioti believed some of Oregon’s veterans did.

Koa Ka’ai saw a quarterback room playing the situation rather than merely the play

Quarterbacks coach Koa Ka’ai’s review of Saturday was similarly encouraging, although the most important part of his assessment was not a completion percentage or explosive throw.

It was situational understanding.

“I think those guys made good decisions,” Ka’ai said. “We had one turnover that was on a batted ball. But beyond that, I thought those guys did a really good job of understanding the situation in the game, not playing every down like it’s first down.”

Ka’ai called it a “pretty sound first scrimmage” and said it was probably among the better ones the quarterback room has produced during his time at Oregon. More importantly, he said all four quarterbacks have made identifiable improvements from spring through fall camp.

That situational piece is worth lingering on because it fits almost perfectly with the way Oregon’s offensive conversation has evolved.

Mehringer spent the first week describing an offense that wants to avoid turnovers, generate explosive plays, run when required and become better in the red zone. He also warned that complexity can become a “double-edged sword” because every new answer requires repetitions that could have gone somewhere else. Lanning then explained Saturday that Oregon deliberately called things its players already understood so the staff could evaluate who could actually block, tackle and break tackles rather than hiding personnel evaluation beneath schematic complexity.

Ka’ai’s evaluation moves the quarterback version of that discussion forward. Knowing the playbook is not enough anymore. The quarterbacks have to understand what the moment requires and avoid treating every snap as an independent opportunity to make something happen.

That is especially important for a room Oregon appears to believe is substantially deeper than a traditional starter-and-backup arrangement.

Dylan Raiola’s progress has become increasingly tangible

Saturday, Lanning called Dylan Raiola a “night and day different player” from the quarterback who arrived for spring practice. Monday, Ka’ai gave us considerably more detail about what has actually changed.

The playbook, interestingly, was not the primary issue.

“The guy’s super smart, so learning the offense really wasn’t a hurdle for him,” Ka’ai said. “But physically, he’s improved. Like I said, his pocket movement, his body’s changed a bunch.”

That fills in an important piece of the Raiola story we have been following since Media Day. Raiola acknowledged that spring was not always smooth as he learned a new system and adapted to another program. The information that began filtering out later in camp suggested he had reshaped his body and taken significant steps in his command of the offense. Lanning’s post-scrimmage assessment validated that trajectory, while Ka’ai’s comments Monday explained that some of the biggest gains have come in the physical details required to make the talent function inside the pocket.

That is also consistent with what Raiola showed publicly in the spring game. His layered throw to Messiah Hampton down the sideline was one of the better quarterback throws of the afternoon, but spring was always supposed to be the starting point rather than the finished version.

The next step is no longer demonstrating that Raiola belongs in the room.

It is determining exactly where he belongs within it.

Akili Smith Jr. is beginning to turn tools into operation

Ka’ai provided perhaps an even more revealing update on Akili “KJ” Smith Jr., because the question surrounding Smith has never really been whether the physical ability exists.

It has been how quickly everything else can catch up.

“KJ, I can’t speak enough of how much KJ has grown from the spring till now,” Ka’ai said. “He’s taken a huge leap. A lot of that’s just like playing in the confines of the system.”

That phrase, the confines of the system, matters. Ka’ai explained that Oregon provides quarterbacks with numerous schematic tools, which can become overwhelming for a young player when the game is moving quickly. Smith’s progress has come from learning to slow that process down and ask a more manageable question.

“What is this play asking of me?” Ka’ai said, describing Smith’s development. “And going out there and operating.”

Later, Ka’ai explained where some of that progress is coming from. Smith has developed his own study routine rather than simply copying what works for somebody else in the room. At home, he goes into a guest room with a whiteboard and redraws the installation each night, turning the playbook into something he can process in his own way.

“He’s figured out, ‘Hey, what works for Dante Moore studying-wise might not work for me. What is the schedule and the routine that I need?’” Ka’ai said. “You can see through camp all that work that he’s put in in the offseason since the spring game until now. And he can see the fruit of his labor now.”

That may be one of the better developmental details we have received about any young Oregon player this camp. The physical traits brought Smith to Oregon. Learning how he learns may be what allows him to eventually use them.

Dante Moore is becoming the standard inside the room

The most significant quarterback development, however, may not involve the competition behind Dante Moore at all.

It may be the way his presence affects it.

Ka’ai said Moore’s third year in the program has given him an understanding of small details and offensive intricacies that even newer members of the staff may not possess. The result is an offense Ka’ai believes can carry almost anything Oregon wants to ask of it.

“There’s not much that we can’t do right now at all,” Ka’ai said. “And I think his knowledge definitely rubs off on the rest of the room.”

Then came the more revealing line.

“It’s not like, ‘Oh, hey, Tay’s the starter. That’s the guy, yada, yada, yada.’ It’s like, ‘Well, hey, Tay’s the starter. How do I become like Dante Moore?’ So he kind of sets the standard and he kind of sets the example for the rest of the room.”

That is a considerably different quarterback story from the one Oregon carried into previous seasons when the primary August question was about identifying the starter. Moore’s return changed that. The Ducks know who will run the offense if healthy. What they are discovering now is what happens when an established starter becomes a developmental resource for everybody behind him.

Mehringer had already pointed toward that evolution earlier in camp, describing Moore’s greatest growth in terms of leadership and command rather than simply arm talent. Ka’ai reinforced it Monday, saying Moore has taken another step in defensive recognition and in holding teammates accountable because he is no longer navigating his first season as Oregon’s starter.

The public side of Moore’s offseason has also expanded dramatically. He appeared on the cover of EA Sports College Football, traveled and received the kind of attention that naturally follows a quarterback with his résumé and profile. Ka’ai does not believe any of it has followed Moore back into the building.

“He’s a very private kid, and he’s a professional,” Ka’ai said. “When it’s time to work, it’s time to work. When it’s time to play, it’s time to play. When it’s time to kind of get away, it’s time to get away.”

“He does a really good job of not letting the two worlds blend,” Ka’ai added.

That ability may become increasingly important as Oregon moves closer to the season. Moore no longer needs to prove he can throw the football at this level. The next challenge is carrying the expectations attached to Oregon’s quarterback position without allowing everything surrounding the position to interfere with playing it.

Marcus Mariota remains part of Oregon’s quarterback education

Ka’ai has a particularly useful perspective on that issue because his relationship with Marcus Mariota stretches back to when both were freshmen at Oregon. He remembers Mariota as the quarterback who was not yet expected to play but was still awake at 5 a.m. working through cadence and call sheets.

More than a decade later, Ka’ai believes Mariota’s value to the current quarterback room extends beyond anything he did while winning the Heisman Trophy.

“He’s just such a great role model for our guys,” Ka’ai said. “Somebody who carries himself in class, somebody who’s been through the ups and downs of success in this sport and some ebbs and flows of the sport.”

Ka’ai pointed specifically to the way Mariota has handled changes in his NFL role and said current Oregon quarterbacks have relationships with him, sometimes reaching out directly.

There are football details too. Ka’ai said Moore’s footwork on read-zone plays includes elements taken directly from studying Mariota, and Oregon will pull up Mariota’s NFL film when he is around the program. The Heisman Trophy sitting inside the building provides the obvious symbol, but Ka’ai’s point was that Mariota continues to offer something more useful than nostalgia.

He provides a living example of how the position can be carried.

“When you walk in this building, what do you see on the first floor? You see the Heisman,” Ka’ai said. “He’s kind of set that standard for what it is to be an Oregon athlete, I think.”

The backup competition is about trust, not merely arm talent

The depth behind Moore remains unresolved, and Ka’ai did not attempt to manufacture clarity that Oregon has not yet reached.

His explanation of the backup quarterback job was more interesting than a ranking anyway.

“The guy’s got to want to play for him,” Ka’ai said. “The guys got to believe in that person. The guys have to want to go out there and battle for that person.”

Knowledge and arm talent obviously matter, but Ka’ai said Oregon already believes it has four quarterbacks who can win games. The separator becomes consistency, command and the ability to move the offense rather than simply possessing the best collection of individual traits.

That is what makes the three candidates behind Moore so different.

Brock Thomas brings years of system knowledge and has already answered the call when Oregon needed him, including helping the Ducks win a difficult game against Wisconsin. Smith has the unusual physical profile, with Ka’ai describing the 6-foot-6 quarterback as a player who can run, possesses a powerful arm and routinely flashes those traits in practice. Raiola brings something neither has: extensive starting experience in the Big Ten and proof that he can run an offense at this level.

“At some point, we’re going to have to figure that out,” Ka’ai said. “But all three guys have talents, and all three guys are capable of winning games in this league, we believe.”

Eventually Oregon will need an order because practice repetitions require one. Ka’ai acknowledged that reality, explaining that the decision will involve Lanning, Mehringer and the entire quarterback operation rather than becoming his call alone. Continuity matters, and backup quarterbacks cannot develop properly if nobody knows who will receive the meaningful second-team work.

That decision does not sound imminent.

But unlike the competition for the starting job, it is a decision Oregon can afford to make carefully.

Practice against Oregon’s defense is changing what the quarterbacks have to solve

The quarterback evaluation also cannot be separated from the defense across the line.

Ka’ai was asked whether practicing against a defense with legitimate NFL talent throughout the depth chart helps the quarterbacks. His response was unequivocal.

“Without a doubt,” Ka’ai said. “You want practice to be harder than the game, right? And there’s a bunch of places that that is the case. And I can tell you without a doubt, that’s 100 percent the case here.”

Ka’ai talked about accounting for defensive linemen capable of playing professionally and a secondary filled with similar potential. The result is that Oregon’s quarterbacks are not merely running plays against the correct coverage. They have to account for the athletic ability of the defender executing it.

“Here’s our man-to-man beater, but now I have to play ability,” Ka’ai said. “There’s another variable, another layer that comes into play.”

“To get to go against guys who are going to play on Sundays every day in camp, I think that’s an invaluable experience for our guys,” he added. “Sometimes practice is harder than a game, and I think that’s what you kind of want.”

That provides an important counterweight to one of the larger concerns emerging from camp. Everything I have heard suggests Oregon’s defensive front has gotten the better of the offensive line through significant stretches, and Moore has not always received the cleanest protection. That is something worth continuing to monitor, but Ka’ai’s comments capture why the evaluation cannot stop at saying the offense lost a rep.

The quality of the opponent matters.

And Tuioti gave us considerably more evidence Monday about exactly what the offense is seeing.

The defensive line’s next wave is becoming difficult to call a second group

Most of Oregon’s defensive-line attention entering camp centered on the veterans. Tuioti did not dispute what players such as Teitum Tuioti, Matayo Uiagalelei, Bear Alexander and A’Mauri Washington bring, but his review of the scrimmage quickly moved toward the players behind them.

“We kind of know who we got out of the older guys,” Tuioti said. “It’s really the next ones that are coming up.”

The names that followed should sound familiar to anyone who has followed Oregon since spring.

Aydin Breland has added enough size to reach approximately 315 pounds while maintaining the athleticism to work both outside and inside. Tuioti called him a “big-time pass rusher.” Anthony “Tank” Jones has undergone an even more dramatic physical transformation, reaching roughly 300 pounds while maintaining the speed, power and twitch that made him intriguing at a much lighter weight. Matthew Johnson earned praise as a technician whose pre-snap intelligence and dependability allow him to handle considerable responsibility, while D’Antre Robinson gives Oregon another large, twitchy and athletic body.

This is not a new development created by one August scrimmage. Breland was one of the more disruptive defensive players in Oregon’s spring game, where he and Nasir Wyatt combined to collapse the pocket and Breland later added another sack. Jones and Robinson also generated pressure that afternoon.

What has changed is the certainty with which Tuioti is talking about Breland’s role.

Aydin Breland has moved from promising pass rusher toward dependable defensive lineman

Breland’s athleticism has never been difficult to see. His ability to rush the passer showed up throughout spring, and the size increase has only made the possibilities more interesting.

The question was whether Oregon could trust him when opponents were not obviously throwing the football.

“We’ve known that he can always rush the passer, but as always, can we depend on you first, second down?” Tuioti said. “And he’s made that a point of emphasis for him.”

Tuioti said Breland has become bigger and stronger enough to handle combination blocks, hold the point and become more reliable against the run. His conclusion left considerably less ambiguity than most August position discussions.

“He’s definitely a guy that we’re going to depend on, definitely a guy that’s going to get a lot of reps for us this season.”

That may be one of the more important personnel developments of Practice 10.

Hampton said earlier in camp that the players perceived as Oregon’s second defensive-line group were actually competing with the established veterans, and he resisted treating anybody as the owner of a starting spot. Breland now appears to be supplying exactly the kind of evidence that makes those comments more than motivational language.

Oregon may have four veteran names everyone recognizes.

That does not mean it intends to play only four.

Position flexibility is giving Hampton more ways to construct the front

The theme of versatility that Lanning introduced after Practice 1 showed up repeatedly in Tuioti’s interview.

Lanning originally called it “mental acuity,” explaining that Oregon would ask players to handle additional roles only after demonstrating they could absorb the information. The examples stretched across the roster: running backs doing more than playing running back, receivers learning every spot, offensive linemen working multiple positions and defensive backs moving between levels of the defense.

The defensive line is beginning to show its own version.

Breland can work outside and inside. Jones offers similar flexibility at nearly 300 pounds. Elijah Rushing is now around 285 pounds, according to Tuioti, and Oregon has begun expanding what it asks him to do as well.

“We’re a defense that has a variety of schemes, and we can do a lot of things,” Tuioti said. “And when you got athletic bodies like that, you can plug and play them where you want.”

Tuioti said Rushing’s length allows him to hold up in the run game while also contributing pass rush from multiple alignments, including some interior work Oregon is beginning to introduce.

That connects back to Hampton’s description from the first week of camp. Oregon installed broadly because the eventual goal was not to use everything. It was to determine which players could handle which jobs, self-scout the result and “major” in the things Oregon performs best.

The more players Tuioti develops who can function in multiple alignments, the more freedom Hampton has to make the defense look different without constantly changing personnel.

That is where depth becomes schematic value.

“The ball is oxygen” gives another layer to Oregon’s defensive emphasis

Saturday, Lanning made one of his strongest defensive statements of camp when he said this has been Oregon’s best fall camp under him in terms of attacking the football.

Tuioti made clear Monday that the defensive line is not exempt from that responsibility.

“The ball, the ball, the ball,” Tuioti said. “The ball is oxygen for us.”

The emphasis begins in individual periods and carries into team work, with Oregon deliberately celebrating takeaways and ball attacks so the behavior becomes contagious across the defense.

That is another important expansion of the “havoc” discussion Hampton introduced after Practice 2. Oregon entered camp wanting more sacks and tackles for loss after failing to finish enough opportunities last season. Saturday showed that havoc is not limited to putting the quarterback on the ground. Lanning said Peyton Woodyard intercepted a tipped pass and described this defense as the best of his Oregon tenure at attacking possession.

For the defensive line, those ideas work together. Pressure can produce poor throws. Pursuit creates opportunities to attack the ball. Stopping the run earns better pass-rush situations, which Lanning emphasized Saturday when discussing the glimpses he has seen from Oregon’s improved rush.

The defense does not simply want disruption.

It wants disruption that changes possession.

Development means surviving the part where somebody else is ahead of you

Tuioti’s update on Elijah Rushing supplied another connection to the larger culture Oregon has been trying to build.

Rushing arrived at Oregon with the résumé and recruiting profile that naturally created expectations for immediate production, but his first seasons have required considerably more patience. In the portal era, Tuioti acknowledged how easy it would be for a player to interpret limited playing time as a reason to leave.

He was glad Rushing did not.

“I’m just glad that Elijah trusts the process here, knows that everybody develops at different times,” Tuioti said.

He used A’Mauri Washington as the example. Washington did not immediately become a starter, but Tuioti said he never heard him complain about repetitions or ask why the role had not arrived sooner. The development eventually produced the opportunity.

“A lot of that has to go back to the relationship,” Tuioti said. “Elijah’s got a great relationship with Coach Ham, Coach Lanning, myself, and he trusts the process.”

That answer fits almost perfectly with Lanning’s accountable-and-capable framework. Development does not happen according to recruiting ranking. It happens when a player becomes capable of doing the job and accountable enough that the staff trusts him to keep doing it.

The increasingly interesting part of Rushing’s camp is that his body and role are both moving closer to that point.

Oregon’s defensive-line culture may be helping make the depth possible

Tuioti eventually pulled the conversation away from technique, weight gain and personnel packages and toward something that has followed Oregon since Media Day: connection.

The four returning veterans matter because of what they can do on Saturdays, but Tuioti believes their larger value is the way they transfer their experience throughout the room. He sees older players coaching younger teammates between repetitions, helping them with details and treating another player’s improvement as something that strengthens the group rather than threatens their own role.

“If we have a team that’s like that, that’s connected, that care about each other, we can do some really, really special things,” Tuioti said.

That connection extends beyond the Hatfield-Dowlin Complex.

Tuioti described his home as a regular gathering place for the defensive line. Players come over, eat, play dominoes and have become hooked on Nertz, a competitive multiplayer variation of solitaire. Some have had the garage or front-door code for years. Tuioti joked that he has occasionally found himself making three dinners in one night because different players arrived hungry.

The story could easily be dismissed as a fun fall-camp anecdote, but it fits something Oregon players have been telling us since Media Day. Dave Iuli described connection as something created by enduring difficult things together. Hampton praised a defensive back room whose members celebrate one another despite competing for the same jobs. Terry has described a similar dynamic among offensive linemen. Tuioti’s room has simply built some of that connection around a dinner table and a deck of cards.

“I’m just glad that guys feel comfortable enough to come and just hang out,” Tuioti said. “It comes and goes really, really fast. And as a parent that’s had seven kids and now I only got a freshman at the house now, like you got to enjoy all the phases.”

“This is a really, really special year for us,” he added. “So we just want to make sure we do it the right way.”

That may also explain why Tuioti’s answer about Monday mattered so much.

Oregon has no shortage of talent. The quarterbacks see NFL-level defenders every day. The defensive line has established veterans and another wave pushing behind them. Position flexibility is giving the staff more possibilities, while competition is beginning to create actual consequences.

Talent was never going to be the difficult part to identify.

The harder question was what would happen once camp became tiring, the first scrimmage put 120 plays on everybody’s legs and the novelty of August wore off.

Practice 1 began with Lanning asking players who they could bring with them. The first scrimmage ended with players asking for more conditioning. Practice 10 opened the next phase with a defensive-line coach saying Oregon had just produced the best Monday he could remember following a scrimmage.

There are still significant questions. The offensive line remains worth watching against a defensive front that continues to make life difficult. Oregon eventually has to sort out the order behind Moore. Talented young defenders still have to turn flashes into roles, and the second scrimmage will give the staff another opportunity to discover whether corrections from the first one actually held.

But Practice 10 provided something useful before any of those questions are answered.

Saturday showed Oregon how it performed when the coaches made the game more real.

Monday showed how the Ducks responded after seeing the results.

At this point in fall camp, that may be every bit as valuable.